Jump to content

Opps, I Did It Again


SnakeEyeSS

Recommended Posts

Posted

The 09 Corolla was for my wife, but I decided to get something myself. I started looking around and absolutely loved the new Mazda6. It is quite a car, very responsive, plenty of power, EXCELLENT interior, flawless fit and finish, and a design that in stunning in person(the pictures make them look awkward, I wasn't sure about it until I saw it with my own eyes).

 

I bought a Ebony black S Touring model, V6 and 6speed manumatic auto. You don't have to drive a mile before you can tell this was made buy some car guys. Firm but nice ride, responsive steering, and a great motor. The red white and blue lighted instruments on the Touring models are a great touch, I'm thinking they may have done that since the Mazda6 here is USA market only.

 

It's the most fun front wheel drive car I've ever driven, reminds me of my old BMW in some ways, ya know ,besides being nose heavy and the wrong wheels getting power!

 

I'll post good pics as soon as I can get home in daylight! Here are some mazda website photos and a couple of the interior. In encourage you to head to mazdausa.com and check out the interior 360 view for a better look, being so dark the pics don't look very good.

 

front.jpg

back.jpg

Gotta love that in-bumper exhaust!

exhaust.jpg

 

int.jpg

intp.jpg

 

EDIT:Answers to reply's your about to read:

After driving it the last two days, I love it more everyday. Very satisfied with my purchase.

 

I looked at at getting a new red tagged 08 Z71. No offense to anyone, but the 09 Mazda6 is in a totally different class in interior quality. Even the noises the electronics(blinker click, multi-tone start up chime, etc) exhume quality. The closest GM gets is the 08 Malibu. Almost everything is soft touch, basically no seams at all. the cloth trim feels like velvet, and the "Marble look" trim pieces in the middle of the dash and around the armrest and shifter look excellent, if nothing like marble!

 

And yes, those exhaust tips in the bumper is metal, not plastic.

 

And about the V6....the interesting thing is mazda products are using the Motor first(CX-9, Mazda6)....which makes me think Ford just stole/bought it. Considering their comparable cars are released a year after Mazda's

Posted

It's a good looking car. Let's hope Mazda has fixed some of their resale issues. If so... you made a pretty good buy there.

 

edit: SWEET interior. Why can't we get that in an American car? I test drove an 08 Vette just this week. The interior plastic looked like something out of an early 90s Camaro. Why the hell can't we do better? My frikkin 2009 Scion xB (Japanese made Japanese car) has better interior quality than my damn truck! The seat cloth, the dash, the door trim... WTF? The plastic in my truck looks like a 5 dollar plastic football.

 

WHY THE PHUCK CAN'T WE AMERICANS DO BETTER?

 

You know we can. Why don't we?

 

Think this just MIGHT be one of the reasons the big 3 are ****ed right now?

 

MAYBE?

Posted
Not too bad for a Ford. :thumbs:

Well... Ford owns a portion of Mazda. As of November it was 13%. Not exactly controlling interest.

 

http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2008/11/18/247942.html

 

 

I was just giving him a little shit. I wasn't implying it was like one of the trucks or the Tribute which are all Ford. :lol:

 

Yeah... sorry Tobias. That was a little Jeff like. :D

Posted
Not too bad for a Ford. :thumbs:

Well... Ford owns a portion of Mazda. As of November it was 13%. Not exactly controlling interest.

 

http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2008/11/18/247942.html

 

 

I was just giving him a little shit. I wasn't implying it was like one of the trucks or the Tribute which are all Ford. :lol:

 

Yeah... sorry Tobias. That was a little Jeff like. :D

 

 

Whatever.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:dunno:

Posted
Not too bad for a Ford. :thumbs:

Well... Ford owns a portion of Mazda. As of November it was 13%. Not exactly controlling interest.

 

http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2008/11/18/247942.html

 

 

I was just giving him a little shit. I wasn't implying it was like one of the trucks or the Tribute which are all Ford. :lol:

 

Yeah... sorry Tobias. That was a little Jeff like. :D

 

 

Whatever.

 

Nice avatar.

Posted

Not a fan of the rear end, looks like a smooshed Corolla to me. Good luck with it though, Mazda seems to be making some great cars recently, the 3 has been getting some awesome reviews. I'm trying to convince my dad to get the 5 door 3 when his Civic finally eats shit.

Posted
Not too bad for a Ford. :thumbs:

Well... Ford owns a portion of Mazda. As of November it was 13%. Not exactly controlling interest.

 

http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2008/11/18/247942.html

 

 

I was just giving him a little shit. I wasn't implying it was like one of the trucks or the Tribute which are all Ford. :dunno:

 

Yeah... sorry Tobias. That was a little Jeff like. :D

 

 

Whatever.

 

Nice avatar.

 

 

:lol:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,914
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    AidenVorpagel
    Newest Member
    AidenVorpagel
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 874 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...