Jump to content

Dolby Noise Reduction on GM UB1?

uxwbill

Recommended Posts

uxwbill Enthusiast

uxwbill

Posted
Posted

I recently changed out the radio in my 2007 Chevrolet Silverado Classic, from a UB0 CD player only model to a UB1 tape/CD combination model. The UB1 radio came from a 2005 Silverado and was reprogrammed to work with UQ3 speakers.

 

The sound from normal bias cassettes was OK...not perfect, but good enough. Upon discovering that the UB1 can also detect and play chrome/metal tapes, I decided to try it. These tapes, recorded on a known working Technics RS-M218 cassette deck, sounded awful on the UB1. In particular, the treble portion of the sound was highly uneven. Quiet passages would have muffled treble, while louder passages would open up the high frequency response. The result was an uncomfortable "pumping" effect in the treble portion of the audio. I also noticed this happening with an MP3 player built into a cassette shell.

 

I wondered if some part of the cassette player were broken, or if the playback heads were dirty/magnetized. Perhaps the radio needed repair.

 

Before jumping to any conclusions, I tried recording to a metal (type IV) tape with Dolby B noise reduction turned on. This made a HUGE difference in the audio quality when playing the tape back on the UB1. It went from sounding awful to excellent. (I know that using Dolby B NR boosts the high audio frequencies on the tape, but I think that if the radio were broken, I'd still hear the "pumping" effect. Whether my ears are still good enough to perceive it with boosted high frequencies I don't know.)

 

Neither the 2005 Silverado or 2007 Silverado Classic owner's manuals say anything about Dolby B noise reduction capability. Since I've had these radios apart in the past, I looked up the datasheet for the audio processor. This claims that the IC itself does support Dolby B noise reduction for cassette tapes, but I figured it was unused since there is no apparent way to turn it on or off from the front panel controls.

 

Does the UB1 really support Dolby B noise reduction? Is there any way to turn it off for cassettes that don't use it and "cassette shell" adapters?

Carder09 Senior Enthusiast

Carder09

Posted
Posted

Talk about stone age equipment lol. What about an a track or phonograph install as well?

&CDFiXER% Enthusiast

&CDFiXER%

Posted
Posted

On the tapes from the "known working" Technics, how do they sound OK in other equipment? Perhaps the heads or transport itself is out of alignment on the Technics unit and they record/play fine on the Technics but on other equipment the track misalignment from the source becomes an issue?

uxwbill Enthusiast

uxwbill

Posted
  • Author
Posted

On the tapes from the "known working" Technics, how do they sound OK in other equipment? Perhaps the heads or transport itself is out of alignment on the Technics unit and they record/play fine on the Technics but on other equipment the track misalignment from the source becomes an issue?

 

Yes, tapes from the Technics deck sound fine in other equipment. I gave it a very thorough servicing about two years ago and the alignment met the factory specification at that time.

uxwbill Enthusiast

uxwbill

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Talk about stone age equipment lol. What about an a track or phonograph install as well?

 

 

Think it might be time to upgrade bud.

 

Seriously? :troll: That's not exactly an incisive or helpful answer to my question.

 

I have nothing against digital music formats and players. I have an iPod and do the whole iTunes/AmazonMP3 thing. I'm quite well aware that cassette tapes are old school. So what? I like them and they work just fine for what I'm doing!

 

If you can answer my question, please do. I'd greatly appreciate the help. If you would rather make smarty-pants comments about how I'm listening to my music, please don't feel so obliged.

uxwbill Enthusiast

uxwbill

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Anyone?

 

Perhaps the player is just broken somehow. It's had a few sudden reversing fits over the past week. Today when it reversed at the end of a tape side, it started playing at warp speed.

  • 4 months later...
uxwbill Enthusiast

uxwbill

Posted
  • Author
Posted

After some time spent listening to tapes and making new ones to play in the truck, I've come to the conclusion that Dolby B noise reduction is present and seems to be forced on at all times.

 

I don't mind using the noise reduction when it comes to actual tapes, but it's severely annoying when a cassette shell adapter is used to play another source into the radio. It makes no difference if the special "cassette adapter" mode mentioned in the manual is used or not.

 

I guess it's time to look into adding some sort of line level input via the connectors at the back of the set...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      Gas Prices

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • revrnd
      Future GMC Jimmy

      By revrnd · Posted

      What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way to big should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crosing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • revrnd
      Silverado 4500-5500-6500 are they still being produced? Would have sold better as GMCs as well

      By revrnd · Posted

      I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
    • revrnd
      RUMOR / INSIDER: 2027 Silverado Dealer Reveal NEXT WEEK

      By revrnd · Posted

      And overpriced. I was in the Oshawa Truck Plant when they were being built. Very few. I could count on one hand how many I've seen since  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...