Jump to content

My New Silverado Needs Help


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2010 ex cab 5.3 z71 and I am VERY unhappy with the performance I CAN'T EVEN BURN THE TIRES EVEN IF I STAND ON THE BRAKES AND THE GAS. I know it's not made for burnouts but I towed a boat last weekend and it was terrible 65 up mild hills STANDING on it and it wouldn't gain speed. I was on it the whole time I felt like I was driving a six cylinder. I just hit 13000 miles so it's broken in. I thought it was sluggish new a couple months ago and everyone said wait till it's broke in but now it is and still. Would it help to put higher octane gas in it ???? Anyone know who makes performance stuff for the 2010 xfe model yet. All I have found is banks exhaust. Anybody have this issue?? It also chatters for a couple seconds when it starts cold?? I know on my tundra the techs said it was made for 87 and would run worse with high octane is this the case with the silverado. I know I was a little spoiled with my 07 tundra with the 5.7 but this is rough

Posted

13K miles on a 2010? Damn I thought my 6700 was alot.

Posted

If it's a 4x4, the reason you can't do a burnout is the selector is prob set at automatic and it's in 4 wheel drive since it thinks you need more traction. Also make sure traction control is turned off. 4x4 or 4x2.

 

And yes, pulling a boat up hill with a headwind = your truck slowing down at hwy speeds. There is a ton of wind resistance and weight you have to overcome when towing

Posted

I agree with no power when stopped. The 5.3 has all kinds of power but gm@has programmed them to be gutless. My 06 was not as bad, but would not brake torque well. Sometimes you just want to bake the tires. When I mash the pedal from a stop, I have hesitation. Nothing like pulling into traffic a half second slower than you expected.

Posted
I agree with no power when stopped. The 5.3 has all kinds of power but gm@has programmed them to be gutless. My 06 was not as bad, but would not brake torque well. Sometimes you just want to bake the tires. When I mash the pedal from a stop, I have hesitation. Nothing like pulling into traffic a half second slower than you expected.

 

If you think the 5.3l is gutless on a stock tune, you need to drive a stock VMax 6.0l it is worse than the 5.3l.

Posted

I dont know about that, my 06 vmax was a rocket. Completly out of the box I raced a trans am with a 6.6l and I was on his bumper to 100 mph.

 

What gearing did it come with? that makes a lot of diff.

Posted
I dont know about that, my 06 vmax was a rocket. Completly out of the box I raced a trans am with a 6.6l and I was on his bumper to 100 mph.

 

What gearing did it come with? that makes a lot of diff.

 

 

The 2006 trucks have pretty good stock tunes, not the 2007-2009 Vortec Max trucks. On a stock tune, my V-Max has a 4 second delay in power when trying to go WOT, a lot of Torque Management, speed limiter set at 92mph, when flooring the truck the truck doesn't respond instantly. Now with an aftermarket tune, it is a completely different truck.

Posted

Can you elaborate a little on what and where the tune helped you the most? I have a 6.0 Vmax 4x4 on 35" tires and i need power badly!! Im having Justin do an in person tune next month sometime but im just curious where you noticed most of your difference at. Also what gas did you elect to run?

Thank you!!

 

I dont know about that, my 06 vmax was a rocket. Completly out of the box I raced a trans am with a 6.6l and I was on his bumper to 100 mph.

 

What gearing did it come with? that makes a lot of diff.

 

 

The 2006 trucks have pretty good stock tunes, not the 2007-2009 Vortec Max trucks. On a stock tune, my V-Max has a 4 second delay in power when trying to go WOT, a lot of Torque Management, speed limiter set at 92mph, when flooring the truck the truck doesn't respond instantly. Now with an aftermarket tune, it is a completely different truck.

 

Posted
your probably have 3.42..gears..i have no problem smoken my tires..or pulling stuff up hills.

 

 

I think he has the XFE model, which comes with the 5.3l with 3.08 gears mated to the 6 speed automatic.

Posted
Can you elaborate a little on what and where the tune helped you the most? I have a 6.0 Vmax 4x4 on 35" tires and i need power badly!! Im having Justin do an in person tune next month sometime but im just curious where you noticed most of your difference at. Also what gas did you elect to run?

Thank you!!

 

I dont know about that, my 06 vmax was a rocket. Completly out of the box I raced a trans am with a 6.6l and I was on his bumper to 100 mph.

 

What gearing did it come with? that makes a lot of diff.

 

 

The 2006 trucks have pretty good stock tunes, not the 2007-2009 Vortec Max trucks. On a stock tune, my V-Max has a 4 second delay in power when trying to go WOT, a lot of Torque Management, speed limiter set at 92mph, when flooring the truck the truck doesn't respond instantly. Now with an aftermarket tune, it is a completely different truck.

 

 

 

 

On my first tune which I got back in 2008, I went with a 91 octane performance tune. It was a completely different truck, I removed the 4 second delay, removed 80 percent torque management, turned off AFM, changed transmission shifts points, removed speed limiter. After the tune, the truck was great. I could use all my power, the truck responded instantly when accelerating. When merging to another lane I would accelerate and the truck would get going with no problem. No more lag in power, got it up to 130mph. The transmission shifts way better, with the AFM turned off I would get better mileage with normal driving. Right now, I'm on stock tune. The stock tune is worse than I remember. Need to get my Black Bear Tune back, you will love the way your truck drives after it is tuned. Best mod that I have done so far.

Posted

I put 4.56 gears in my 08 5.3 and it would smoke the Nitto 35's.

 

I have a stock set of 3.73 out of that 08 in the garage that would wake up the 2010 5.3.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,137 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The oil filter has NOTHING To do with oil leak. GM sources parts from 1,000's of vendors and as with anything mass produced, flaws are unavoidable.    Putting a larger oil filter will do nothing but satisfy emotions. The OEM filter is designed for the engine and perfectly capable of handling the demands on the engine. Oversize oil filter could result in reduced flow and overall lower oil pressure.
    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...