Jump to content

best 1/2 ton engine among chevy, ford, dodge?

wildcats

Recommended Posts

wildcats Enthusiast

wildcats

Posted
Posted

Ok, what is the best engine - GM 5.3, Ford 5.4, or Dodge 4.7 or 5.9?  I personally like Ford's 5.4 as it produces the most torque and is soon going to be updated to more than 300 HP and 380 ft. lbs.  What are your opinions?

Roofer Senior Enthusiast

Roofer

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't say any one of them is superior, but with a GM you can get better options. Things such as tow/haul mode is better than just on/off OD, 4.10 gears, and auto 4WD function.  Besides that, the 5.3 is faster and revs higher alot faster. The 5.3 is made to be driven hard. It's an LS1 for cripes sake! hehe  :thumbs:

HillHound Senior Enthusiast

HillHound

Posted
Posted
You sad, sad individuals.  The Ford engine might have more torque, But its madly underpowered. 5.3 is defiantly better.

Yeah what he said.  I've driven a few Fords with the 5.4L and I can tell you they sure doesn't have the throttle response and mid and high rpm acceleration that the 5.3L offers, despite the differences on paper in torque.  If you don't believe it go drive both for yourself.

 

Check out these Truck Trend tests from last year:

Silverado & Tundra Specs...

F150 & Ram 1500 Specs...

 

Some folks like to say the 5.4L outperforms the 5.3L under load, but as you can see the GM 5.3L outaccelerated all the other 1/2 ton pickups 0-60 and 1/4 mile unloaded and with a 1000lb load in the bed.  According to this test, the Toyota Tundra 4.7L outperforms the 5.4L empty and loaded :thumbs: !!

 

Here's another engine test comparison as if the first isn't enough:

Edmunds Fullsize Shootout

 

As far as Ford updating their engines, I hope they do.  Dodge is introducing their "Hemi" 5.7L and I hardly doubt GM will sit by and let themselves play catch-up for long.  I expect GM could introduce the 6.0L in the 1500s without much trouble (look at the GMC Sierra Denali) and I've heard rumors the 5.3L can be easily tuned/tweaked to produce over 300hp along with a small increase in torque.

CanadianZ71 Enthusiast

CanadianZ71

Posted
Posted

In my humble opinion Chevy's 5.7 is/was the best 1/2 ton motor.  I don't know about performance numbers but I can say one thing - these motors last.  I can honestly say after looking for a full year for a used truck that I never seen any dodge or ford trucks with high, high miles that still had life in them.  Even on these boards, guys have chevs with more miles on the engine than you would seen on any Fords and Dodges.  To me the best motor is the one that lasts and chevs got that hands down.

Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

My parents have a 5.4 in a Supercrew: absolurely gutless, non responsive, and just overall luggish. All followed up by bad shift points in the tranny. Id go with a 5.3 for overall quality and power. And believe it or not the tow/ haul feature is a plus; keeps you in the power. As for the 5.9... Good engine as well. Notice how long its been around? And, watch out for their new 5.7 Hemi!! Im afraid its gonna be a romper stomper!! GM and ford better get ready!

SilveradoWV Senior Enthusiast

SilveradoWV

Posted
Posted
gm 4.8

I agree!!!!!!!! Why? Because its in my truck!!!

 

Actually I would have to pick the 5.3, it will spin em any time you want it to!!! Also the 5.7 350 GM engine is/was a good engine, but the new engines just have more top end and horses, although the 350s are torque monstars!!!

wildcats Enthusiast

wildcats

Posted
  • Author
Posted

If Ford's 5.4 is such a poor engine, how has it made Ward's 10 Best Engines list ever since it was introduced?  It's made the list for 6 consecutive years.

obyone Enthusiast

obyone

Posted
Posted
Hey Hillhound, did u happen to notice which truck won the Edmunds Full-size shootout?

Got a link to that?

 

Edmund's....that some kind of Nazi site? :thumbs:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Atlas · Posted

      On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • chris21
      Brand new to this forum. Questions about re-gearing my 26’ HD

      By chris21 · Posted

      I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • asilverblazer
      OCI, not when but why?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • BDS my HD
      Brand new to this forum. Questions about re-gearing my 26’ HD

      By BDS my HD · Posted

      Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • newdude
      Brand new to this forum. Questions about re-gearing my 26’ HD

      By newdude · Posted

      That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...