Jump to content

LT-1 350 VS Vortec 350


Recommended Posts

Posted

A big one is that the LT-1 has reverse flow cooling, with the water pump driven by the camshaft.  Also the heads are different...Vortec heads are great low-end torque heads, and can make some pretty good HP, but are cast iron.  LT-1 heads are aluminum (except on Impala SS engines) and are a higher RPM peak design, and I think the valves are larger as well.

I know the LT-1 is a full roller cammed engine, pretty sure the Vortec 350 is as well but not positive.

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Vortec has coil-on-cylinder distributorless technology.

Also, it's not throttle body injection, it's sequential multi-port FI.

Jeff

  • 2 months later...
Posted

As previously mentioned, the F- and Y-body LT1s got aluminum heads, but they actually flow worse than the B-body iron LT1 heads and the Vortec heads (which have nearly identical port and chamber designs).  

 

The LT1 also has a tunnel-ram intake, designed specifically to fit under the cowl of the 4th-gen F-body.  This is also the main reason for the location of the Opti-spark distributor, which is mounted at the front of engine and driven directly off the end of the camshaft (the waterpump is located slightly above this, and driven from a jackshaft off the cam timing sprocket).  The distributor has a pair of optical sensors for high-resolution and low-resolution sensing of cam position.  

 

Due to the reverse-flow cooling, the LT1 runs slightly higher compression (10:1 in the B-body LT1 and 10.5 in the F-/Y-body LT1, compared to 9.4:1 in the Vortec if I'm not mistaken).

 

Basically, the following components are different:

 

Block

Heads

Intake

Timing cover

Timing chain/sprockets

Water pump

Distributor

 

Much of the internals (crank, rods, pistons, oil pump, bearings, cam, valvetrain) are interchangable between the LT1, Vortec 350, and standard late-model SBC 350 with little or no modification.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No I didn’t watch a video of a person who analyzes oil for a living explain general oil usage. For clarity I did ask my brothers one who runs our equipment business. The other who runs our old ROW business about oil usage. Nothing has changed since I retired. Their personal vehicles or work vehicles use no oil. Not enough to see on the oil checking device. Then I pondered. I like to ponder. In this extended oil changing world with oil change countdowns or lights. If engines used say a qt every 2500 miles or up to even 4000 miles. With oil changes reaching as high as 15000 miles. Normal for most people is eight to ten. Vehicles should potentially be seizing up all over the place. Especially in hilly terrain. Just how many people actually check their oil? Maybe 10 percent. Those are the people that probably change their oil early. I like to research used car listings. I have five favorite dealers I check. They all list carfax with their listing. It’s rare to see vehicles with anything but extended oil changes. Transmission service, forget about it. I’ve seen Honda and Toyota certified vehicles up to 100K miles and ten years old. With nothing but normal maintenance. Isn’t nice we all have different experiences and believe our way is the best. You certainly get backup for whatever you believe. Life would be boring otherwise.
    • Interesting rumor. Dealers near me have been tight-lipped so far, but if this reveal actually happens next week, I'm really hoping they finally give the HD a proper interior overhaul. The competition has been eating their lunch in the cabin department for a while now.
    • There are a few good takeaways in that video that pertain to this thread, certainly the possibility of the oil control rings having buildup, the fuel injectors and how clean or not that they are ending up affecting the pistons rings carbon buildup, and the fact that its normal up to a point for a given engine to use some oil, and that the oil quality that is being utilized is part of that ring clogging up issue as well.   I was talking with a neighbor yesterday who has a baby LZ0 duramax and he had bought it slightly used but it does consume some oil and he has switched over to 5W-30 Euro spec oil and in this case that never made a difference in consumption over the factory 0W-20 recommendation. He finds it uses a quart in about 3500 miles and as he goes a ways over that distance he adds oil to full and goes another 1000 miles or so and then changes oil and is typically at 40% or so left on the oil monitor at that point with his use case of quite a lot of highway miles and more limited in short run use. I don't know what other LZ0 engines are doing for oil consumption but that is what his is doing. 
    • I dont care what Lake says. Goodnight. 
    • Ok well I guess Lake disagrees with me on a few points. I call oil consumption pretty basic. Rudimentary. He calls it "really complicated." I think 1qt consumed in 3k miles is a lot. He says that's normal. In 22 minutes, he'll use his natural talent to explain oil consumption to anyone watching this video. He covers everything from obvious engine damage to how normally functioning healthy engines consume oil by design. Lake explicitly states how you drive will impact oil consumption.   Shut up and watch:    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...