Jump to content

Enfeild .308 bolt action


Dirtautoguy

Recommended Posts

Posted

There is a enfeild .308 bolt action for $225 obo I don't know much about them but I looked it up and I kind of like it can someone give me some more info on these?

Posted

If it is chambered for .308 it may be built on an Indian Ishapore 2A receiver. I have a Gibb's No. 7 Jungle Carbine in .308 and it is one of the nicest "historical" guns I own. "Historical" because while it is supposedly based on an Australian design that was never put into production, it is still a newer production gun that combines some of the best features of the Enfield design (high rate of fire, ruggesdness) with certain improvements (.308 is more common than .303 British, and the infamous "wandering zero" of the original No. 5 Jungle Carbine is a nonissue).

 

I would check it out. If it is a rechambered No. 1 Mk. III or No. 4 Mk. I it may still be worth the money. If it is a Gibb's or other factory rifle I'd say go for it! I thought the Gibbs Rifle Company went out of business a number of years ago, but there is a website and it appears they are back in business. Their versions of the No. 5 and No. 7 are no longer in production, but for reference, you can check out their site: http://www.gibbsrifle.com/historical_remakes_.html

 

As for the Ishapore action, you can bet that it is a good twenty-plus years newer than most British surplus Enfield actions. Mine is stamped "1967", and when I first got it at age eighteen I pondered the history of such a unique rifle. Hey, it was clumped in with a bunch of old WWI and WWII rifles back when Roses carried them (for those of you wondering, Roses was/is a competitor to K-Mart and the like along the Mid-Atlantic, there are still a few stores struggling around Virginia, but most are out of business), this was before the internet had something about everything. I even wrote a story about it that I shared on a few now-defunct forums. When I get back home I can pull it off the hard drive and post it if anyone wants.

 

More on the 2A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishapore_2A1_rifle

Posted

Can't really go wrong with a .308 in any rifle. The .308 is a great round and will get the job done on any game animal in the country. You can also find steel cases ammo such as Hunters dirt cheap for plinking.

Posted

It doesn't compare. Much more power, longer range, better in every way.

 

The Army mainly switched to 5.56 (and later influenced NATO into adopting that round) due to its much lighter weight, controllability on full-auto, and potential to wound the enemy (thus taking at least two more off the battlefield when they evacuate their comrade). The funny thing is that 7.62x51mm NATO was itself originally considered an intermediate round of sorts--the Soviets had their 7.62x39, so the US basically took advantage of newer powders and shortened the .30-06. IIRC, 200 rounds of 5.56 weighs around 7 pounds, while only 100 rounds of 7.62 NATO weighs the same amount, so a rifleman can theoretically carry twice as much ammo. As a SAW Gunner in Baghdad I carried 1200 rounds. Our machine gunners spread that amount around their squad.

Posted

Ok so how much is the gun worth?

 

Depends on a number of things really. Got and pictures? Nobody can tell you how much a specific rifle is worth without seeing it's condition first. In reality, it's worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it.

 

Take AR15/M16/M4 magazines for example. For years a Magpul PMAG cost $11-$13 each and aluminum GI mags went for $9.00.

A few months ago the craziness started and the Magpul PMAGs are going for as much as $150.00 each with GI mags going for $30+ each. Prime example of it's worth whatever people are willing to pay.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way to big should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crosing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...