Jump to content

‘guzzlers’ Program In Search Of More Funds After Sales Surge


fbachman

Recommended Posts

Posted

The good news: I guess even Washington doesn't overestimate themselves too much anymore. Seems like they never expected it to really work. I guess they were going by past experience......

 

 

queryvar="guzzlers,program,in,search,of,more,funds,after,sales,surge"; Staff and wire reports

Automotive News

July 30, 2009 - 8:52 pm ET

UPDATED: 7/31/2009 1:48 a.m. ET

 

 

WASHINGTON -- The federal "cash for guzzlers" program reached its $1 billion funding limit unexpectedly after an avalanche of business exhausted its funds, an Obama administration official said late Thursday.

 

 

The White House was working with Congress to try to extend funding as lawmakers prepared to leave town for the month of August, according to the official, who was not authorized to speak for attribution.

 

Initially, congressional and industry officials signaled that the program was going to be suspended as soon as today as funding ran out. Those reports, widely reported by national news outlets including Automotive News, triggered confusion throughout the industry.

 

National Automobile Dealers Association spokesman Bailey Wood said earlier Thursday the organization was briefed by Department of Transportation officials on plans to suspend the program at midnight.

 

But later, Chuck Cyrill, another NADA spokesman, said the association had no official DOT confirmation suspending the program.

 

Backlog

 

The plan appeared to be prompted by a NADA survey showing a huge backlog of unplaced dealer orders that would burden the government's computers and exhaust the budgeted funds, he said.

 

NADA plans to issue advice to members at 8 a.m. EDT today. Wood said.

 

U.S. Rep. Fred Upton, (R.-Mich.) said he was told by Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood earlier Thursday that the agency is accepting dealer refund applications only until midnight.

 

"They've exhausted the money," Upton said in an interview.

 

But Upton, quoting LaHood, added, "He did not say any orders placed after midnight would not be honored."

 

Upton said the Michigan congressional delegation spoke by telephone Thursday evening and will be meeting this morning to try to find new funding for the program.

 

"The consensus is that this program has worked and we damn well ought to figure out how to continue it," he said.

 

Transportation spokesman Rae Tyson declined comment.

 

"Incredibly popular"

 

"We are working tonight to assess the situation facing what is obviously an incredibly popular program," a White House official said in an e-mail to Automotive News. "Auto dealers and consumers should have confidence that all valid CARS transactions that have taken place to date will be honored."

 

CARS stands for Car Allowance Rebate System, the official name for the program known popularly as cash-for-clunkers or cash-for-guzzlers.

 

Dealers began offering the U.S.-backed rebates of as much as $4,500 in earnest a week ago. But the Transportation Department will need additional cash after a backlog of nearly 200,000 orders threatened to jam the pipeline

 

The program was part of a congressional effort to revive slumping U.S. sales and further help domestic automakers, especially General Motors Co. and Chrysler Group, which have emerged from brief bankruptcies.

 

Sales spiked more than regulators anticipated this week after the government began logging transactions and approving rebates that indicated consumers were opting for vehicles that get significantly better gasoline mileage than the models they were trading in.

 

Fund sought

 

The administration opted to keep the program in place while it sought new money. It was not clear where the administration would find additional funding in a short period of time.

 

"We hope there's a will and a way to keep the program going a bit longer," GM said in a statement. "Any doubt that the program would jump-start auto sales is completely erased."

 

An estimated 16,000 dealers were eligible for the program and each would have to sell more than a dozen vehicles at the maximum rebate to reach the government's funding limit, according to the NADA.

 

U.S. Senators Dianne Feinstein of California and Susan Collins of Maine said any extension of the incentive must require greater fuel efficiency and higher reductions of auto emissions.

 

Congress wrestled with both issues when it established the current incentive to give U.S. manufacturers a better chance of qualifying for the program.

 

U.S. auto manufacturers are scheduled to report their July sales on Monday.

 

NADA presented the results of a dealer survey to the Transportation Department this week, Wood said.

 

The survey showed that there were almost 200,000 dealer transactions that had not yet been submitted for refunds to the government, he said.

 

Data released earlier Thursday by the government showed that dealers had submitted 22,782 deals seeking $95.9 million in refunds.

 

The NADA survey suggests that if the entire backlog of orders were filed with the government, its $1 billion budget would be depleted, Wood said.

 

Neil Roland, Chrissie Thompson and Reuters contributed to this report.

Posted

I saw this video of what the dealerships are required to do to the cars that come in for that program, and they drain the oil and fill it with sodium silicate, which I understand is like glass going through your engine, I also find it funny how the program ends the day after this video leaked,

 

Do any dealer employees have any experiance with that?

Posted

I'm astounded how fast this all happened, it sure beat the November funds depletion estimate by a few. :thumbs:

 

I wish my 01 Taurus was applicable to this program without MPG restrictions, it would be gone today.

 

:)

Posted
I saw this video of what the dealerships are required to do to the cars that come in for that program, and they drain the oil and fill it with sodium silicate, which I understand is like glass going through your engine, I also find it funny how the program ends the day after this video leaked,

 

Do any dealer employees have any experience with that?

