Jump to content

Fuel Mileage With Cap Or Cover?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been wanting to add a shell or nice bed cover to my truck. If you go and read what the bed cover manufacturers say on their websites, they all say their products increase MPG by some magic number (most use 10%) Some of them say that a camper shell actually decreases your mileage by as much as 10%...

 

I don't really want to lose any fuel economy. In the 2900 miles I have had my truck the DIC says I have gotten exactly 16 mpg. Not awful but not a figure I want to see go down! I have an order placed for a Leer 100XQ shell but it hasn't been built yet so it isn't too late to change plans.

 

Anybody got any input?

 

Thanks in advance.

Posted

Much of what a cap does to aerodynamics (and fuel economy) depends on the height profile. Keep it to cab-height and it helps alot. Had a taller wedge-shaped cap on a Dakota and could feel the front end get loose at high speeds. That kind drag must cut into fuel economy.

 

On the tonneau covers, could tell from the high-speed distortion of the soft-top on my last Chevy that it's keeping a significant amount of air from catching the tailgate. Currently running a folding hard tonneau on this NBS and seeing a lifetime ave 17.3 on the DIC since new.

Posted

I have a 2007 Sierra, 4.8L Regular Cab, and I'm averaging somewhere in the 15 MPG range with my normal city driving and 17" wheels, no performance mods (no cap or bed cover, either).

 

I'm not all that pleased, considering my truck has had 89 octane gas since day 1.

Posted

Not sure of the cap/cover.

 

But did you guys see the mythbusters episode re. the tailgate up or down. They proved twice you get better mileage with it up. Moving air starts to rotate in between the cab and the gate and the air coming over the cab just flows over that bubble. With the gate down it was just all turbulence vs smooth flowing air.

Posted
I'm not all that pleased, considering my truck has had 89 octane gas since day 1.

I would think my RCSB would get better than 16. Pretty bad if you ask me.

 

Guys can i ask what size rims you both have. Im doing a comparision, becuase im getting 19MPG AVE

I have 20 inch wheels and 275-55-20 Pirellis.

 

But did you guys see the mythbusters episode re. the tailgate up or down. They proved twice you get better mileage with it up.

I saw that too. Aerodynamics aren't always as obvious as they look.

Posted

in theory a large diameter rim/tire combo should be better for freeway riving becuase it will reduce the rpms of the vehicle, but still working on it.

Posted
in theory a large diameter rim/tire combo should be better for freeway riving becuase it will reduce the rpms of the vehicle, but still working on it.

True, but it's more rotational mass to keep moving.

Posted
Zembonez I think you'd be the first nnbs Silverado ever with a big camper shell and 20's. :thumbs:

If I do it, I'll be getting something slick like I had on Fred...

 

Fred0111.jpg

 

This was Barney in 05

 

barney0111.jpg

Posted

That is pretty slick actually! Maybe Wingnut will give into buying some 20's??

 

What % tint is that??? My G/F wants get my driver/pass. windows tinted for christmas. Rear window is factory tinted.

Posted
That is pretty slick actually! Maybe Wingnut will give into buying some 20's??

 

What % tint is that??? My G/F wants get my driver/pass. windows tinted for christmas. Rear window is factory tinted.

I always use 20% on the fronts. You have to redo it before inspection though. (in Texas 35% is max) I just peel it off and go spend the 50 bucks at my shop. It's worth it. I like em dark so my wife can't see me with my G/F :thumbs:

 

OH and Wingnut will probably charge me for using a pic of his truck.

Posted
in theory a large diameter rim/tire combo should be better for freeway riving becuase it will reduce the rpms of the vehicle, but still working on it.

True, but it's more rotational mass to keep moving.

 

 

 

Well im trying find out if the extra MPG increase with the 20's will compesate for the weight.

Posted

IIRC At the end of the Mythbusters show they reported that tests done by other people, showed that a hard fiberglas tonneau cover reduced drag the most out of other types of caps and covers.

Posted
in theory a large diameter rim/tire combo should be better for freeway riving because it will reduce the rpms of the vehicle, but still working on it.

True, but it's more rotational mass to keep moving.

 

 

The tire & wheel size along with the gear ratio the MFR's install put the engine in the sweet spot of the torque band and larger or smaller tire sizes will move the highway RPM's out of the preferred RPM;s which is on the LS engines at 2000 RPM's.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,837
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    bellssn690
    Newest Member
    bellssn690
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 705 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...