Jump to content

navigation upgrade help


dmcisaac

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2011 silverado and want to do a navigation upgrade. I was at a gm dealer and they said it cant be done because it is the Ls version and that it is not the amplified system. has anyone done this upgrade? with a gm nav radio.i also inquired at a couple of car audio stores and they told me that i could go aftermarket and retain onstar but i would lose the factory bluetooth controls on the steering wheel. is this true?. has anyone upgraded there radio to a nav unit and kept all functions working. I would like to put a gm unit in if possible, does anyone have the part numbers/ model #s etc of what i would need to do this.

thanks in advance.

Posted

I have a 2011 silverado and want to do a navigation upgrade. I was at a gm dealer and they said it cant be done because it is the Ls version and that it is not the amplified system. has anyone done this upgrade? with a gm nav radio.i also inquired at a couple of car audio stores and they told me that i could go aftermarket and retain onstar but i would lose the factory bluetooth controls on the steering wheel. is this true?. has anyone upgraded there radio to a nav unit and kept all functions working. I would like to put a gm unit in if possible, does anyone have the part numbers/ model #s etc of what i would need to do this.

thanks in advance.

 

 

Hey there, I'm a newbie to the Silverado's but I've been reading quite a bit on here about upgrading to a Navi unit in trucks w/o the Bose system. I believe what they told you is correct in that you cannot add a factory navi unit to any of the trucks that do not have the Bose system. I think this probably has to do with the fact that the navigation units do not have an internal amplifier, therefore you would have to have the Bose system which does have an external amp that powers the speakers.

 

I have decided to go with the Advent navigation system b/c of its simplicity and appearance of the factory units. I recently installed a Pioneer navi deck into my 2009 HHR SS, and what a freakin' headache. $250 dollars in adaptors to retain On-Star, Bluetooth, and steering wheel controls. After I got it all working, I vowed to never do that again (and I've been installing stereos for 15+ years now)....until I researched and read about the Advent OGM-1. Check it out.

Posted

There are some after market nav units out there that are plug and play .I would try one of thoise first before over spending on a system that is not very good.

 

I have the factory system in my 2011. It is horrible. It only takes me to 50%of the places I use it for. You can buy a Garmin for less then $100 that will work better then the $2200 factory system.

Posted

Search on here for info on the unit made my Advent. Better than OEM and plug & play

 

 

Hit adcmobile.com for all the info you could ever want on the Advent unit, including videos and photos, splash screens, etc. You can email me from the "Contact Us" link on the website, or PM me here for more info if you like.

Posted

i have the factory nav. in my 2008 gmc sierra, i hate it as you need to buy onstar turn-turn to get the nav. to work right

Posted

PM me if you are still looking for a factory nav. I have one for sale tha it would work with your none bose truck and is plug and play

Posted

i have the factory nav. in my 2008 gmc sierra, i hate it as you need to buy onstar turn-turn to get the nav. to work right

 

 

What?! You mean you have a nav screen built it but it will not work right without on*? Thats crazy, what a rip off!

 

Or are you talking about that voice-gudiance you get over the radio speakers when you call On* for directions? I remember trying that free when I had the free 3 months when the truck was new - ya ho :/...

 

Ernie

Posted

I have never heard so much dribble against the factory nav. The nav unit does not need Onstar Turn by Turn to work. It has voice directions for any input destination. I also looked at after market nav units for my 2011 HD LTZ. Although there are certainly a number of very capable aftermarket units, they are by no means perfect. I ended up with installing a GM USB DVD unit into my truck. It was actually cheaper than a number of the aftermarket units. What sold me was my preference for the factory Nav screen presentation and the instant on function. The aftermarket nav screen presentation tends to have a Garmin 3D look to it. I just like the factory better. The aftermarket units almost all take time to boot up. With my factory unit, I added a Lockpick to play DVD and Rear Camera while moving.

 

In essense, the decision is not binary. One must take a look at display, bootup, button function at the steering wheel, and look at the entire picture. To simply say the factory unit is junk is an ignorant position to take.

  • 9 months later...
Posted

i just put together a complete factory navigation setup (unit, antenna,harness,amp,disc,backup camera) everything needed. for just shy of $900 and its all plug and play. completely factory.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...