 

Here is a NEWER VOLVO S80...getting the glass treatment.

 

I am really starting to despise this administration. This is completely unacceptable.

 

Some of these cars could be donated to people that really need them...

Posted
I saw this video of what the dealerships are required to do to the cars that come in for that program, and they drain the oil and fill it with sodium silicate, which I understand is like glass going through your engine, I also find it funny how the program ends the day after this video leaked,

 

Do any dealer employees have any experience with that?

 

Here is a NEWER VOLVO S80...getting the glass treatment.

 

I am really starting to despise this administration. This is completely unacceptable.

 

Some of these cars could be donated to people that really need them...

 

 

An S80...now THERE'S a clunker that deserves a lethal injection... :dunno:

 

let's see, $1 billion / $4500 = 222,222 vehicles. The actual number is most likely higher, as not all qualified for the full $4500 clunk-rebate.

 

let's assume that the number of vehicles sold is on the order of 300,000 vehicles. This, I think, has been around, what, 3 weeks now? Let's assume 1 month for posterity.

 

That means sales over the last month, OVER what would have been sold without it, were running at an annual rate of about 3.6 million per year. THAT should show up in the sales numbers next month fer sure.

 

wait till all the dealers start asking: "when do we get our money?" LOL

 

My dealer, one of the best I have found, and a VERY shrewd business man (still healthy despite everything) did NOT participate. His answer was on the order of "I don't look THAT stupid, do I???"

He says when someone comes in, he just gives them the rebate (depending on vehicle), and puts the "clunker" on the used car lot. Of course, this forces him to turn away cars that aren't worth $4500 on his lot. But, he says, that not the market segment I'm targeting anyhow. He says over 80% of his customers trade cars in worth MUCH more than that anyhow. :(

 

This all seems like smoke and mirros to me, but, whaddo I know? :)

Posted
My dealer, one of the best I have found, and a VERY shrewd business man (still healthy despite everything) did NOT participate. His answer was on the order of "I don't look THAT stupid, do I???"

He says when someone comes in, he just gives them the rebate (depending on vehicle), and puts the "clunker" on the used car lot. Of course, this forces him to turn away cars that aren't worth $4500 on his lot. But, he says, that not the market segment I'm targeting anyhow. He says over 80% of his customers trade cars in worth MUCH more than that anyhow. :dunno:

 

This all seems like smoke and mirros to me, but, whaddo I know? :(

 

Good for him. He sounds like a very smart individual.

 

Here's another kicker...

 

C4C is paid for with TAX dollars...so what does the government do when the dealer gets the $4500 from the clunker? Tax it of course.

 

AutoBlog

Posted

This all seems like smoke and mirros to me, but, whaddo I know? :)

 

 

 

:( You nailed it!! This program is 100% BS. After seeing some of the cars being destroyed it just shows how stupid this scam has become. :dunno:

Posted

Like one dealer was quoted in the funny papers comparing C4C to a military operation... "It is a disaster. We met our objective, but the losses were terrible." :dunno:

Posted
This all seems like smoke and mirros to me, but, whaddo I know? :mad:

 

 

:D You nailed it!! This program is 100% BS. . :(

 

 

Just like our present government.... every $%^&* one of em in congress, the senate and the white house.... :idiot:

Posted

Isn't it great having such a bright, experienced individual running our country? :(

 

I had absolutely no idea (or had forgot) that the cars traded in must be destroyed. That's COMPLETELY ridiculous after watching just a few videos on YouTube of many perfectly fine, very new cars being destroyed. It's just wasteful on so many levels and sickening to watch.

Posted
Isn't it great having such a bright, experienced individual running our country? :(

 

I had absolutely no idea (or had forgot) that the cars traded in must be destroyed. That's COMPLETELY ridiculous after watching just a few videos on YouTube of many perfectly fine, very new cars being destroyed. It's just wasteful on so many levels and sickening to watch.

 

na, you just don't UNDERSTAND.... It's helping curb global warming... :idiot::D

Posted
Isn't it great having such a bright, experienced individual running our country? :(

 

I had absolutely no idea (or had forgot) that the cars traded in must be destroyed. That's COMPLETELY ridiculous after watching just a few videos on YouTube of many perfectly fine, very new cars being destroyed. It's just wasteful on so many levels and sickening to watch.

 

na, you just don't UNDERSTAND.... It's helping curb global warming... :idiot::D

 

 

Well I guess it MUST if our leader says so! After all, he has the polar bear death rates to prove it! :mad:

Posted
Isn't it great having such a bright, experienced individual running our country? :(

 

I had absolutely no idea (or had forgot) that the cars traded in must be destroyed. That's COMPLETELY ridiculous after watching just a few videos on YouTube of many perfectly fine, very new cars being destroyed. It's just wasteful on so many levels and sickening to watch.

 

 

Then don't use a perfectly good vehicle for the clunker rebate. I personally like the program and would have rather seen the "stimulus" money from both administrations used for this program instead. It definitely got us looking hard; $4,500 off a new Audi would have been sweet.

