Jump to content

2003 Yukon Horrible Mpgs

sagent

Recommended Posts

sagent Enthusiast

sagent

Posted
Posted

My 2003 Yukon has been consistently getting horrible gas milage. Lately its been about 9.5 mpg around town with my wife driving it. It's the short version ( non xl) with a flex-fuel 5.3 L and 3.73 gears. The truck has about 115,000 miles and I bought it with about 95,000. I've changed all fluids to Amsoil and have lately been running Mobil 1 0w-30 in the crankcase. The truck has stabilitrac and came with the borg warner 4482 full time 4wd transfer case ( rpo code NR4 ). I would like to know if anyone else on the forum has a similar suv with this drive train configuration and what they are getting for milage in order to compare.

 

Other than the milage the truck runs perfect and has had all scheduled service performed, new plugs / wires / good tire pressures & no check engine light.

 

The only reason I think the is a problem is that my fathers 01 Yukon Denali has been getting about 3 mpgs better throught its life. The only thing I can think of is maybe the fuel composition sensor is malfunctioning causing it to burn gasoline as it would burn E85.

jrrod2004 Senior Enthusiast

jrrod2004

Posted
Posted
My 2003 Yukon has been consistently getting horrible gas milage. Lately its been about 9.5 mpg around town with my wife driving it. It's the short version ( non xl) with a flex-fuel 5.3 L and 3.73 gears. The truck has about 115,000 miles and I bought it with about 95,000. I've changed all fluids to Amsoil and have lately been running Mobil 1 0w-30 in the crankcase. The truck has stabilitrac and came with the borg warner 4482 full time 4wd transfer case ( rpo code NR4 ). I would like to know if anyone else on the forum has a similar suv with this drive train configuration and what they are getting for milage in order to compare.

 

Other than the milage the truck runs perfect and has had all scheduled service performed, new plugs / wires / good tire pressures & no check engine light.

 

The only reason I think the is a problem is that my fathers 01 Yukon Denali has been getting about 3 mpgs better throught its life. The only thing I can think of is maybe the fuel composition sensor is malfunctioning causing it to burn gasoline as it would burn E85.

 

 

I would change the O2 sensors, then I would seafoam it (if you haven't already done that), change the oil and then disconnect the battery to remove the old adaptive settings. Then take it out for a drive (anywhere from 25-150 miles) and you should start to see its mileage improve. I would check to make sure it is not running rich as this can be wasteful... others will chime in as well.

Draenor Senior Enthusiast

Draenor

Posted
Posted
My 2003 Yukon has been consistently getting horrible gas milage. Lately its been about 9.5 mpg around town with my wife driving it. It's the short version ( non xl) with a flex-fuel 5.3 L and 3.73 gears. The truck has about 115,000 miles and I bought it with about 95,000. I've changed all fluids to Amsoil and have lately been running Mobil 1 0w-30 in the crankcase. The truck has stabilitrac and came with the borg warner 4482 full time 4wd transfer case ( rpo code NR4 ). I would like to know if anyone else on the forum has a similar suv with this drive train configuration and what they are getting for milage in order to compare.

 

Other than the milage the truck runs perfect and has had all scheduled service performed, new plugs / wires / good tire pressures & no check engine light.

 

The only reason I think the is a problem is that my fathers 01 Yukon Denali has been getting about 3 mpgs better throught its life. The only thing I can think of is maybe the fuel composition sensor is malfunctioning causing it to burn gasoline as it would burn E85.

 

 

I would change the O2 sensors, then I would seafoam it (if you haven't already done that), change the oil and then disconnect the battery to remove the old adaptive settings. Then take it out for a drive (anywhere from 25-150 miles) and you should start to see its mileage improve. I would check to make sure it is not running rich as this can be wasteful... others will chime in as well.

 

+1 but minus the 02 sensors.(just for the moment as they are pricey to replace) IF you cant get a way to use or borrow a wideband, pull the plugs and see if there is an abundance of fuel on them.

C & A s Dad Senior Enthusiast

C & A s Dad

Posted
Posted

Seafoam it as said. Run a couple of tanks with some Chevron Techron and if you have not looked at the plugs and wires, I would replace them. I am sure you have already done the obvious, air filter, tire PSI, etc. etc.

