Jump to content

V8 For 2008!


Recommended Posts

Posted

Okay guys I'm just sharing what I found.. on the 2008 Canyon page under power options it says this:

 

Engines

• 2.9L DOHC I-4 MFI

• 3.7L DOHC I-5 MFI

• Available V8 engine (available early 2008)

 

Here's a link so ya'll can see it for yourself..

 

http://www.gmc.com/canyon/canyon/specsStandard.jsp

 

That ought to make some mouths water!

Posted
Okay guys I'm just sharing what I found.. on the 2008 Canyon page under power options it says this:

 

Engines

• 2.9L DOHC I-4 MFI

• 3.7L DOHC I-5 MFI

• Available V8 engine (available early 2008)

 

Here's a link so ya'll can see it for yourself..

 

http://www.gmc.com/canyon/canyon/specsStandard.jsp

 

That ought to make some mouths water!

That would certainly change the truck's character. I bet it would increase sales since the towing ability would be improved for those who might want to pull a boat.

Posted
Okay guys I'm just sharing what I found.. on the 2008 Canyon page under power options it says this:

 

Engines

• 2.9L DOHC I-4 MFI

• 3.7L DOHC I-5 MFI

• Available V8 engine (available early 2008)

 

Here's a link so ya'll can see it for yourself..

 

http://www.gmc.com/canyon/canyon/specsStandard.jsp

 

That ought to make some mouths water!

 

 

 

Ahh you beat me to the post i was just reading about it. wondering if the mpg will be around the same as 1/2tons?

Posted
Okay guys I'm just sharing what I found.. on the 2008 Canyon page under power options it says this:

 

Engines

• 2.9L DOHC I-4 MFI

• 3.7L DOHC I-5 MFI

• Available V8 engine (available early 2008)

 

Here's a link so ya'll can see it for yourself..

 

http://www.gmc.com/canyon/canyon/specsStandard.jsp

 

That ought to make some mouths water!

 

 

 

Ahh you beat me to the post i was just reading about it. wondering if the mpg will be around the same as 1/2tons?

 

 

I would think it would be better? There's a pretty good weight difference between a Silverado and a Colorado so I would hope that there'd be a margin between the two..

Posted

I could easily have been swayed to a Colorado rather than my Silverado, I like the Colorados looks a lot more, but need the towing capacity of my 1/2 ton, I could have settled on a V8 Colorado...

 

Reminds me I keep hearing the GMT 900 received styling ques from the Colorado and I just can't see it... Beyond the typical GM styling anyways. Large horizontal grille bar, stacked head lights...

Posted

Towing capacity will go up to 5500 lbs for 2008 EC and CC Canyons and Colorados with the I5. I would expect the 5.3 to be about the same.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I agree. Back in 2000 I originally wanted the Silverado, but the sticker was just too much at the time. I bought my new S-10 ex cab 4x4 for ~ $12k less than the comparably equipped Silverado.

 

Now the difference is no where near as much since the Colorado/Canyon are so expensive relative to the S-10's and the great rebates on the full size trucks with everyone afraid of gas prices.

 

I am much happier with my Sierra over my S-10. The only thing I liked better about my S-10 is that it would fit into the garrage. In fact the Sierra gets about the same mileage on the highway as the S-10 got.

 

Also for towing a full size just handles so much better when pulling a load even if the power is there on the mid-size.

 

Now, for someone looking for a fast truck the Colorado/Canyon with a 5.3L would be very quick. Top that off with a supercharger and hold on. You would also have the practicality of a pick-up (unlike the SSR) and still be able to go insanely fast.

Posted

I'm not saying the Colorados and Canyons are bad rides, but they don't have much to offer when compared to the Nissan and Toyota competitors and sell at a higher price. With exception of the new V8, the I5 is much less powerful than the other V6s.

 

Like I said, I'm not saying its a bad ride, its just not in the same league as the others. Again, this is my opinion.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,836
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    hotfish
    Newest Member
    hotfish
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 659 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did you ever get this worked out? Mike is doing the two start thing now too. This is after a new camera back in December. 
    • I’m doing an experiment on a vehicle I don’t have much money in. I’m going by the premise that after they last 100K miles they were no mechanical problems with assembly. Or defects with the parts. With oil changes by the minder for the first 127K miles when I acquired it. I quickly went through low mileage oil changes then settled on 5k oil changes with close to 170K miles on the vehicle currently. I did have the option to turn off the cylinder deactivation. I didn’t on this vehicle because in ECONOMY mode at least half the time. It should be a no brainer frequent oil changes are the key. The manufacturer gets away with the long oil changes with its severe service  maintenance. Just ask them what is normal. 
    • Even set to "recirculated", the air pushes out and is hot. I have noticed that sometime it doesn't want to switch between recirculated/vented air. Say it is set to Circulated Air and I want to switch to Vented, when I click the Vented button, it just quickly lights up/clicks and immediatly switches back to Circulated. It's done this a few times now. So maybe it is an actuator getting stuck? But then, that doesn't explain the hot air when everything is off does it?
    • I wonder what the price is out at the coast, Big Sur or other out of the way locations as I bet they are charging quite a premium over the in land pumps. 
    • Were you looking at the HD trucks on the GM website or the half tons as that makes all the difference. As far as I know there are only two options for the HD trucks and that is the standard 2 speed transfer case or the 2 speed transfer case that has the added 4 high auto feature and they put that transfer case by default into the LTZ and High Country although its optional in the LT and not sure if its available in the work trucks.    The half tons, that is where its been a total mess in my estimation for a few years now with most trucks below the top trim having the single speed transfer case as standard but with the option of having the two speed such as one would get by choosing the Z71 package, however then not being able to get the two speed transfer case with the towing package unless it was a higher trim truck AND had the 6.2 gas so one could combine the towing package gearing diffs with the two speed transfer case. Having said that if its a trail boss package then it gets the two speed transfer case but not necessarily able to get the tow package as it would depend on trim level and engine chosen. Believe me, people have bought the GM half tons assuming "of course it will have a two speed transfer case" only to find out after when they really pay attention to what they now own .... crap, there is NO low range !.    I don't believe Ford or Ram have gone that way yet with their half tons but like I say its been a few years now that GM has done this with the half tons. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...