 

----------------

Now playing: Alice In Chains - I Can't Remember

via FoxyTunes

Posted
Isn't it great having such a bright, experienced individual running our country? :(

 

I had absolutely no idea (or had forgot) that the cars traded in must be destroyed. That's COMPLETELY ridiculous after watching just a few videos on YouTube of many perfectly fine, very new cars being destroyed. It's just wasteful on so many levels and sickening to watch.

 

 

Then don't use a perfectly good vehicle for the clunker rebate. I personally like the program and would have rather seen the "stimulus" money from both administrations used for this program instead. It definitely got us looking hard; $4,500 off a new Audi would have been sweet.

 

But the problem is most people DID trade in perfectly good vehicles. This program has a very negative effect on the used car network, too. It's not as perfect as the government would have you think.

Posted

I wonder how many roads could be repaved, bridges that could be restored, policeman that could be hired etc. etc. instead of giving people my tax dollars who do not deserve it for them to buy cars they otherwise could not afford. :(

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can someone tell me where the video processing module is in a 2023 Silverado? I'm getting conflicting results that it's in the front passenger area or the rear passenger area behind the seat.
    • Yes I agree, its what amounts to free advertising to let people know about his UOA testing company, and not that there is anything wrong with that but certainly that is a motivator for putting out videos about the science of oil as well as other topics such as oil and air filtration etc. The interesting part I found with his last video is not only the physics behind the reason for the varying wear due to a diesels working torque range causing more bearing load and that higher viscosity oil is of benefit, it was also that the chemistry behind the GM Dexos 0W-20 and the Mobil Dexos licensed 0W-20 are far enough apart that its showing up with a difference in wear even though the two oils are matched in viscosity and in that comparison viscosity was not having the finger pointed at it.    There are a few youtubers out there or one anyway that I have watched a bit of who has gone through the pains of accessing various countries manuals for a certain engine platform and while in the US/Canada it may say use 0W-20 or what have you for some Toyota product, in some other countries it sings a very different tune for the very same engine with the typical traditional oil viscosity/ambient temperature charts to help choose which oil viscosity is correct for the conditions the vehicle will be used in and in some cases its taken an engine in a US manual that states only use 0W-20 as per warranty coverage and yet that same engine in certain other countries may have up to a 15W-40 etc oil option that meets the spec. Another words the guy who is driving through Death Valley or Phoenix and south weather at 120f is often being fed a line of bs by the US system that has forced vehicle companies to restrict the warranty to a specific low viscosity oil for anterior reasons as well as the long drain interval suggestions.    Thankfully youtube is free ( yet anyway ) for viewers to sift through information and of course comes with the good and the bad ( truth and lies ) and we can choose to turn off/not watch what a person finds is bs or just not interested in the topic.         
    • No doubt... But, as someone who doesn't pay for his services, but who has provided a few views/clicks on his Youtube platform, the data around the Mobil oil testing I think does have some value including to "freeloaders" like me.   A lot of what he's doing is likely showing the OE's work in their oil selection, something that many of us had kind of assumed was true all along, a good balance of both excellent protection and efficiency.
    • Lake Speed is drumming up business for his company just by being in the spot-light so he has a vested interest in stoking the 0W-20 fire.  IMO  
    • I knew when I bought my truck that it had off road hill decent or craw control or whatever they call it and rolled my eyes at that but it gets throw on with other options my truck has, I just never had a heads up if the highway speed regular cruise setting had anything to do with the brakes and that took me by surprise. If you've ever been to the top of Pikes Peak and watched those ahead of you on the way down with their brake lights on constantly, one can guess they are probably not gearing down or not enough anyway if their vehicle will allow and a good reason their is a brake check spot part way down where they use an infra red heat gun to check how hot ones brakes are front and rear.    Your right that once one gets out of the front range by Denver and I've not been on that stretch of 285 between Denver and Fairplay myself but I know its high and Fairplay at 10000 feet, Buena Vista at 8000, it drops a bit from there but then your going back up and over the 11000 pass and Durango is at 6500 . So yes your definitely right that 6500 and a lot higher is the theme of going anywhere out in that direction from Denver but hey, the down hill sections give fantastic fuel mileage !.    I don't even look at the fuel pumps for what premium costs here, since I live on a farm and up to this point get fuel delivered I am rarely in front of a fuel pump and when I am, I am often using card lock bulk fuel stations so it tells me what the price is AFTER I buy the fuel. Looking up on gas buddy and converting to US gallons but in Canadian dollars, regular on average of the prices listed was around 5.95 and premium is around 7.00 . That was one reason I did not go for the 6.2 half ton aside from its lack of carrying/towing if one was going by the rule of using premium fuel and until recently one could only buy regular farm gas if playing the few cents off game for farm dyed fuel for a "farm licensed pickup". But yes I hear you on the fuel price difference and like the diesel theme with it often being more expensive then gas it doesn't have quite the charm to it either as it once did although right now here for some reason the price of diesel has come down more so its now inline with the price of regular gas. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...