Jump to content

Serpentine Belt


jhm

Recommended Posts

Posted

I checked my manual for scheduled maintenance. Nowhere does it say to replace the belt. I can't think of any other make that dosent reccomend replacing after approx 80-100k. Must be a reason???

Posted

I certainly does need to be replaced and I would suggest around 70,000 miles or 7 years, whatever comes first. Yes there are people who get 100,000+ miles on the original belt, but common sense says you don't wait that long, just like you don't wait 100,000 miles before changing the plugs. Replacing the serp belt is one of the easiest repairs you can do on your truck, go get a good quality Gates or Goodyear belt from NAPA or Autozone, and have at it! $30.00 is about all you will have to spend.

Posted
I certainly does need to be replaced and I would suggest around 70,000 miles or 7 years, whatever comes first. Yes there are people who get 100,000+ miles on the original belt, but common sense says you don't wait that long, just like you don't wait 100,000 miles before changing the plugs. Replacing the serp belt is one of the easiest repairs you can do on your truck, go get a good quality Gates or Goodyear belt from NAPA or Autozone, and have at it! $30.00 is about all you will have to spend.

i dont care about price or simplicity. WHY does the owners manual not adress it?

Posted

 

That thread is a joke IMO. Be careful what you read on the internet.

 

Belt on the silverado takes 10 minutes to replace.

 

The thread is a joke? That GM Tech was the best this site ever had. How long have you been an ASE Certified tech? I think you shoul be careful what you SAY on the internet. :thumbs:

 

 

I was an ASE Certified tech for 7 years and am now an Aerospace Engineer. I just don't go around and tout my credentials.

 

Ill state my opinion as I feel.

 

Good luck running your "lifetime" belt. :cool:

 

IMO = In MY Opinion. You're welcome to take it or leave it... but that's what these forums are for. I don't know of any belt manufacturer that would recommend not inspecting/replacing the serp belt... its not a lifelong product and its failure will leave you on the side of the road. Almost every vehicle service schedule that I have used during my time as an ASE Tech included "check belts and hoses" on a relatively frequent basis.... sometimes 15, 20 or 30k intervals.

Posted

In my 08 GMC owners manual, chapter 6 page 8. Additional Required Services. At the bottom.

 

Inspect engine accessory drive belt

An Emission Control Service

See footnote (q)

 

(q) Visually inspect belt for fraying, excessive cracks, or

obvious damadge. Replace belt if necessary.

 

Mark

Posted
i dont care about price or simplicity. WHY does the owners manual not adress it?

Probably because GM doesn't want it's customers doing any work to their own vehicles. It's painfully obvious with some of the designs of systems these things ... like how you change headlight bulbs, and that single stupid torsion spring on the drum brakes ... but I digress ....

 

I think they want the belt to shred, & then leave your wife on the side of the highway at rush hour ... so you'll second guess your abilities & come running to the dealer with $300 for a belt swap. :uhoh:

Posted

As i said in post #4 and like markw8 posted, i'm fairly certain it's an "inspect and replace" item.

 

It's just like tires, brakes and hoses... those arent listed as "to be replaced at _____ miles". Does that mean they don't need to be replaced? No. They're items that are meant to be inspected on a consistent basis and replaced as necessary.

 

GM probably felt it was a waste to specify a mileage to replace the belt, especially since belt wear isn't as much of a function of mileage as it is about engine revolutions. So instead of telling us to replace it at XX,XXX miles, they say to replace it when necessary. It's not rocket science (no pun intended :uhoh:)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...