Jump to content

20's To 17's


SJP12

Recommended Posts

Posted

When I got my truck new in 08 it had the 20's tires ( 255/70/R20 ??? ) Its getting time to replace the tires and I would like to go to a 17" tire/wheel combo....I like old school looks. How much differance is there between the Stock 20" tire/wheel combo vs the 275/70/R17, by differance I'm talking ride, height over look? Will my speedo be off and how much will I loose in gas mileage? The truck has a RC 2" level. Truck is a 2wd 5.3 08.

 

 

I'm looking at Nitto, Toyo or other similar AT tire.

 

Thanks!

Posted

Stock tires are 275/55/20 and 275/70/17 are the exact same size tire. Ride will change alittle depending on tires, gas mileage will depend on tire weight. I would think gas mileage would stay the same since a/t are heavier but you are getting lighter wheel. No change in speedo either.

 

So the only difference is the wheels will look smaller and you will have more sidewall.

Posted

as long as the outside diameter is the same the speedo and mpg won't change.

 

the 20s are 275/55 R20 so a 265/70 R17 would have the same outside diameter (over all tire diameter is the same) but you will have more sidewall so the ride might feel less "stiff", cornering will be softer as the tire will give more, and you might improve MPG slightly as rubber weighes less than metal and you are adding more tire and reducing the overall weight of the wheel.

 

 

if you go wider, say 285, then reduce the side % and go 65, so 285/65R17 also carries the same outer diameter size (it is actually 0.3 inches less) but won't make any major difference.

 

 

 

remember the first number is the tire width in millimeters, 285mm, the second number is the % of the width, i.e. 65% of 285 (185.25mm) so a 285/65 is 35% wider than it is tall..

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...