Jump to content

08 6.0 catback exhaust?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I am kicking arounf the idea of installing a catback exhaust on my truck, not for sound but some performace gains, and MPG gain. I want a stainless system, and quite as posible. I have narrowed my choice down to the gibson single side cat back because of the claims of quiet towing clamis. Has anyone hear had that exhaust? I already have a k&n FIPK, and a superchips programmer, I hope that a freeer flowing exhaust will help alittle more/

Posted

I would honestly doubt any significant mpg gains on a cat-back system. I have a flowmaster because I like/love the sound mainly. Does it give me more HP over stock, maybe a little, but in our 6000+lbs trucks the stock pipes(your truck has a very similar chassis to the GMT-800 of mine) are pretty good, dual 3 inch pipes, to a restrictive muffler, with a 3.5 single outlet. I would also check flowmaster as they now have some full SS systems. Good luck.

Posted

I have the Gibson single catback on mine and do like it. It adds a rumble just slightly louder than stock. It's stainless and very well built. They have excellent customer service. I called them unsure what I wanted and instead of steering me to the more expensive systems they sell he asked a few questions about what I was really was looking for and he recommended the single catback. His reasons were because I was looking for a nice rumble but not too loud when towing and he said the dual pipes would be too loud especially under towing conditions. I really wanted duals because I love the look of them but he convinced me I wouldn't be happy and I am really glad I took his advice. I would give them a call, they will answer your questions honestly and recommend the right product.

Posted

I have the Gibson single catback on mine and do like it. It adds a rumble just slightly louder than stock. It's stainless and very well built. They have excellent customer service. I called them unsure what I wanted and instead of steering me to the more expensive systems they sell he asked a few questions about what I was really was looking for and he recommended the single catback. His reasons were because I was looking for a nice rumble but not too loud when towing and he said the dual pipes would be too loud especially under towing conditions. I really wanted duals because I love the look of them but he convinced me I wouldn't be happy and I am really glad I took his advice. I would give them a call, they will answer your questions honestly and recommend the right product.

Thanks for the reply. Did you notice any improvment in fuel economy or power at all ?

Posted

Throw a magnaflow 13742 on and call it a day.

I dont want to cut my factory system apart incase I want to reinstall it later.

 

 

I would honestly doubt any significant mpg gains on a cat-back system. I have a flowmaster because I like/love the sound mainly. Does it give me more HP over stock, maybe a little, but in our 6000+lbs trucks the stock pipes(your truck has a very similar chassis to the GMT-800 of mine) are pretty good, dual 3 inch pipes, to a restrictive muffler, with a 3.5 single outlet. I would also check flowmaster as they now have some full SS systems. Good luck.

I know there will not be a significant mpg gain, just hoping to gain insted of loose. Thanks for the sugesstion on the flowmaster, but I like my tow rig quiet. I have flowmasters on my offroad toy.

Posted

Take to a muffler shop, with whatever muffler you want, have them flange the new exhaust from the y, from there, you can have a single in, dual out or single in, single out without chopping factory exhaust and it will be way cheaper than buying a name stamped on some shiny piping. But what do I know, I only spent $700 ish for my Lt headers, custom x piping to two cherry bomb extremes dumped before the axle.

Posted

If you want to keep the factory setup to possibly reinstall at a later date, you can get the "band style exhaust clamps"(Summit, Jegs etc), cut the factory pipes at a good location, install the muffler you like, and then be good to go. Also really any aftermarket muffler flows much better than the stock setup, so you will most likely gain HP/TQ whatever you choose. And yes you are right about not getting a flowmaster if you want a quiet exhaust. Flowmaster and quiet do not go together. And like I said before I really got mine for the sound as the main reason. I have heard a Gibson in person, and it was close to stock. The only other thing that I would suggest is getting a system that has a pre-muffler (resonator), because our truck exhaust is known to have a drone if all you do is put a different muffler on it. Good Luck

 

 


.

Posted

Thanks for the reply. Did you notice any improvment in fuel economy or power at all ?

