Jump to content

Rookies face big challenge at Daytona


Elwood

Recommended Posts

Posted

Rookies face big challenge at Daytona

 

By JENNA FRYER, AP Sports Writer

 

February 12, 2003

 

DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. (AP) -- It's bumper-to-bumper and fender-to-fender at 190 mph. Decisions must be made in the blink of an eye, and the slightest slip can be disastrous.

 

Drafting at Daytona isn't easy, especially for rookies trying to earn the trust of their competitors.

 

 

A day after rookie Jack Sprague caused a five-car accident in the first drafting session of the season, the six-member rookie class had a hard time making friends on the track.

 

Casey Mears spent much of Wednesday's first practice running all alone behind Dale Jarrett, unable to hook up with any other veterans.

 

``We're trying to keep him kind of low-profile out there and not do anything too wild because it's so critical he earns the respect from his competitors,'' said Jimmy Elledge, Mears' crew chief.

 

``We've got to make it so we won't have to tie a big ol' bone around his neck just to get the big dogs to play with him when it comes time to race.''

 

Drafting is essential in the Daytona 500 because carburetor restrictor plates required here by NASCAR sap horsepower and keep the cars in large packs that are often two and three wide.

 

So the drivers hook up with the car in front of them, bumper-to-bumper. The air from the first car in line pulls the others along behind it, with the rear cars able to slingshot when they pass, with the aid of that airflow.

 

But veterans generally aren't comfortable lining up with a rookie who is trying to get a feel for a Winston Cup car on one of the biggest and fastest tracks on the circuit.

 

``If I had my pick, I wouldn't want to work with a rookie,'' said four-time Winston Cup champion Jeff Gordon. ``You have to kind of watch to see who looks comfortable out there, who knows what they are doing and isn't trying anything too aggressive.''

 

It's a shared attitude, especially after Sprague's wreck Tuesday with less than five minutes left in the first practice session of the 2003 season.

 

Sprague bumped Steve Park, starting a chain reaction crash that forced Mike Skinner, Elliott Sadler and Jeff Burton into their backup cars.

 

``Unfortunately, we had an accident, and it puts rookies under a microscope even more so than usual,'' said rookie Larry Foyt. ``You can't do anything stupid, you try not to jump around and be crazy. Even doing all those things, I haven't had a whole lot of guys working with us and it's been frustrating.''

 

Not even Jamie McMurray, who earned drafting experience when he was thrown into the fire last season by making his Winston Cup debut at Talladega, had many friends on Wednesday.

 

Teammate Sterling Marlin worked with him a little bit, and good friend Jimmie Johnson gave him some help, but he said many of the cars avoided him. Whenever he closed in on the speedy Chevrolets of Dale Earnhardt Jr. and Michael Waltrip, McMurray noticed that all his competitors wanted to hook up with them.

 

``It seemed like guys were doing crazy things to get in line with them,'' McMurray said. ``So I really think if you have a good car, guys will be forced to work with you because they'll want your help.''

 

Mears spent most of his time at the three practice sessions working specifically on drafting, knowing how hard it will be for him to prove himself to the field. With just one year of stock-car experience -- last season in the Busch Series -- he knows everyone is checking his credentials.

 

``When I was a veteran in any other series, I intentionally didn't work with rookies because you don't trust them,'' Mears said. ``I don't take it hard. I'm just trying to show them we can all be friends.''

