Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
009.JPG

 

It's just like the one mc7719 (topic starter) has build in (the top one). Only the partnumber is different.

Yes, the friendly lady is listing the options that I had before I've changed the VCIM. So, it's not communicating properly with the VCIM.

I'm afraid I've waisted 200+ dollars on a aluminum box.... :dunno:

Yeah, that looks right, I got nothing, sorry...

Posted

I have been mailing with the seller on Ebay and he suggests I'll find someone with GM Tech II software and a OBD2 interface to reprogram the system to have my VCIM working. Now an OBD2 interface cable is not an issue, but the software is. Perhaps someone knows where to download it?

Thanks in advance.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I have an 07 Yukon slt. I am pulling my hair out trying to vcim swap for Bluetooth. I first bought part number 20842731. After plugging it in I had a green light but I could not connect to on star or Bluetooth. I pressed the talk button as well as on star button on mirror but didn't get anything. After thinking I had the wrong part number I bought 25984444 and installed it. Same thing happened. can someone help me please?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
I have an 07 Yukon slt. I am pulling my hair out trying to vcim swap for Bluetooth. I first bought part number 20842731. After plugging it in I had a green light but I could not connect to on star or Bluetooth. I pressed the talk button as well as on star button on mirror but didn't get anything. After thinking I had the wrong part number I bought 25984444 and installed it. Same thing happened. can someone help me please?

 

Hi just did a swap my 2008 gmc seirra slt hd and works awesome i used GM part# 20829984 for the vcim and Gm part# 15938939 for the bluetooth antenna i have the red light so onstar wont work i havnet tryed to get that working since i don't care about it but maybe those item numbers will work for you. Both items are from a 2010 gmc denali.

Posted

Hmm, I have bought the same VCIM, but it's no plug and play for me. I still haven't found an engineer who is capable of programming this for me. Here in Holland, these cars are not that common.

But I'm glad you have it working. And that I know that the VCIM is a good on :thumbs:

Posted (edited)

Thanks. That really sucks you would think its not that difficult to program hopefully you can get it to work. I thought the only reason for programing was to get full function of the on star.

Edited by mx_master
Posted

Hey MC7719,

First time on this/any other forum.

I'm in Calgary and am having a hard time finding a VCIM for my truck.

I have all the pre-req's just can't find the module w/ Bluetooth. Any help would be great.

I understand the following will work.

25984444, 20783877, 20829984, 20756237, 20827036

 

Thanks!

Posted
Hmm, I have bought the same VCIM, but it's no plug and play for me. I still haven't found an engineer who is capable of programming this for me. Here in Holland, these cars are not that common.

But I'm glad you have it working. And that I know that the VCIM is a good on :)

 

 

What year is your truck? In your profile it shows a 2007 truck, could you maybe not have a GMT900?

Posted
What year is your truck? In your profile it shows a 2007 truck, could you maybe not have a GMT900?

 

A 2007 truck. What do you mean with GMT900 and how can I check this?

Posted
What year is your truck? In your profile it shows a 2007 truck, could you maybe not have a GMT900?

 

A 2007 truck. What do you mean with GMT900 and how can I check this?

 

 

 

In 2007 they had two different versions of Sierra/Silverado. They sold one as being the Classic model, and the other as just Sierra or Silverado. I doubt the Classic model will support bluetooth due to version of the "GMlan CANbus"(not sure on the correct term, but it means the level of the software/hardware in they truck) in the truck. I am sure someone with more knowledge of the proper terms will chime in.

Posted
In 2007 they had two different versions of Sierra/Silverado. They sold one as being the Classic model, and the other as just Sierra or Silverado. I doubt the Classic model will support bluetooth due to version of the "GMlan CANbus"(not sure on the correct term, but it means the level of the software/hardware in they truck) in the truck. I am sure someone with more knowledge of the proper terms will chime in.

Oh, that difference... Well, my Sierra is not the Classic one; the Denali version is only available as of 2007. And it's equipped with the proper version of CANbus.

Posted

I just wanted to say thank you for all the posts and recommendations in this thread!! After a lot of research I ordered 20787107 w/bluetooth chip already installed off E-Bay for under $200. I was a little worried because it was listed as "removed out of an 08-10 SAAB" but the cross references matched to other trucks and other E-bay sales. So, I took a chance and it WORKS! The OnStar light is now out (not red) and when I push the blue button it says the account is inactive. I don't plan on using OnStar anyway but I figured I will give it a whirl tomorrow. The truck is being dropped at the dealer so they can install the backup camera I had them toss in with the deal so if there is any programming to be done it will all be done at the same time.

 

Anyway, tickled pink that bluetooth works! Thank you, thank you, thank you!!

 

-Trip

2008 GMC Sierra SLT

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I'd also like to pass my thanks along to all of those who added their information on swapping out the VCIM.

Special thanks to mc7719 for your pics, info, etc.

After a lenghty search, with the help of www.car-part.com I found 20783877 at a recycler in Cumberland BC for $150.

It didn't have the antenna, dealer wanted $94, so I went back online and found a guy in Kalimazoo who had purchased a bunch of modules when GM stopped production of the Hummer. Got it shipped to the door for $38.

 

 

There's a guy in Calgary with one, if any one is looking, search kijiji its.... VCIM 20829984

 

And here's the contact info for the guy in kalamazoo. He's asking $250 w/ the antenna on brand new units.

 

Clay VanderMeeden"S1AutoParts" on eBay

 

Source One Services

 

3180 Kersten Court

 

Kalamazoo, MI 49048

 

269-343-3323

 

1-855-766-3288

 

 

 

Once again thanks everyone.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,479 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...