I really can't say for sure. They claim something like 10-15 increase in torque and hp but you know how that goes, usually a little optomistic. I also had LT tires put on at the same time because I towed a heavier rv and with the much heavier tires I actually went down in mileage a hair. I basically put the exhaust on for the nice sound and between that the the Airraid intake hoped to even out the losses from the LT tires. I had a local shop cut off my factory exhaust so I could keep it. Ths Gibson without the resonator doesn't drone any more than the stock one when it goes to v4 mode so its not bad. If you search around you should be able to find the stainless single catback for between $600-$700.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was using recirc/max air. Especially if it really hot i start out by lowering the front windows a little with regular ac the go to recirculation after a few and rolling windows up. And it does not have the newest refrigerant. It has per the info under the hood r134. Not the new r1234yf.  
    • tldr; Shade tree mechanic stumped by variable displacement AC compressor.   Not Silverado related, but for my 2000 Camaro SS. I've never really used the AC since acquiring the car a good handful of years ago. I plan to take it on a trip this summer so I wanted to make sure the AC was in good shape. On an 73 degree day in the shop with the car idling I set the AC on "Max", temp set to cold, and fan on hi. The compressor turned on and air turned nice and cold.   I let it run for several minutes but noticed the compressor never cycled off. The engine was up to temperature enough that it began cycling the cooling fans on high. I had a set of manifold gauges hooked up and it was consistently at about 25 psi on the low side and between 200 and 225 psi (warm engine) on the high side. Per temperature charts, the low side is low (should be 30-35) and the high side is a little high (up to 170 per chart). I read the low pressure as potentially being under-charged underscored by a continually running compressor This was also underscored by temp readings of mid-20 degrees at the vents. Not just cold, freezing cold. Switching off the AC but leaving the HVAC fan on high produced a deluge of condensation underneath the vehicle. I was getting ice buildup on the evap core most likely.   The low reading (25psi) concerned me that the compressor wasn't switching off so I swapped out the pressure switch. No change in behavior, still ran constantly.   The AC clutch works fine as it engages/disengages with the HVAC switch on command. The compressor relay is good as I swapped it with two different known good relays just to be sure. Having eliminated that, and the pressure switch, I added refrigerant, thinking the constant run and low "low" pressure were signs of a slight undercharge. Makes sense, the car is 26 years old and it doesn't appear the AC system has ever been touched.   Adding some R134a didn't meaningfully change the low side pressure. And that's when a lightbulb flashed upstairs. While I consider the car "old", it's possibly "new" enough to have a variable displacement compressor. Did some reading and sure enough. Dangit. I don't work on these for this reason.   Adding refrigerant means the compressor will just compensate and won't really change pressures until it's severely overcharged or undercharged. But at least I wasn't getting ice/frost anymore, but instead high 30 degree temps out of the vents. That's more normal, but with variable displacement now I have no idea where my charge level is at. It's probably overcharged now. The high side even with the engine radiating serious heat was never really over about 225.   The static pressure at room temperature is dead on, before and after the charge. Both high/low equalize after some rest.   I'm thinking I'll need to take it to a shop. I want the proper charge level so I'm not working the compressor too hard. The only way to get an accurate charge is to evacuate and then re-charge with the exact amount specified for the system -- at least that's what I'm reading.   Anyone here with modern automotive AC knowledge?  
    • Mine is in the shop for the AC now. While it did get cold after a bit, it would take a while to even start to cool the air at all. Turns out the compressor was bad and cycling. 
    • I call B.S. when I first moved to Texas my first house would only cool to 80 with the Texas heat. The AC tech said it was normal at 100 degrees outside. I remodeled the house put in a new AC. I could hang meat. My cars may need recirculating to start. Once moving it switches to regular AC and I could hang meat. Living in Texas no one would put up with only 20 degrees difference. 
    • AC in home or auto only cool down 15-25 degrees from outside temp, but what will help is to put the ac in recirc mode this will recirc the Inside cabin air rather then trying to cool down the outside hot air, I always have mine in recirc mode.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...