Jump to content

Installing 6x9 Speakers...


Recommended Posts

Posted

Howdy all. Newbie here. Just purchased an 01 Sierra SLT extended cab on Saturday and a few of the speakers are blown. I was wondering if it's possible, and if anyone has installed 6x9's, and if so what problems may have been encountered while doing so. I did this once in a 2000 ranger, but want to make sure it's doable before getting into it. Thanks all.

 

Josh

Posted

It should be possible, but you'll need to do some creative trimming to the current mounting locations to get them to fit. You may also need to be careful of depth.

Posted

I would think you should be able to fit them under the arm rests in the rear doors. I replaced my stock 4x6's with 2 way Infinity's and even that made a huge change. I've been toying with mounting a sub in the one side as it's huge in there and mine is only a 3 door though I'm not sure of 2 things.

A) if there is enough room in there and

B) whether or not I want to stare at a sub when I open the other side door.

 

I've always liked subs that are hidden and there just isn't a lot of room for those in these trucks. (( I prefer the under rear seat storage))

 

Anyways see pics of mine attached.

 

 

-Evan

post-16892-1253643285_thumb.jpg

post-16892-1253643291_thumb.jpg

post-16892-1253643285_thumb.jpg

post-16892-1253643291_thumb.jpg

post-16892-1253643285_thumb.jpg

post-16892-1253643291_thumb.jpg

post-16892-1253643285_thumb.jpg

post-16892-1253643291_thumb.jpg

Posted

Yeah....depth is a concern...especially in the front doors seeing as I'd like the windows to still function properly. It looks like there is enough room through that screen in the door as far as size goes but yeah...the depth. Major concern. Maybe I'll leave the 6's up front and put the 6x9's in back...hrm...

Posted
Yeah....depth is a concern...especially in the front doors seeing as I'd like the windows to still function properly. It looks like there is enough room through that screen in the door as far as size goes but yeah...the depth. Major concern. Maybe I'll leave the 6's up front and put the 6x9's in back...hrm...

 

 

Definitly leave the door speakers as 6 1/2s... If you want to upgrade in the doors do a component set. I prefer Infinty perfects but they are pricey, but will sound better then any 6x9 you can find. And pretty much any stereo manufacture make a shallow mounting depth speaker. JBL an Polk i know do off the top of my head. And you can fit 6x9s in the extended cab speaker holes with some trimming obviously i have seen it done. Good Luck

Posted

Nother option would be to do a matching 6 1/2 component set out back... thats what i have and it sounds fantastic and i have had about ten different setups in the past. here are some shallow mount speakers... first thing i found on crutchfield there are many more but just to give you an idea of whats out thre

http://www.crutchfield.com/app/product/sea...%5dCar+Speakers

Hope this helps... o yeah and chuck16 they also make shallow mount subs that would probably work in your door though ive never seen it done...

http://www.crutchfield.com/app/product/sea...dCar+Subwoofers

Posted

In my 2000 Z71, I've got 6 1/2" (front) and 4"x6" (rear) Infinity's with a 10" sub under the rear seat, and I can't imagine needing or wanting anything else. I think the stock size with a quality speaker is too easy, and sounds awesome to think about chopping into my truck. :lol:

Posted

Well, after much debate I decided to just stick with the OEM sizes. It all started by me finding a pair of infinity reference component systems on ebay for 62.50 each. My father in law has a 2k silverado and has been whining about how his entire stereo is shot for over a year, so I figured one set for me, one for him. I then found a set of infinity reference 4x6's and got two of them. He is gonna buy the decks. I have two 12's in a car box from years ago and a dead amp....I'm thinking one sub and an amp and I'll be golden....well, plus a box too. :P Thanks for all the help all. Now I've just gotta figure out how I'm gonna hook up my OBA and the air horns. :D

  • 4 years later...
Posted

Has anyone actually put 6x9s in their extended cab yet? I've been thinking about doing it with some Kenwoods but wanted to see if anyone had success yet.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Howdy all. Newbie here. Just purchased an 01 Sierra SLT extended cab on Saturday and a few of the speakers are blown. I was wondering if it's possible, and if anyone has installed 6x9's, and if so what problems may have been encountered while doing so. I did this once in a 2000 ranger, but want to make sure it's doable before getting into it. Thanks all.

 

Josh

 

I just installed some 6x9s in the rear of my 06 silverado above the cup holder. It was a pretty tight fit but I made it work.

  • 1 year later...
Posted

[quote name="06Chevy1500" post="1418872" timestamp="1393272741"

 

Do you have any pics of this. I am thinking about doing the same thing.

 

 

I just installed some 6x9s in the rear of my 06 silverado above the cup holder. It was a pretty tight fit but I made it work.

Posted

In my 2000 Z71, I've got 6 1/2" (front) and 4"x6" (rear) Infinity's with a 10" sub under the rear seat, and I can't imagine needing or wanting anything else. I think the stock size with a quality speaker is too easy, and sounds awesome to think about chopping into my truck. :dunno:

Did the exact same thing in my '03.

 

I'm still rockin' my old Clarion Pro Audio DXZ655MP head unit...

But I added:

6 1/2" Kicker Components in the front http://www.crutchfield.com/p_20641S654/Kicker-41KSS654.html?tp=106

4x6 Kicker in the rear http://www.crutchfield.com/p_20641KS464/Kicker-41KSC464.html?tp=100

10" Kicker sub http://www.crutchfield.com/p_2064CWR102/Kicker-40CWR102.html?tp=111 in a custom box under the rear seat

300W Kicker Amp http://www.crutchfield.com/p_2062CX3001/Kicker-12CX300-1.html?tp=35834

 

It makes noise... :thumbs:

Posted

I would imagine a sub in the rear door would rattle...

A lot.

... and it would have to be a "free air" sub or setup as an infinite baffle

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 540 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...