Jump to content

2005 Yukon Denali Fuel/trip Computer Discrepancy


KVacek

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just bought a 2005 Yukon XL Denali with 37,000 miles. It was a lease vehicle, and is in beautiful condition, showing little wear for even 37,000 miles. Original Wrangler radials with about 40% wear left. I have no service records - nothing. Don't know if the lessee paid for OnStar or not.

 

Looking through the vehicle information displays, I found a fuel totalizer, indicating that the truck has used 5,008 gallons of fuel, and the average MPG was 14.9. That would be fine if the truck had about 75,000 miles, but not for 37,000 miles.

 

Is it possible / practical that the computer has been hacked, or is there some other explanation for the discrepancy ?

 

Thanks in advance !

Karl

Posted

The 'fuel used' in the DIC isn't completely accurate. But I've never seen one go that long without being reset though. I normally reset mine after each fill up and it tends to be off by about a gallon or so. So I can imagine it being "off" after 37k. :cheers:

 

I'd just reset it.

Posted
The 'fuel used' in the DIC isn't completely accurate. But I've never seen one go that long without being reset though. I normally reset mine after each fill up and it tends to be off by about a gallon or so. So I can imagine it being "off" after 37k. :cheers:

 

I'd just reset it.

Resetting the DIC doesn't reset the fuel used reading on mine. Mine is inaccurate as well. It shows 16.6 MPG for 4500 miles but says I used 298 gallons... which would be 15.1. Doing the math at fillups, the 16.6 is correct. Not sure why the fuel used number is wrong?

Posted

Just an idea...But maybe it's figuring idle-time into the equation. The truck is essentially getting 0 mpg when idling. Obviously, it's not using much gas at all, but your MPG in the DIC will drop like a rock when it idles.

 

Not sure how much it would drop it in the overall, but you can also divide total mileage by total hours and figure out the average MPH for the vehicle. If it's low, you know it spent a lot of time idling.

 

Like I said...Just a thought.

Posted
Just an idea...But maybe it's figuring idle-time into the equation. The truck is essentially getting 0 mpg when idling. Obviously, it's not using much gas at all, but your MPG in the DIC will drop like a rock when it idles.

 

Not sure how much it would drop it in the overall, but you can also divide total mileage by total hours and figure out the average MPH for the vehicle. If it's low, you know it spent a lot of time idling.

 

Like I said...Just a thought.

 

Engine hours have clearly been reset - it only shows 152 hours. I suspect that MPG has also been reset, but of course I don't know. The trip computers had definitely been reset at least occasionally.

 

My main questions are whether it's likely that the "fuel used" is that far off, and if not, is it likely that the actual mileage can be determined by a dealer even if someone reset the visible odometer with software ? That is, does the computer ALWAYS keep an accurate total mileage, or does the "odometer resetter" software reset EVERYTHING in the computer.

 

I bought from an independent wholesaler who got the vehicle from the leasing company that leased it from new. My suspicion is that the lessee might have reset the odometer to avoid over-mileage charges. Then again, he was careful enough to replace the tires with OE tires and they do look like 37,000-mile tires. Pedal wear is negligible, and the vehicle is very clean with no evidence of any significant reconditioning beyond a basic detailing. Looks to me like the mileage is correct, but then again, it might not look much different with say, 77,000 miles vs 37,000 miles.

Posted

Here is the deal there are people out their that can and will for a fee hook up a laptop to your data link connector and put what ever milage and hours you want on your vec. Being it was a lease that does throw a red flag up. If you pm your vin I'll do a gm history check for you so you can see what has been done to the vec at the owners local dealer. This would include date, milage, and what work was done. :cheers:

Posted
Here is the deal there are people out their that can and will for a fee hook up a laptop to your data link connector and put what ever milage and hours you want on your vec. Being it was a lease that does throw a red flag up. If you pm your vin I'll do a gm history check for you so you can see what has been done to the vec at the owners local dealer. This would include date, milage, and what work was done. :cheers:

 

Thanks for the offer - I just read your reply, but that's exactly what I got this morning. Mystery solved - the mileage at each repair all tracks just fine. There was a dashboard mod ule warrantee replaced last April and I suspect the "fuel used" on the exchange one installed was not zeroed out when it was "rebuilt". That also explains why the engine hours were so low - assuming engine hours were zeroed when the module was replaced, 152 engine hours since April sounds fine.

 

Thanks again !

Karl

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No I didn’t watch a video of a person who analyzes oil for a living explain general oil usage. For clarity I did ask my brothers one who runs our equipment business. The other who runs our old ROW business about oil usage. Nothing has changed since I retired. Their personal vehicles or work vehicles use no oil. Not enough to see on the oil checking device. Then I pondered. I like to ponder. In this extended oil changing world with oil change countdowns or lights. If engines used say a qt every 2500 miles or up to even 4000 miles. With oil changes reaching as high as 15000 miles. Normal for most people is eight to ten. Vehicles should potentially be seizing up all over the place. Especially in hilly terrain. Just how many people actually check their oil? Maybe 10 percent. Those are the people that probably change their oil early. I like to research used car listings. I have five favorite dealers I check. They all list carfax with their listing. It’s rare to see vehicles with anything but extended oil changes. Transmission service, forget about it. I’ve seen Honda and Toyota certified vehicles up to 100K miles and ten years old. With nothing but normal maintenance. Isn’t nice we all have different experiences and believe our way is the best. You certainly get backup for whatever you believe. Life would be boring otherwise.
    • Interesting rumor. Dealers near me have been tight-lipped so far, but if this reveal actually happens next week, I'm really hoping they finally give the HD a proper interior overhaul. The competition has been eating their lunch in the cabin department for a while now.
    • There are a few good takeaways in that video that pertain to this thread, certainly the possibility of the oil control rings having buildup, the fuel injectors and how clean or not that they are ending up affecting the pistons rings carbon buildup, and the fact that its normal up to a point for a given engine to use some oil, and that the oil quality that is being utilized is part of that ring clogging up issue as well.   I was talking with a neighbor yesterday who has a baby LZ0 duramax and he had bought it slightly used but it does consume some oil and he has switched over to 5W-30 Euro spec oil and in this case that never made a difference in consumption over the factory 0W-20 recommendation. He finds it uses a quart in about 3500 miles and as he goes a ways over that distance he adds oil to full and goes another 1000 miles or so and then changes oil and is typically at 40% or so left on the oil monitor at that point with his use case of quite a lot of highway miles and more limited in short run use. I don't know what other LZ0 engines are doing for oil consumption but that is what his is doing. 
    • I dont care what Lake says. Goodnight. 
    • Ok well I guess Lake disagrees with me on a few points. I call oil consumption pretty basic. Rudimentary. He calls it "really complicated." I think 1qt consumed in 3k miles is a lot. He says that's normal. In 22 minutes, he'll use his natural talent to explain oil consumption to anyone watching this video. He covers everything from obvious engine damage to how normally functioning healthy engines consume oil by design. Lake explicitly states how you drive will impact oil consumption.   Shut up and watch:    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...