 

My 02 Yuk XL (4.10 gear) is a 2 WD so maybe not a fair comparison but I averaging almost 18 right now with mixed rural and highway driving. This is real calculation, not the avg from the DIC.

DBVille Enthusiast

DBVille

Posted
Posted

Don't rely on the computer for mileage - check it the old fashioned way - write it down and divide it out. After checking all the normal suspects - plugs, air pressure, O2 sensors, what everyone else mentioned, there is one more thing.

 

The driver. Don't laugh. My wife gets worse fuel mileage than I, by at least 10%, in every vehicle we have - Suburban, Subaru, whatever. She accelerates faster, and brakes later than I do when on the street. We both run about the same speeds, but the acceleration kills mileage.

 

 

Edit: Yes, that is lousy mileage - our 2500 Suburban gets 10 mpg+ under almost all conditions, and it probably weighs close to 1,000 lbs more. Our 2000 Suburban got at least 12, and up to 16 mpg.

Porter_ Enthusiast

Porter_

Posted
Posted
Don't rely on the computer for mileage - check it the old fashioned way - write it down and divide it out. After checking all the normal suspects - plugs, air pressure, O2 sensors, what everyone else mentioned, there is one more thing.

 

that really is the old fashion way :D . instead of doing long division while you're sitting in front of the pump, save yourself some time and use your cell phone calculator. don't even need a pen and paper :rolleyes:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      Oil Consumption

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      Ok that confirms the extra quart theme they are still going with which must mean they have noted some initial use more so then some engines and probably the bigger factor in all of this probably isn't the engine so much as its the insane distance or OLM that lulls a lot of the driving public into driving their new vehicle off the lot and not even doing one short interval oil change because the manufacturer doesn't say different and if the dealer follows that logic as well. Selling the rarely needing to be serviced concept seems to go over well with the public that wants to get away with as little as possible for dollars spent on the vehicles maintenance and I bet there are 3.0 engines just like other vehicles out there that never have their oil checked by the owner which goes back to why they probably felt the need to add that extra quart to avoid a costly theme.    Speaking of cutting filters open, it was probably over two years ago now that a youtuber who buys vehicles to do longer term reviews and pulls a fifth wheel through the mountains of Colorado on summer trips and that becomes part of the testing. Anyway he had a GM HD with the 6.6 gas and a Ford 250 with the 7.3 gas at the same time and of no surprise the Ford had more power etc but somewhere along the way in the few thousand miles he put on the truck, he changed the oil and was seeing glitter and cut open the filter and yeah, things were not looking spectacular. The truck about that time or soon after seemed down on power compared to what it had been and then threw some engine code, I expect the cam/lifters were failing and so he brought the truck back to the dealer and made some deal to get out of it as he knew it would sit for months waiting on a new engine as they were so backlogged at the time. He kept the GM for some time after that using it exclusively until he sold it after buying his next vehicle to do a review on. Definitely the filter can tell a story when things are starting to go sideways, but it would be a sickening feeling to cut it open and be faced with an ugly mess like that and be running a magnet through the pleats and the oil on the dirty side of the filter and see all the fines sticking to the magnet.    The dealer may have some ideas based on experience as to where that coolant smell is coming from, I would imagine if they can't find it but its smelling they would put dye in it to they could give it a run cycle and use the black light to see where it pops up, if its a hose connection, water pump, rad or even a head gasket etc. 
    • riddler
      Torsion adjustment

      By riddler · Posted

      Good looking truck, suspensionmaxx looks like a solid option
    • riddler
      Torsion adjustment

      By riddler · Posted

      Thanks for the info, im considering a leveling kit or 4" lift kit.
    • davester
      frustrating P0446 code

      By davester · Posted

      charm.li (website) has the vehicle-specific diagnostic procedure for that code, you can use to find what the cause of it is.
    • KARNUT
      Oil Consumption

      By KARNUT · Posted

      It’s at the point of amusement. I’m retired I have time. It’s fun seeing people try to convince me I’m using oil. I’m buying oil at the prescribed time. It gets drained and new goes in. Do I add in between, no. My oil doesn’t even get dirty in 5k miles. I don’t even see any drop on the stick. I check in the same place. All is well.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...