Jump to content

Motor Trend is nucking futs!!


2003Chevy

Motor Trend is nucking futs!!  

10 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted
Motor Trend Named the Ram Motor Trend Truck of the Year!!  I think they lost their minds!  The Silverado or Sierra should have won!! :cheers:  :uhoh:  :smash:  :P
Posted

Come on now,that award lost it's meaning a long time ago.

 

It doesn't matter what manufacturer does it but when a new truck is released it wins the award.

 

Let those who care blow their horns if they wish.Personally I really could not care less which truck they think is best even if they pick a GM.

Posted

i called it 2 yrs ago.

 

Next yr it will be the new nissan  :cheers: (or maybe the new ford)

Posted
Of all three quarter ton trucks on the market now, Dodge is my choice, followed by Ford, then comes GM.  I think GM has really dropped the ball when it comes to real work trucks lately, they just don't measure up to what they once were.  The other two have also cheapened up their trucks as well, but not to the same extent.
Posted

ford is first on my list for next vehicle, then dodge then gm

 

last like Jp,  gm has dropped the ball on quality,  I love the looks of the trucks but the quality is crap

Posted
ford is first on my list for next vehicle, then dodge then gm

LOL, you've said that about the Avalanche, New Ram, '03 Chevy's, and one of the Toyota's (can't remember which one though).  :cheers:  :cheers:

Posted

The award doesn't mean much anymore but in all honesty the Ram HD's are new from the ground up.  THe GM and ford's AREN'T!  That's why it won.  It is the most significantly improved not only over it's previous generation truck, but also up to par with the other two.

 

As to qaulity JP and Larry, This is a new one on me!  We don't see very many coming back for anything other than minor trivial things, but those two are about the same amount as did the 97's like yours JP.  There are common problems that are associated with the previous generation C/K trucks and their are common problems associated with the new Silverado's.  It's 6 of one, half dozen of the other type of situation.  Also, the new 2500HD's and 3500 are physically stronger framewise and stronger engine wise compared to your truck JP.  I'm not seeing where GM dropped the ball?

 

Oh wait, it's that new front end, gotcha!  :cheers:

Posted
transmission total blowing out is far from trival little things, then having rearend trouble since isn't trival either.
Posted
transmission total blowing out is far from trival little things, then having rearend trouble since isn't trival either.

I've got a news flash for you.  Both Dodge and ford have major transmission problems too!  As to your rear end, I could count on my hand the number of truck rear ends that have broken that passed through our service department.

 

The one that did was a previous gen K3500 454, cab/chassis truck with utility bed.  Customer brought it back cause he grenaded the rear end.  Well, after being flatbedded in we see chunks of mud hanging from everything (not just mud coated mind you) kinda tipped us off that it wasn't  a "low qaulity" rear end.  Turns out the customer got stuck in a heap ofmud with the truck in a construction site with somewhere between 12-15k pounds out on the hitch and a good 5,000lbs in the bed.  You don't suppose that if you were that rear, you'd have lasted long with someone trying to "rock" the truck loose shifting between gears at 4,000 some rpm.  I'm surprised the truck didn't puke it's trans all over the place too!

 

I could go through a laundry list of common maladies for both JP's vintage of truck as well as the current gen trucks.  Neither of which include transmissions.  I would put GM Hydramatic's auto transmissions up against any out there.  I guess when BMW and Rolls Royce use them, that has to instill SOME confidence in your product.  We wouldn't want pissed off BMW and Rolls customers.

 

In the end, the problems on the new generation of trucks are also much easier to fix thanks to GM's "Modularization" of most of it than are the previous gen C/K trucks.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
Posted

Could be wrong here but it seem to me the were compairing a Dodge 3/4 ton to everyone elses 1/2 ton. I sometimes think that whoever greases the mag editors best wins T.O.T.Y.

jus my 2scence

Posted
i called it 2 yrs ago.

