Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

hey guys our first snow storm, I am going down a hill, light at bottom turns red, I am driving sanely and begin to apply brakes and start to slide out of control, wheel (s) is locked up and no ABS working.

I managed to not crash onto the guy in front of me and also managed to NOT pee my pants, so I SLOWLY made the trip home.

 

Just checked the brake fluid and alot is missing from the master cylinder (rear portion) so I pulled all wheels off to try and find leak etc..... no fluid at any wheel I topped off reservoir and bled ALL brakes after test drive it still does not feel right to me, but the roads are cleared up enough that I cannot check the ABS without putting on a show.

Where on Earth did the fluid go when I performed the leg press move on the pedal?

Bad seal in M/C that leaked into booster and burned in engine?

 

Please give any thoughts I have a new M/C now, but am waiting too see what you gents thing before I install it as it is cold as hell out and I will be doing any repairs in my driveway.

Thanks in advance.

 

Sorry it is a 98 k1500 5.7 4wd auto tranny no lift all stock owned since new and 214000 miles!

Posted

Have you cleaned the frame rails real good where your brake lines run? If not, clean them up, then without moving (& running) active brakes several times. Then check all lines to see if you have a cracked line. I have an old rust bucket '76 Chevy that blew a line & that was the only way to find out the exact leak location.

Posted

If the M/C were full before your incident, you definitely have a leak. If it is the M/C that is leaking, the fluid should show on the outside. In order for the fluid to get sucked into the engine, your brake booster would also have to be bad and allowing brake fluid to pass the booster diaphragm. If that is the case, a new booster would be in order.

 

Check for brake fluid in the vacuum hose going to the booster.

 

Also, check the back-side of all 4 wheels for B/F.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...