Jump to content

Sub & Amp Install


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2002 z71 ext. cab...

 

Is there anything I should know/need/watchout for when installing my amp and sub to the factory stereo? Are there any instructions somehwere on how to do this?

Posted

You will need a RCA line convertor that you can buy at bestbuy or any stereo shop. I have this on mine.. Can be tricky adjusting it, because you adjust the gain on the convertor and the gain on the amp.. I have mine set up so its quiet when you have it turned down, but really hits hard once the stereo is turned up. Its really simple to do.

 

James

Posted

There is also the option of adding an amp that takes inputs directly from your speaker wires. This makes installation a little easier than trying to find spots for a couple of LOCs up in the dash.

Posted

On my Tahoe, I installed the "RCA line convertors" between the front and rear doors to the rear speaker connections. Luckily GM made it easy and the speaker wires for the rear doors are twisted on each side. I added 1700 watts total. I wired it this way for this reason. I do not always want to be thumping down the road. Sometimes I enjoy some nice soft jass or soft rock as opposed to Creed or Audio slave jamming at those levels. I can simply turn my fader to the front speakers (Bose system) and have some nice soft music. Or, when the little fart car guys get next to me at a light, I can simply turn my fader more towards the rear and make their braces rattle off their teeth. :flag:

 

As far as instructions, the guys on here have always been completely helpful in assisting people with their installs. There is also a place called "Install Dr"..

 

http://www.installdr.com/QuickWiring.html

 

this place has wiring details for most vehicles.

 

Cheers all...

 

ps: I am not for sure if posting links to other places is cool, so if you pull the link I understand.

Posted
On my Tahoe, I installed the "RCA line convertors" between the front and rear doors to the rear speaker connections. Luckily GM made it easy and the speaker wires for the rear doors are twisted on each side. I added 1700 watts total. I wired it this way for this reason. I do not always want to be thumping down the road. Sometimes I enjoy some nice soft jass or soft rock as opposed to Creed or Audio slave jamming at those levels. I can simply turn my fader to the front speakers (Bose system) and have some nice soft music. Or, when the little fart car guys get next to me at a light, I can simply turn my fader more towards the rear and make their braces rattle off their teeth. :flag:

 

As far as instructions, the guys on here have always been completely helpful in assisting people with their installs. There is also a place called "Install Dr"..

 

http://www.installdr.com/QuickWiring.html

 

this place has wiring details for most vehicles.

 

Cheers all...

 

ps: I am not for sure if posting links to other places is cool, so if you pull the link I understand.

Do you have any pictures of your system? I am trying to gather information on what I want to do with my Yukon.

 

thanks.

Posted

I have a few pics, but not a web page to display a link too. If you send me your email address, I will send a few pics of it. Both of my amps are under the back seats mounted on a 12" x 4ft board. the subs are all independant so I can install my third row seating and leave in a few or move them around without having a huge box to move. I do not have pics of the line converters though. If you pop off the plastic liner between the two doors (The verticle liner) you will see several wires. The speaker wires are twisted around each other, and the only wires there that are twisted.

 

Cheers...

Posted

DO NOT USE Line output converters. All that does is convert a dirty amplified signal into a dirty line voltagae signal. Sounds like crap. Use a PAC adapter.

Posted
DO NOT USE Line output converters. All that does is convert a dirty amplified signal into a dirty line voltagae signal. Sounds like crap. Use a PAC adapter.

:rolleyes: Why not? Mine sounds just fine.

 

Better than fine, actually. It's pretty bada$$, if I do say so myself. :D

 

 

Most people who post here asking about audio installs, aren't looking for a competition level system. If they were, we would probably help them find a forum specifically for that.

 

LOCs are fine for 99.9% of the population. :thumbs:

Posted

I build high end subs, for as much as $6000 for a Home Theater, been doing this for awhile

 

When there is an option available, that is a better one, for the same money, that's what I go for, a no-brainer, no matter what the application. The pac adapter is clean, 4 channel reproduction of the original clean signal, not one or 2, adjustable voltage adjustment. even has a hot remote wire for the amp, provides for future speaker upgrading, is plug and play, requires no cutting or splicing, etc. Oh and it also costs the same or less than 4 channels of LOC. Pretty compelling!

