Jump to content

Group Buy: Putco H16/9009 Bulbs

a_guerrajr

By a_guerrajr
in Classifieds (Buy/Sell/Trade)

Recommended Posts

a_guerrajr Enthusiast

a_guerrajr

Posted
Posted

Guys,

 

READ:

Release Date: March 15th 2008

Price: $25.00 + 7.95 S&H(Lower 48 States, have to ask about Canada/Hawaii)

Minimum: 20 Orders to qualify for discount

 

There is free shipping if done as a batch to one location, but this would be complicated, because who ever receives it has to ship them to the other people and then the other people would have to pay the person shipping them aside from the vendor, seems like too much trouble, for now i guess the best thing to do is get as many orders in to have the lowest price possible on the item, i'm aming for 22.00 + 8.00 S&H, that would get us at a total of 30$.

__________________________________________________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]

Subject: Re: Group Buy On H16/9009 Fog Lights

 

Right now it looks like we can take the price down to $25.00 for a group buy with at least 20 orders. We can ship seperately across the states but there will be a shipping charge of $7.95 per order. If we ship a batch to one location, we can ship for free. I will set a discount code for your group to use when ordering and this will take the price down per order. If interested, let me know and I will set the code and provide it to you for immediate use. These bulbs, according to our Putco Rep will not be available until 15 Mar.

 

Thank you for your inquiry.

 

Tim

Wheelz N Grillez Sales

Ph: 1-888-251-8880

__________________________________________________________

Specs:

PUTCO: http://www.putco.com/product/GM_Fog_Lamps_H16/

 

Pics:

WheelzNGrillez: http://www.wheelzngrillez.com/gmfoglibuh1.html

 

Thanks for the other members involved in finding out bulb #'s and date of release.

Colors:

Ion Spark White

Nitro Blue

Jet Yellow

Ignition Purple

 

Applications:

2007-2008 Chevy Tahoe

2007-2008 Chevy Suburban

2007-2008 Chevy Silverado

2007-2008 Chevy Avalanche

 

2007-2008 GMC Sierra

2007-2008 GMC Yukon

2007-2008 GMC Yukon XL

2007-2008 GMC Denali

2007-2008 GMC Acadia

 

2008 Buick Enclave

2007-2008 Pontiac G8

a_guerrajr Enthusiast

a_guerrajr

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Please post what you color you want:

 

Ion Spark White

1. a_guerrajr

2. MHeffe

3. VMax2007

4. gvbhunt

5. 07blackz71

6. saskfarmer

7. akfireman

8. bkr

9. richz

10. eric313

11. SupahZen

12. 2007silveradonbs

 

Jet Yellow

1. Triki_Dick

2. Paul58

3. JNP07CC

 

Nitro Blue

1. Moe Fugga

2. pchrist

3. Rocco715

 

Ignition Purple

 

Total: 18

Triki_Dick Enthusiast

Triki_Dick

Posted
Posted

So, who are we going to call to get the best price.

 

First, we need a number. How many people will buy, I know, it's going to be a pain in the ass getting people to join in, but shall we say, what, 20!?

VMax2007 Senior Enthusiast

VMax2007

Posted
Posted

I placed my order today, prior to finding out they were not available yet. Assuming they cancel my order (I have not heard from them yet), I am in.

 

Ion Spark White.

gvbhunt Enthusiast

gvbhunt

Posted
Posted

Like someone else said, I am not sure how the shipping would work but if it is not a clusterf*&k then sign me up for Ion Spark White Please.

marine_devildog801 Enthusiast

marine_devildog801

Posted
Posted

I WILL be ordering a set, but i am going to wait until i get some new headlights (so i can try to match up colors) which will be sometime this week or maybe. But it'll probably be Ion white or Nitro Blue. Keep the LIST going and i'll get back asap. Good Job guerrajr :banghead:

a_guerrajr Enthusiast

a_guerrajr

Posted
  • Author
Posted
If you post this in the Fullsize Light-Duty Truck section we will get 10X the exposure :banghead:

 

Ehh could maybe not so, because this also goes for the other SUV vechilces, so If they see it here then we can avoid of just informing the fullsize trucks. it'd be awsome if an admin made a sticky informing them there is a group buy going on.

 

I will try to contact either PUTCO or probably the other vendor ( guy sounded pretty cool) and see if this will fly and if they have any requirements.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Aimatdeer
      Ac not keeping up

      By Aimatdeer · Posted

      Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • scotthvac.net
      2022-24 halogen - led grille swap

      By scotthvac.net · Posted

      2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...