Jump to content

35 on stock sierra?

foleyalman

By foleyalman
in Tires, Wheels & TPMS

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
davidkeith33 Enthusiast

davidkeith33

Posted
Posted

I'm am about to buy tires, and my father-in-law who works for GM is tellin me that 33/12.50/17 will run my fender wells. I put the leveling kit on the front. Do you have any rub problems or any problems for that matter with your 33's? I'm really wanting to go 33 so any info will be great!

foleyalman Enthusiast

foleyalman

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I had 33X12.5X17 on my 05 sierra NO issues with clearance on stock suspension.... I just got 295/70/17 Nitto Terra Grapplers, I suggest those as they are narrower but taller and all terrain if you use your truck as a DD.

LTZ2014 Enthusiast

LTZ2014

Posted
Posted
I run 33x12.50x17 can I fit 35 in my sierra?

 

No way. I can't believe you were even able to fit 33's without your tires ripping into your fender. Any pics?

 

 

 

cparks555 Senior Enthusiast

cparks555

Posted
Posted

I had 33x12.50x17 on my '05 also, wheel wells are much bigger than the '07-13 trucks. 35's with a crank, I see it all the time around my parts...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Slate Electric Truck

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • KARNUT
      Slate Electric Truck

      By KARNUT · Posted

      Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Atlas
      Slate Electric Truck

      By Atlas · Posted

      Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • Grumpy Bear
      Slate Electric Truck

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Interesting pivot.  
    • Atlas
      Slate Electric Truck

      By Atlas · Posted

      The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...