Jump to content

99 GMC Z71


Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks Guys,  

chainsaw-Yes I changed my driveshaft bc I have autotrac (Got a brand new trailmaster front shaft for 112 bucks on ebay).  I also got the rear spring option instead of the blocks as well as the skids and kickers. :thumbs:

Posted
Nice truck man, glad to see you lifted it the "right" way too...just one question, how do you like those new MT's?

Man, I'm really impressed w/ the MT KM's.  They are extremely quiet for a mud Tire, They pull well in the mud and have enough sidewall tread to really get you out of some nasty ruts.  I just wish BFG made a wider tire :thumbs:

 

BTW- They do take plenty of throttle to clean in the thick stuff, but if you can spin 'em, they'll dig!!

Posted

Very Sweet. I love teh Mud-terrians KMs too that I have on my truck.  They do a great job in the mud and all.  Just need to save the money to lift it.  Anyways, your truck looks great.   :thumbs:

Posted

Sweet, I got a set of the "old style" 33's with about 200 miles on them that are just sitting at my house, I slapped myself in the face after I bought them because right after I got them the "new style" MT's came out like a month later  ??? (but then I found out I was going to have to drive like 3 hours to college so on went a set of 33inch Goodyear Wrangler AT/S).  Glad to hear that you are impressed with them though.

Posted
Sweet, I got a set of the "old style" 33's with about 200 miles on them that are just sitting at my house, I slapped myself in the face after I bought them because right after I got them the "new style" MT's came out like a month later  ??? (but then I found out I was going to have to drive like 3 hours to college so on went a set of 33inch Goodyear Wrangler AT/S).  Glad to hear that you are impressed with them though.

WB, I would slap on thos MT's.  They ride pretty darn good for muds.  BTW- Here's another pic.

 

Z71a.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,800
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    mans44
    Newest Member
    mans44
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 1 Anonymous, 407 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Disassembly may be Required!   Every blender makes claims but do  you ponder those claims? What was really said? Was it true?  Motive for saying it? What does in infer?  Is that inference true?    Let's do one.    Claim: Made from shear stable base oils.    What was said: Base Oils are shear proof.   Was it true: Yes.  ALL base oils are Newtonian.    Motive / Inference: To imply the fully formulated product is Shear Proof.    Is the Inference true?: Most fully formulated multigrade oils contain Viscosity Modifiers or VM's, sometimes called VII or Viscosity Index Improvers. There are four types. One is in fact shear proof but it also has a bad effect on extreme cold flow and is restricted to use in specialty oils. A second has limited shear called a 0-5 SSI polymer. Meaning its shear is limited to a range of zero to five percent as reported by the ASTM D6278 Shear Stability Index test. A few high end oils, like Torco SR-5, use them and brag about it profusely. Actually all that use it point it out. The last two shear dramatically and are often marketed as a 'feature' of the product aiding the oil to meet fuel standard requirements of ever stricter rules. One shears more than 5% and the other up to 20%. As you make guess, cost is directly linked to shear down and as such the majority of oils use the cheapest organic polymers sold to make grade and pass stringent tests.    PPD's or Pour Point Depressants also shear a bit, only a few percent and hide inside the 0-5 SSI capabilities.    The blender knows he can not out engineer Stribeck. Physics is not a suggestion. But he can wordcraft the unsuspecting toward believing a false claims INFERENCE. This is LEGAL. It is COMMON, and it is EFFECTIVE.         
    • I don't recall ever dealing with one on an '06 and back. It may not even exist on that. I can't remember for sure.   Any kind of ice in or after the evaporator is normally due to low charge with both a clutch-cycling orifice tube system, and a TXV system.
    • Engines wear. It is unavoidable. So the question isn't if it will wear out but rather WHEN it will wear out. That question is about rate and RATE is a HUGE problem for almost everyone; but not in the way we may think.    Unless there is something drastically wrong with your powertrain, wear is exceedingly slow. It doesn't wear out in minutes or hours or days or months but in years or even decades. Ditto sludge and varnish. Humans are an impatient lot so to see the benefit of a truly superior product you may have to wait a very long time. Most will get bored first and trade before they reap the benefit.   Humans are not companionate creatures when it comes to those we do not know. We don't care what happens to the second or third owner as long as it doesn't happen to us or someone we know and actually like.   Sad commentary on humans but it is what it is. That thus, then, there is no advantage...to or for you if the above paragraphs adequately describe you.    BUT if you are a buy and hold type and patient enough to reap the rewards of your labors then that thing that is happening that you haven't yet seen, but will; can be abated by such products. Seals harden and leak with time and lots of it. Rings stick after thousands of miles of a slowly building plaque of varnish.    Then there is this. This didn't happen over night and this poor fellow knew when he removed the cover and not one second before.   Not "aware' isn't the same thing as "isn't happening".        The above was typical of the Ford 361 and 391 bus motors on Bulk Pennzoil Mineral Oil products on 3K mile OCI's at about 60K miles back in the 60's and 70's at the Anamosa School District when my Uncle took over their maintenance program.    This is Pepper at @ 165K on 5K OCI's using Group IV/V Full Synthetics.      HM oils will help the first but not the second.    Then again if one used..... ah, ya know.....
    • Thanks for coming back with an update. 
    • Awesome you got it sorted! That's a new potential issue I'll have to mark in my book of issues. Thanks for the feedback.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...