Jump to content

Brakes: Soft Or Not?


crestapre2

Recommended Posts

Posted

OK guys I'm new to this forum and to large GM vehicles.

My last SUV was a Toyota 4Runner.

When I hit the brakes in the 4Runner they would grab and I could throw you into the dash if I jambed them on.

 

I recently purchased a 2005 Yukon and the brakes feel soft to me. I've had two GMC dealers and a Meineke tell me that they just have the "GM" brake feel and that they look fine. The vehicle seems to slow and stop ok in regular traffic but I am concerned about an emergency stop. I've tried to jamb the brakes but it doesn't stop the way that I would like.

 

I also tow a large boat and am very concern that I won't even be able to stop it.

 

Any info out there?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have the same question. I bought a 2005 Yukon Denali with the 6.0 liter for towing a horse trailer and race car trailer. But the brakes feel soft. And coming out of Asheville, NC one time I about burned them out - could smell them and started to viberate. I don't ride the brakes, but it seemed I had to push hard for effective braking. And had no trailer. While the towing capacity is rated high enough, I'm convinced that I won't be able to slow as fast as the vehicle in front of me. Is there an upgrade that I need to look into? I heard that in 2005 the brake system was changed and it would improve braking for towing. Tell me the key components I need to check out. Thanks!

Posted

Here's an update and everything seems good! Mine were not spongy as if they needed bleeding. They just seemed to have diminishing returns when I had to start pushing down hard. I talked to a shop and in my case, I have 20" rims on a vehicle and brake system designed for 16" rims. It makes sense that the larger diameter reduces the stopping power just a bit. As in lever arm mechanics, the load distance is increased from the disc thus giving the disc less leverage. I recently hauled a heavily loaded 22' race trailer to Asheville and it was fine. I was actually impressed. I had to unload some stuff before leaving because it weighed in at 8940 lbs with a 1340 tongue weight. I'm thinking I ended up around 8000 lbs with a 900 lbs tongue weight. Just a guess. Got about 11 mpg avg at 60 mph avg.

Posted

Consider upgrading your brake system. Slotted rotors, at least ceramic pads, etc. etc. I don't know about the availability of aftermarket brake systems (Baer, etc.) for trucks, but they may exist.

 

FYI, when towing a trailer, you WONT stop as quickly as the vehicle in front of you. This is why you should at least double, if not triple the normal following distance and slow your speed.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • AMSOIL SS is about prevention and it is very good at it's job. I've never seen it claim to be a cleaner however like Valvoline R&P. Almost any oil that has some Ester or Alkylated Naphthalene in sufficient quantity will do a good job at keeping the rings functional.     I see the market splint among these types in two groups; those that use the same tech in every weight grade and those that reserve the tech for the EPA (EPA) friendly grades. Mobil 1 for example keeps the Advanced Clean chemistry out of the SAE 40 and up weights. Other like HPL (top shelf group and No-VII), Red Line HP, TORCO, MPT30K use the tech in all grades. Just not something the Wally World oils are into. 
    • Max Trailering Package.  RPO code NHT.   includes 3500 HD Frame, 3500 HD Leaf Springs, 12" Rear axle and 3500 HD Shock Package.   GVWR goes to 11,750lbs for crew cab standard box 4x4, 11,900lbs for crew cab long box 4x4.  2WD crew standard is 11,500lbs, 11,550lbs crew long 2wd, and 11,450lbs on regular and double cab 4x4.       There is also NHT on 1 ton dually regular cab 2WD.  includes 3500 HD Frame, 3500 HD Leaf Springs, (F60) Heavy Duty Front Spring/Camper Package, 12" Rear axle, 3500 HD Shock Package, and Z6A Gooseneck / 5th Wheel Prep provisions with bed stamped holes and caps.  GVWR of 14,000lbs.    
    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/general/what-makes-this-1963-ford-falcon-red-rocket-special/vi-AA2asoRz?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=be9c1b4f79ff4211c526abd60f6da012&ei=16
    • True. My statement needs qualification. "For a shade tree mechanic, re-assembling the front engine to achieve a rough baseline timing of 0 degrees, as is approximated and indicated by common visual indicator mark alignment, measured with a human eye capable of 20/20 vision *with correction, I am reasonably confident that I have followed the outlined procedures/ prescribed methods for verifying baseline timing."   😉   In the end, the computer sets the timing, it's continuously variable based on sensor input, and the distributor only has a degree or two of physical adjustability intended for dialing in the final setting for cam ****** once everything is back together. But even that final value is acceptable within, I believe, +/- 3 degrees.   I thought my exhaust project was going to be a bear. To my surprise, the old clamps came right off last night, and I was able to unbolt all the hangers instead of having to muscle the rubber mounts. The old cat is ready to slip off the factory y-pipe. The rest is ready to come out with one or two cuts, and I've got a fresh blade waiting. I love living where rust isn't a thing.    
    • I work at a Chevrolet dealership & hear it all believe me.  Just reads like there's going to be a fist fight over filters.  Can't get enough, continue!!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...