Jump to content

"Sure smells like a Chevy"


Rockoo315

Recommended Posts

Posted

Back in December 2007, I was home on leave from the Army. As I was driving around, I passed by the local classic car dealer and spotted an old pick up truck. I pulled over to take a closer look. The truck was a 1972 Chevy C20 Super Cheyenne. The green paint was faded and the tires were worn. But the owner ensured it was mechanically sound. The engine was a 400 ci small block, and the transmission was a TH400. I took it for a test drive and loved it. After about 30 minutes, I was the new owner.

 

I took it home and showed my dad. He got in and the first words he said were, "It sure smells like a Chevy. When I was growing up, you could tell the difference between a Dodge, Chevy, and Ford by the way the interior smelled."

 

Unfortunately due to a PCS to Maryland, I sold that truck and have regretted it ever since. Since buying my current truck, another 3/4 ton Chevy, I have noticed a unique smell about it and brought me back to that day when my dad said, "Sure smells like a Chevy."

 

I thought I would share that story and see how many of you agree about our trucks having a noticeable, unique smell about them.

post-94529-0-89982700-1324165367_thumb.jpg

post-94529-0-89982700-1324165367_thumb.jpg

post-94529-0-89982700-1324165367_thumb.jpg

post-94529-0-89982700-1324165367_thumb.jpg

Posted

Yup the old "Chevy" smell...still have my old '76 that I have stored in Alaska that I'm still working to restore. It most definitely has the smell of classic GM...

The now '06 is not quite the same but it's still tells you your driving the right truck!

Posted

I definately remember my 67 Chevy (pic below) had a certain "Chevy" smell to it. Yea, I miss it. I really haven't noticed a smell to my current truck, but then again 10, 20 so years down the road when I stop to look at some young "whipper-snaper's" 2007 - 2013 turck that he has hot-rodded, I am sure the smell will come back to me and I will miss it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I'm the original poster of this thread; I'm 85,000 miles now with no transmission issues after they did the fluid change without filter at 45,000.  I plan on a fluid change AND filter in another 5,000 miles and agree with you on staying to witness what happens if possible.  Ideally I would have done the filter at 45,000 too, but my original dealer was incompetent.  I've since moved on and get service done by another more reputable dealer, so I'm hopeful they follow the correct procedure at 90,000.  
    • Sure, but they do have some affordable options like the Trax, Trailblazer, Envista, and Encore. Some of these have a cheaper base price than the Civic, though the fuel economy isn’t as high. The main problem is that people WANT the highest trim with all the goodies and finance for like 7 years. That’s how ppl “afford” the more expensive vehicles. 
    • Holy s**t - not much of a parts thrower you say? You BLASTED that thing with the parts cannon!  You'd have been probably $1,000 ahead if you had just brought it to a competent shop rather than shotgunning a bunch of parts it clearly didn't need.   Just FYI - oil additives are really, REALLY good at ONE thing ... and that's emptying your wallet. They're ALL useless gimmicks.   If that has the L94 or L99, then #7 is an AFM cylinder. I'd suspect a failed lifter in that case.   If you leaned on wiring, sensors, and/or connectors while changing the oil, you'll have to check all that to be sure pins didn't get pulled out, connectors broken, etc.. Old wire loom that was barely adequate when new is certainly brittle by year 19 - make sure wires aren't chaffed and shorting out somewhere where you might have leaned. or supported yourself on it.   If your a mechanic, why didn't you just find out what you were missing and troubleshoot from there??  TIMED spark, fuel PSI / injector pulse, air, compression.  Can't make ANY money going the parts cannon route.
    • LOL! Are you joking?? That wax SUCKS! 100% gimmick made to "look" good.    After just TWO winters I had severe surface rusting in patches over 90% of the frame. Only reason it looks great in the pics is because I SATURATED the frame every single fall with used motor oil for 14 of the 16 years I owned it. Otherwise it would've been sent to the crusher 8 years earlier with the speed it was rusting prior!    I sold that POS 3 years ago. Was a gigantic headache the second it rolled off the showroom floor. Brakes pulsated on the TEST DRIVE. Door trim fell off the 1st week! Interior squeaked and rattled, and the drivetrain clunked after 2k miles. 4x4 switch failed shortly after. Front end - ball joints, struts, hub bearings - all failed between 38k-50k. Engine started burning oil at 50k. Rear and and transmission failed before 100k. Nothing but problems, and frustration with the piss-poor engineering designed to make you give up. Well, it worked! Nothing on that truck was easy to remove ... except the wheels. They haven't figured out how to screw that up yet. Give 'em time ...   I won't make that mistake again. EVER.   Such fond memories ... https://postimg.cc/K1qf23tS  https://postimg.cc/gallery/X02z64J  https://postimg.cc/gallery/mHSRXZv  https://postimg.cc/gallery/D4mMRfL
    • Different monitors do their test only under conditions specific to that monitor.  you MIGHT find the drive cycle conditions for the monitor that isn't ready on this site: https://lemon-manuals.la/   If it's not there, then it should be on alldata.com for your truck, but it requires a paid subscription.   And you need to know which specific monitor isn't ready.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...