 

If you used a LOC and like it, great, but don't sell the idea of the 2nd best option to 99.9%, just because this is not an audio forum, that's not right. You may not have been aware of the option when you did yours. That is ok, i didn't know about it until it was shown to me. If you were aware of it, I'd say you goofed. But you like yours, don't sweat it. :rolleyes:

Posted

masterp2

Do a search, I don't have the time.

 

Find the time, or quit preaching about how good it is.

 

I did a search, and couldn't find anything.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That's interesting, I assume that would add to the cost of the oil but also I was forgetting to bring up the issue of the low tension rings allowing more oil past which in turn forces the cats to have more oil additives pass through them that wouldn't otherwise so they are creating that problem and of course its all in the name of fuel economy. Mind you the other issue would be the lack of additives that fight the formation of carbon within the piston ring grooves which turn the engine into an oil burner and with in this GM forums case is your average off the shelf Dexos licensed oil, meanwhile the other off the shelf oil being Valvoline's R&P isn't licensed and the only one that is which is that certain Mobil oil that came out recently ( its not even being marketed in Canada ) and only a fraction of vehicle owners are going to be using it out of all the other oils on the shelf or the quickie lube bay that meet the Dexos spec by way of actual licensing.    Also I suspect that its an easy excuse to pool the non turbo DI engines in with the turbo DI engines and design the oil to not have LSPI issues in the most demanding engines and short change the naturally aspirated DI by not offering a higher concentration of additive package they could handle and still not be at risk of LSPI.    I wonder if Amsoil flipped the switch just lately and did whatever packaging designation at the same time as I wonder what oil formulation I would have bought in May, of course I don't know when it was packaged at the factory vs how long it was in storage at the Edmonton warehouse. I know its been said at least in the past that the big players switch over to a reformulated oil but the packaging has not changed until they make that move as well so there is that cross over time where its a new formulation in a predated formula marked package. 
    • Hmm. A real reason to not just use the odometer to determine OCI?    
    • Sad thing is that this doesn't have to be the case. LSPI can be solved without a reduction in TBN. Swap Ca for Mg.  Cats are not a issue if the OEM can get a ring and valve guide seal even at SN levels of SAPS. Dizzy is purring like a kitten with a bowl of warm milk. 200K of Full SAPS oil and zero detonation issues and nice a clean inside and out. This shouldn't be an issue. It isn't 1920.    Tell ya what AMSOIL SS is excellent at, internal cleanliness. The new formula is even a step up from their already outstanding cleanliness levels. Can't say the OEM offering is quite that clean. There marketing suggest the SS is cleaner.     That is the only defense with at shelf oil. Nothing wrong with them if you ignore the marketing and OEM 'recommended' OCI and use a thimble full of common sense. 😉 You go sir. 
    • I started with a folding cover by BAK PAC on my 2500. It went bad after close to 5 years. Bent and vinyl coming loose. Contacted BAK and they gave me a very good discount on a Revolver. Had it a number of years. Mostly outdoor storage. Some garage storage. Vinyl started to come loose. Still under warranty so they replaced to cover. Sold the 2500, bought the 1500 and got another revolver for it. Had it a couple years now and no issues. I store it indoors. Got a bit of discount when buying it as well. If you are seeing problems, contact BAK or real truck and let them know. Customer service was pretty good. But I think they changed their warranty.
    • I agree, there is no one answer fits all as every rig is different, one may be pulling some little aluminum fishing boat while another is towing a monstrosity that weighs a lot and hopefully the owner if the rig has some prior experience to know what drive mode they should choose.    It also struck me and this is from watching a few of those boat ramp escapades videos in the past, Ford being one of the vehicles that has the auto front axle hubs and sure enough its found out that one hub has crapped out and won't engage and may not have manual hubs to even select on both sides so they are on the boat ramp stuck with no four wheel drive and spinning .... they flat out need a tow to get up the ramp and deal with the vehicles new found issues. That can happen to all brands of pickup, finding out either four wheel drive or 4 low isn't working right at the time its needed it to work as some electronic crap has failed. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...