Jump to content

Front And Rear Components Installation With 2 Channel Amp


Recommended Posts

Posted

Gentlemen,

 

I have a Rockford Fosgate P200.2 amp that is 2ohm stable. I plan on replacing the front and rear door speakers with 4 ohm components. My question is if I wire the left and right channels parallel changing the impendance to 2 ohm; Would this be better than using a 400 rms amp with 4 channels and keeping the impendance at 4ohm? Or would it make much difference?

 

My single 12" sub will be on another P300.1 amp.

 

Thanks in advance,

Posted

when you are talking about running parallel left and right, do you mean on two channels or one, because you will lose stereo sound if you do it the way I think you are talking about...If I read that right..

Posted
when you are talking about running parallel left and right, do you mean on two channels or one, because you will lose stereo sound if you do it the way I think you are talking about...If I read that right..

 

 

No, I would run the leftside front and rear parrallel as well as the rightside front and rear. Just like changing a DVC woofer 4 ohm to 2 ohm but do it with the components each side.

 

Since I posted this I have done a litttle more research and it seems I would get the power I need 100rms to power the components with the smaller two channel amp wiring the speakers in 2 ohm in lieu of 4 anyway. What I would lose would be the fader front to back.

 

One more question: Are the stock tweeters wired to the door speakers or tied in somewhere else in the channel?

 

Thanks for you response Kris,

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Do you think this width might affect the chalk test with a higher pressure closer to 65psi? I think lowering the pressure makes sense to get the tread to lay flatter
    • I had an alternator fail that was shorted internally in such a direct fashion in addition to the larger gauge cables that it appeared like a VERY dead battery. Granted I think the car did power up, it definitely wouldn't start.   Rodent damage to wiring?
    • ... I don't think he could.
    • Using experience to justify bad advice is lazy and typical of someone incapable of articulating why their advice is prudent.    This immediately sets off the BS alert and the advice that followed certainly qualified.   Asking an idiot for help getting out of dumb situations because he is an expert... at getting himself into dumb situations.   Unless I've been living in an alternate universe - the first thing everyone does when getting into a sticky situation is shift to a higher gear 🤨.   Of course not, the torque multiplication, mechanical advantage and finer control typically afforded by the lower gear is far better suited for this scenario.   There ARE scenarios where a higher gear MIGHT be appropriate determined more by the drivers ability to control EXCESSIVE wheel spin versus applying torque to the ground.
    • I'm not sure I agree with "extreme" low speed, high torque sentiment here with regards to the prescribed use of low range. How about...whenever it's needed?   A 2.72:1 transfer case and whatever differential gears these Silverados have (3.42's, maybe?) aren't producing "extremely" low crawl speeds. Or insanely high torque multiplication. Even with the 1st gear in these newer transmissions. But it does provide mechanical advantage and potentially better control at slower speeds. And with extra weight or towing, I think it adds mechanical sympathy for the truck as well.   Plus, traction control and the other assists generally turn off when you shift into low range. Those aren't needed here, they'll work against you if you need wheel spin. In high range you'll need to figure out how to turn off the various modes those assists provide. Depending on the vehicle, those things don't all automatically turn off or turn completely off.   While I agree that a farmer might have some great practical experience, a recommendation to "always" using one gear isn't very informed advice. If the farmer had said WHY and could explain the physics behind his prescriptive "always" I'd definitely listen. The way he's described here makes it sounds like he could either be uninformed or is telling everyone what worked for him, not necessarily that there could be a more advantageous way about things.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...