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I just can't think of the exact term GM uses for that higher gvw package without looking at the website but basically sort of a trailering package and I imagine it may also have been created to skirt around the licensing fee differences between a3/4 and 1 ton that apply in some states although ironically I believe in some states its the reverse that a 1 ton is the cheaper truck to license over a 3/4 ton. It makes no difference here in Alberta but oddly enough a 1 ton through my insurance company is a bit cheaper to insure over a 3/4 ton as its based on the insurance statistics they generate.    For sure when ever you do have the chance to weigh your truck and to be fair, try to have the fuel tank full or nearly so rather than give yourself a false sense of the truck being lighter by having an almost empty tank.    In my other comment I was mentioning stock sized tires and partly in case someone was reading this and thinking they could lower their pressure down to what your aftermarket tires are able to do with your empty truck as that is a vastly different picture in the leeway you have to play with for running minimum pressures while remaining safe. I will say also that its easy to see from reactions of truck owners that may have been more used to owning a half ton in the past or a car and be it on a forum like this or in person etc that they get so wrapped up in that placard pressure sticker that they can't get their head wrapped around the fact that an HD truck due to how much it can carry can also vary the tire pressures drastically lower than those pressures ( typically more so for the rear axle on stock sized tires ) when empty vs some car that isn't made to carry much so the tire pressures can't be lowered since it needs almost that much pressure just to carry the empty car.    If I ever do find myself in the states with this truck, I will only be too happy to switch it over to the US measuring system as then I will understand all the dash readings. The only thing that is off for me slightly with US measurements is US miles per gallon as I grew up with the Imperial gallon and to this day up here anyway speak in Imperial miles per gallon ( I don't do that on this forum though as that would confuse everyone for no good reason ). 
    • Yes that's right, it's the upgrade that includes the overload spring and all that stuff.   Someday when I'm empty and going by a scale I'm going to stop in and get some weight readings.   Exactly  you should have the ability to change individual settings, in in Canada so I'm driving with kph but then I'm stuck with kpa when I want psi lol    
    • You must have that upgraded gvw package which is only available or at least was in 2025 with the diesel engine for the 3/4 ton and that gave the truck physically the larger 12.0 ring gear rear diff and the 3500 rear spring pack. There is a difference in what the diff housing looks like externally as one tell tale and also your truck should have the upper overload spring pack and the frame pads that the pack goes up against.    The pressure the tpms system kicks the alarm in on a stock setting truck, that is a good question and was just from what I recall but I doubt I made any notes on it as I knew for the rear that it was not at all what I was after regardless either. Being that you have a diesel and if running on stock tires the minimum pressure on an empty truck seems to be around 50 psi from hearing of those that have weighted the front axle but the rear axle is very similar in weight to a gas truck and again a near empty truck on the rear could go down to 35 pounds at minimum. However the weigh scale is the proper way to know for sure as a guide.    As to changing the readings on the dash from metric to the US measuring system, oh yes that is done easily but what I was attempting to explain was that I can't pick and choose items I want to have in US and those I still want in the metric system at the same time as its either all or none. For example lets say you drove into Canada and switched your dash over to metric so your speedometer read in km an hour, well then your reading kilopascals on your tpms readout and your wife looks over and says what the hell is that saying in the tpms screen and you say "darned if I know, I think its Chinese" !
    • This is partly why I decided to have switched over to Amsoil SS as a way of hopefully preventing the buildup of the sludge/carbon on the pistons and clogging of the oil control rings and the carbon that would cause the compression rings to stick in their grooves as well as stay cleaner up top of the heads in the valve train in the first place, an oil that has tested better by third party testing over typical shelf oil and also doing my best to run relatively short OCI. However in saying that I don't think there is any way to easily prove the oil I was using prior allowed for a buildup at the OCI I was doing, nor in the other direction to make claims the Amsoil is keeping everything clean either. There really isn't a window into the engine is there to know anything for certain even if oil samples were taken for example that showed still healthy oil being dropped out of the oil pan other than engine tear downs that extensive and expensive testing of oils does to actually visually see what is really going on inside the engine. I wish there was some easy method of seeing what is going on but I don't happen to be aware of that if there is.  
    • My truck is a ¾ ton but my placard also says 80 for the rear tires, I think I might have the upgraded suspension to the 3500 series maybe.   I put my air down to 60 and the light was still on, and there was no way I was putting over 60 psi in the rear empty and not towing because I knew the actual number Toyo gave me and I didn't wanna ruin the center of my tires!   And you actually can change it in the settings from metric or is and it will show kph or mph then when you go into your tire settings it will be either psi or kpa, but it would be nice to just change it directly on the tire psi page 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...