 

Next yr it will be the new nissan  :crackup: (or maybe the new ford)

It will be the Nissan...that 5.6 will be its ticket to the top spot...that and some bribes...  :loser:

 

I don't pay much attention to those awards at all...they are pointless and irrelevent because no truck is perfect for everyone.  They are still fun to read though.  I will be sure to buy the 2004 magazine w/ the test because of all the new models.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have ordered the car link adapter and registered for the google dev, will need to finish verification process later this evening when I get ahold of our kiddos android tablet. I will be using windows vs mac so hopefully it goes smoothly. I have zero tech background but I feel I can manage this with your write up.    Do you think it will be different for me? My truck is a 2023 GMC 1500, I have looked heavily into the AI boxes but I consistently find common complaints with lag.    Does carplay auto open now that you have it set up when you get in truck and turn it on? Or do you have to do open the app everytime? 
    • I figured you would know about it.
    • It added a cost layer to an already limited production supply. True that. 
    • Swap costs and supply/demand balance. When a barrel comes out of the ground the entire range of products are present but not all at the same percentage.    Breakdown of Refined Products The following table summarizes the approximate output from a standard 42-gallon barrel of crude oil: Product Type Gallons per Barrel Percentage of Total Gasoline 20 gallons 45% Diesel Fuel 9 gallons 21% Other Products 13 gallons 31%   Most of that diesel figure is 'straight run' or cut from the barrel. Gasoline 'cut from the barrel runs 0 to 20% at the crude. So in the crude unit there is more diesel the gasoline, usually.  The full refining experience however gives the tabled values. Ego there is half the diesel than gasoline after the 'first crack' That could be an FCC unit, or Isomax or....   Those units take heavy products and break the big ones into little ones. Those numbers are harder to get hold of but directionally it ends up the same.    Really light products are very profitable. Ethylene and Propylene to name two. Those are cracked from slightly heavier feeds like NG and Propane and Ethane. The cracker harshness determines the feed for distillation. Those feeds come from less profitable products like diesel and gasoline.    So...there is a swap cost. How much market is there TODAY and what crude am I running TODAY..... what is my process capable of always.    There is this as well. The USA uses allot more gasoline than it does diesel so in the cracker the process is tilted to gasoline production which....limits supply of diesel. OTR uses the most and it has different requirements than automotive and agricultural.  Limiting auto products.    You are correct however. It is less refined, just less of it. Allot less. 
    • Most thermostatically controlled ATF systems use a 'wax' pill just like the one in your water thermostat. They work on the expansion volume of the wax and the pill is constructed in such a way as to limit the travel to remain within that range. This means it has an opening temperature often called the 'cracking temperature' and a fully open temperature. For whatever reason oil is designated by it's fully open temperature and water by it's cracking temperature.    Between the two it the "Regulating Temperature" The entire range is about 20 F from closed to open. In your example the lower limit, opening point of 145 F then has a fully open temp of 165 F and a throttling temperature of 155 F.    Thing is, the throttling temperature needs two things to work properly. Enough system load high enough to reach the minimum and a heat sink (cooler/exchanger) large enough to prevent any load applied from exceeding the fully open temperature.    If your system exceeds the fully open temperature it is screaming MORE COOLER.    Here is the silly part of the whole thermostat system where the oil is cooled/heated by the radiator. Nothing is flowing to that system until the oil temperature reaches the cracking temperature unless it is equipped with a minimum flow bypass orifice or a bypass built into the seating surface of the plunger. That system meant to get it up to temp quicker isn't doing a thing until WORK drives if from ambient to cracking temp. One a cold winter day, like zero F, it may never get hotter than about 110 F. Sometimes not even that.    People forget or are young enough to not know that until this millennia transmissions were cooled by the radiator cold tank alone and without a thermostat at all.  In the 50's they weren't even cooled. OEMs learn everything the hard way.    When an OEM tells you the trans "Works best" between 175 F and 220 F it means works best for THEM. The transmission thermostat is fuel play. If you watch you trans temps like I do you will learn that it may take a hundred miles if you are not towing and not driving more than say 55-60 mph on a zero F day to even reach 120 F and it might sit there all day if it's colder. Yet if functions perfectly over about 100 F. It may need to get a bit warmer for the fuel and spark maps to go without an multiplier.    Worry more about too hot. Use a cooler large enough to put that thermostat in range.         
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...