Jump to content

a few pics from photography class


Recommended Posts

Posted

I conned a classmate to scan a few of my slides in the final weeks of photography class and I thought I'd share a few of the pictures with you guys.

 

This one I took on September 11th in Downtown Milwaukee, I thought it was a pretty dramatic shot w/ the flags waving on the bridge:

september11_flags.jpg

 

Okay, i lied, here's a truck, too bad it's just a R.C.

h2.jpg

 

This is my girlfriend's son outside her house:

jayden_pointing.jpg

 

Yours truly playing a lil' baseball, gotta love that self-timer:

me_hitting_baseball.jpg

 

A few lighthouses on Lake Michigan:

lighthouse.jpg

 

Reflection on my car:

reflection_in_gtp.jpg

 

A long exposure (about 15 seconds) of cars driving by just after sunset:

pilgrim_road_at_night.jpg

 

Downtown Milwaukee, that's the new art museum on the right and the US Bank building on the left (40 stories, tallest building in the state, which is nothing compared to most states):

milwaukee_skyline.jpg

 

And me again in the studio at school:

me_in_studio.jpg

 

I hope you guys enjoyed the pics, just thought I'd share them with you.  My personal favorite is the picture I took downtown of the flags on the bridge.  That was the main one I wanted scanned, but I figured might as well get a few more done right away.

 

These were all taken w/ a cannon rebel 35mm camera on Kodak Ekatachrome 200 speed slide film.  The scans were all done between 500 dpi and 2,000 dpi on some of them so I had 20 pics scanned and they took up three cd's worth of space :jester: I was personally amazed at the quality.  I'm almost thinking about getting a slide scanner and doing more shots that way until I can afford a really really good digital camera.  The image quality is incredible, I wish I could show you one of the 50 meg original files to show you.

 

This is my first photography class that I have taken, but I've always enjoyed taking pictures.  This way I get to learn how a camera works and some better techniques.  By the end of the class I have been able to manipulate the photo when I take the picture instead of relying on photoshop like I do when I take most digital shots.

 

Anyways, let me know what you think, any constructive criticism?

Posted
Hey, they look good Jon!! :thumb:

Thanks...

 

 

Shhh, don't tell her, but I'm getting the picture of her son standing in the court pointing printed as a poster (13"x19.4") for part of her x-mas present.  Now I better go and buy a frame.

Posted
Good pics!

 

Wow, I didn't know your G\F had a son.

 

I have a cousin that's about his age. (guessing from the pics, I'd sayhe's either 2 or 3, am I correct?).

Yeah, he's two and a half.

Posted
Nice,

You oughta play a little with your aperture and check out the cool things you can do there.

you can see in a few of the pics where I greatly reduced the depth of field by messing w/ the aperature.  I've got about 100 pics that I took where I was modifying the aperature, but they weren't quite interesting enough.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Those look really good.  I like the reflection in the car.

 

I've never seen pictures from a digital from anybody that were as good as some of the ones I've seen taken with any model of a Cannon Rebel.  Good luck with the pictures.  My advice, get the slide scanner and keep working with the camera you have, you do a great job with it.

Posted
Those look really good.  I like the reflection in the car.

 

I've never seen pictures from a digital from anybody that were as good as some of the ones I've seen taken with any model of a Cannon Rebel.  Good luck with the pictures.  My advice, get the slide scanner and keep working with the camera you have, you do a great job with it.

Yeah, the Cannon is one of the better low cost 35mm cameras around.  I've had mine for almost three years now and it's worked perfectly.

 

I'm contemplating getting a slide scanner and shooting slide film, but then again, you can't beat the turn around time of digital.  It's pretty convenient having the pics immediately for use.

 

I think if I got a slide scanner I'd be set.  I can't go back to film after doing digital, but unless you shell out major $$$ for a really good digital camera you can't do quite what you can w/ a film camera.

Posted

Nice pics!

 

Digital cameras have come along way. I used to shoot Motorsports with EOS's but now I'm strictly digital and most people can't see the difference. The only time you probably would see a difference is if you were to go to 8x10 or larger print.

Posted

Dude,

I love photography to. I have two Minolta 35mm cameras that I havent used in over 5 years. I'm totaly digital now.

My first digital was a Sony MVC 85 It uses a floppy for storage media and works great when you are in a place where you want to copy the pics fast and hand off a dist to someone else . I use a Minolta Dimage S304 for most all of my photography now. It takes great resolution pics. 3.4 resolution. When printed on glossy photo paper with my HP 5550 printer the resullts are as good as a 35 mm print. I just love to play with my pictures by cropping and such. Digital is the way to go.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...