Jump to content

93 Octane. Where?


wurgs

Recommended Posts

Posted

I an looking to get a 93 octane tune for my truck but can't seem to find 93 octane fuel in the Fargo, ND area. I could go with a 87 octane tune but what fun would that be? Thanks for any help.

Posted

you guys have Chevron down there??

 

That's what I use, they have 94 octane as they're supreme+ grade.

 

If not, the 92 octane fuel is generally around 93+... If you read the label it says 92 minimum octane rating...you'd be fine using that...and if your still a little skeptical, toss a can of booster in it.

Posted

no chevron. Mostly Tesoro and cenex maybe a couple mobils and the usual mom and pop gas stations. Not much of a selection out on the prairie.

Posted

fuel up with the highest octane you can find, then go buy a pack of octane booster (AMSOIL is good).They are about $9.65 a container but i think you can get a big box for a discount.

Every time you fill up, dump a container in there.

 

AMSOIL says it will get you about 3 extra points from a full 12-ounce bottle. Use it in everything from sleds to race cars.

 

AND you get awesome stickers! to prove how much of a BA you are because you use octane booster...

Posted

I have no problem finding 93 octane here. 9 out ot 10 gas stations has 93

Posted

93 octane is fairly common around Indianapolis. I just filled up with 93 today at a Meijer gas station. There is a local station about a mile from my house in Clermont that sells 110 octane if you'd like to go that route. :cool:

Posted

Over a year ago I switched from regular gas to 91+ octane gas. I keep meticulous records of my MPGs with every tank of gas ever since I've had the truck. When I switched, my records show a consistant 1-1.5 mpg increase. I haven't noticed any performance gains, but there is definately some economy gains for me.

Posted
Over a year ago I switched from regular gas to 91+ octane gas. I keep meticulous records of my MPGs with every tank of gas ever since I've had the truck. When I switched, my records show a consistant 1-1.5 mpg increase. I haven't noticed any performance gains, but there is definately some economy gains for me.

If what you say is true, then in this scenario you would get 35 more miles out of a tank......If you gained 1.5 mpg.

 

Truck A

420 miles

34 gals

12.35 mpg

 

Truck B

470 miles

34 gals

13.85 mpg

 

with the monetary difference on what truck A spent and truck B spent to fill up, truck A could have only traveled 15 additional miles. That would bring truck A's total range to 435 miles, still 35 miles short of what truck B could travel on its initial 34 gallons of fuel.

 

Interesting fact there GMC_MAXX, thanks for sharing!

Posted
Over a year ago I switched from regular gas to 91+ octane gas. I keep meticulous records of my MPGs with every tank of gas ever since I've had the truck. When I switched, my records show a consistant 1-1.5 mpg increase. I haven't noticed any performance gains, but there is definately some economy gains for me.

If what you say is true, then in this scenario you would get 35 more miles out of a tank......If you gained 1.5 mpg.

 

Truck A

420 miles

34 gals

12.35 mpg

 

Truck B

470 miles

34 gals

13.85 mpg

 

with the monetary difference on what truck A spent and truck B spent to fill up, truck A could have only traveled 15 additional miles. That would bring truck A's total range to 435 miles, still 35 miles short of what truck B could travel on its initial 34 gallons of fuel.

 

Interesting fact there GMC_MAXX, thanks for sharing!

 

 

LOL...it is worth it. My 6 litre will get 80 more clicks out of a tank. The reason for it with a tune is so you can advance the timing. It does make a difference, and it throw pings at you and drop your timing automatically...I ran a few tanks with the 87 tune then went to 93 re-flashed my ECM and it makes a difference. Snappier throttle.....anyways here in Canada it's everywhere. Except husky stations. Shells got it, Mohawk, petro-can.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 288 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...