Jump to content

2005 Tahoe Rear Diff Fluid Change Help


Recommended Posts

Posted

I changed the gasket and refilled with Amsoil 75/90 syn gear oil. I put about 3 and 1/4 quarts and it did not leak out and I can not feel the fluid when I test for the level. It still may be 1 inch or so below the fill hole. Should I keep adding fliud. I only test drove it and it seemed OK.

Posted

it will work, but i'd keep putting it in until it spills out.

 

less fluid capacity ---> less heat sink ----> higher temps ----> accelerated wear ----> increased risk of failure.

Posted
I changed the gasket and refilled with Amsoil 75/90 syn gear oil. I put about 3 and 1/4 quarts and it did not leak out and I can not feel the fluid when I test for the level. It still may be 1 inch or so below the fill hole. Should I keep adding fliud. I only test drove it and it seemed OK.

 

 

You can fill it until it comes out of the hole but you run the risk of causing seal leaks at the wheels. GM recommends the gear oil be apprx 5/8" below the fill hole. This would mean you could possibly touch it with your finger but I use a cable tie bent on the end to make it into a "dip stick".

 

As Travis said, you want all that is supposed to be in there as it helps control heat but you do not want it overfilled.

Posted

wait a second....how does oil in a diff cause seal leaks at the wheels?

 

these things have big hollow axles that carry oil out to the wheel bearings or something?

Posted

Yes,

 

The oil in the diff flows in the axle tubes right out to the wheels. If it is overfilled, there is more oil present in the axle tubes creating a higher risk of leaks at the wheel seals.

 

I am not sure all vehicles specify 5/8" below the fill hole but I know GM does on our trucks.

Posted

why would that cause a seal failure though? i can see how more fluid creates slightly increased pressure in the system, but i have a hard time accepting that the marginal difference in pressure resulting from an extra half a quart of oil directly causes the seal failure. if there is an oil leak (and this is a very strange system to me) the seal has either already failed, or it was horribly engineered to begin with.

Posted

I am certainly no engineer and not sure the following answer will explain this correctly.

 

If the proper amt of gear oil would be 1/4"(just using this as an example) deep in the axle tubes and the bottom lip of the seal where it rides on the axle, rests 1/2" from the bottom of the tube this would mean gear oil would only be getting to the seal from splash. If the gear oil was 1" deep in the axle tubes, the gear oil would be above the seal line at all times. Now with heat, splash, horizontal axle movement, etc, there is a greater chance of the gear oil getting between the seal and the axle causing a leak.

 

Again, I did not engineer the system and am sure my explanation could be flawed. However, I researched this before I changed my gear oil and differential cover and discovered that the recommended fluid fill is approx 5/8" below the fill hole.

 

I also noticed the fill hole in my PMC alum cover is apprx 5/8" below the OE fill hole in the diff housing. For this reason, I can fill mine to the gear oil runs out of the hole in the cover and it leaves the level about 5/8" below the OE hole in the diff housing itself.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...