Jump to content

4.8 or 5.3

Guest Friz

By Guest Friz
in Gen III & Gen IV V8 Engines (LS-Based)

Recommended Posts

Stepside Z Senior Enthusiast

Stepside Z

Posted
Posted

I have been looking at new trucks for quite some time now. I considered a new Duramax but when all factors are considered I have decided against it. My current truck has a 4.8 and seems to have good power and fuel economy. I tried a new reg cab stepside today with 4.8/auto/3.73 and all desired options. My question is would you go with the 4.8 or order a new 5.3? Also I am interested in what kind of MPG you 5.3 guys are getting.

(Edited by Stepside Z at 10:23 pm on April 25, 2001)

Guest Friz

Guest Friz

Posted
Posted

There is no substitute for cubic inches (or liters in this case).

The 5.3 has a longer stroke, therefore should have more torque.

Shaners Senior Enthusiast

Shaners

Posted
Posted

The 5.3L litre has more torque and more HP and can tow about 1000 lbs. more than the 4.8 litre if both are equipped with Automatics.  Hp and torque for the 4.8 is 270 hp and 285ft llbs respectively.  The 5.3 is 285 hp and 325 ft lbs respectively.

I'm going to venture a guess and say the 4.8L will get slightly better mpg's.  I drive my 5.3L in town at least 80% of the time and go on short trips (it's a small town and I usually put less than 10 miles per day on it).  I average around 14 mpg's with the truck in my signature, and it has the 3.73 rear gears.

Guest Friz

Guest Friz

Posted
Posted

How does the 6.0 and 8.1 add to those numbers?

Shaners Senior Enthusiast

Shaners

Posted
Posted

The "old" 6.0L was rated at 300hp and 360 ft lbs of torque.  I believe that motor is now at 325 hp and I'll guess torque is up at least a little.

The 8.1L is 340 hp and 455 ft lbs of torque!!!

And the 6.6L diesel is 300 hp and 520 ft lbs. of torqe!!!

What a line up of stump pulling power!!!

Shaners Senior Enthusiast

Shaners

Posted
Posted

I think the new 6.0's are available now in trucks like the 1500HD.  There is even a higher output version in the Escalade (Caddy) and GMC C3.  Somewhere in the neighborhood of 340-345 hp.

I'll have to check, but the newer 325 hp is more than likely the stock motor in the 2500HD's also.

OK, I checked it out...

The stock motor in the 2500HD is the newer 6.0L rated at 325 hp and 355 ft lbs of torque.  This would be the current 2001 model, I'm assuming the switch to the newer 6.0L took place at the beginning of that production year, but I have no way of really knowing that for sure.

Guest Friz

Guest Friz

Posted
Posted

So here's what we've got on the current GM motors:

               hp         torque(lb.ft.)

4.8           270        285

5.3           285        325

6.0(old)   300        360

6.0(new) 325        355

8.1           340        455

6.6(dsl)   300        520

I hope this is right. If so, it is impressive.

Stepside Z Senior Enthusiast

Stepside Z

Posted
Posted

I may go with the reg cab, stepside, Z71, 4.8. I don't tow or haul anything so I feel the truck will work out fine for me. I will keep you all posted.

  • 2 weeks later...
HiG4s Enthusiast

HiG4s

Posted
Posted

The big difference is you can get a 4.8 with a M-5 and the 5.3 has to have an auto.

The only mechanical difference from the 4.8 to the 5.3 is the crank. Change the crank on your 4.8 and you have a 5.3.

The only difference between the 5.3 and the 6.0 is the bore. Bore your 5.3 and you have a 6.0.

Guest Friz

Guest Friz

Posted
Posted
Quote: from HiG4s on 8:18 pm on May 9, 2001

The big difference is you can get a 4.8 with a M-5 and the 5.3 has to have an auto.

The only mechanical difference from the 4.8 to the 5.3 is the crank. Change the crank on your 4.8 and you have a 5.3.

The only difference between the 5.3 and the 6.0 is the bore. Bore your 5.3 and you have a 6.0.

Okay, new GM experts. I need to go to school here. It has been my understanding that the 4.8, 5.3, and 6.0 are all small block V-8 engines with the new Vortec head design. The displacements were altered to make the most efficient bore/stroke designs. I was told over at PUTC that it is a totally new block design as well.

Who's right?

HiG4s Enthusiast

HiG4s

Posted
Posted

Well yes and no, it is basically a gm small block, but it is actually a cast iron version of the Z28/Trans Am/ Vette LS1 engine block which IS a different casting and will not interchange all parts with previous LT1 castings.

If you go back through the years many times there have been "completely new" blocks which a few years later were considered a variation of the basic GM small block. So I guess it is a matter of perspective.

tstranik Enthusiast

tstranik

Posted
Posted

>So here's what we've got on the current GM motors:

>              hp         torque(lb.ft.)

>4.8           270        285

>5.3           285        325

>6.0(old)   300        360

>6.0(new) 325        355

>8.1           340        455

>6.6(dsl)   300        520

I'm pretty sure the 6.0 has 370 Ft*Lbs of Torque.

  • 4 months later...
vhato Enthusiast

vhato

Posted
Posted

TO add more to the mess of comparos, The 6.0l engine has iron heads and a few other minor differences in valve actuation.  On paper it only has a larger bore over the 5.3

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Tyler Gibbs
      Travel Trailer 2024 2500 HD 6.6 Gas Engine ?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • sFrank
      2026 Silverado Range AFM DFM ECU loaction

      By sFrank · Posted

      So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • No F-bdy Bs
      Dave's Auto (custom engine builder) tear down of L8T

      By No F-bdy Bs · Posted

      Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
    • Donstar
      Navigating senior years.

      By Donstar · Posted

      "Life is getting back to normal."    I'm driving again and all new joints are operating as expected for this stage of recovery.   My most recent joint replacement still requires a lot of attention but experience has taught me that time will quiet the remaining pain.  I joked with my surgeon that another joint replacement would take my mind off my most recent surgery and he responded by saying the next will be a hip!  There are no plans for another surgery but, unlike me, I don't think he was joking!  I certainly wouldn't refuse further replacement  if required but hope to spend time out of the "post-op"  period.  I can't stress enough that if you have been recommended for total hip, knee or shoulder replacement that you welcome the offer.  Post-op "recovery" may sound daunting and painful, however, this is far better than the insidious erosion of mobility you are currently experiencing.  Imagine what it would feel like to wake up most mornings feeling better and more mobile than you did the previous day!  Prior to my first surgery in June 2025, even getting out of bed was becoming a formidable task.  Since the day after my first surgery, I get out of bed everyday easily and unassisted.  Making the switch to feeling a little better each day rather than a little worse, is hugely motivating!
    • Coastie05
      ‘25 Silverado purchase- back to dealership for bumper/radio issue

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      Hope it all works out for you. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...