Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 hours ago, Elripster said:

I did model them in SolidWorks but I have not built to the model. I just made them to-fit with my band saw.

 

So my prototypes are urethane bar stock.  I used (2) 1.5" square pieces (24" length) glued together but going forward I would use something harder.  Maybe something like this...  https://www.mcmaster.com/#=1ava2d9

 

I also suspect going to 36" will help as well.  I use 2" wide weather stripping between the bars and roof itself.

 

I drilled holes to get the radii and then cut into them tangentially with the band saw to try to mimic the shape of the roof racks.  I did have to purchase the roof racks separately since my truck did not come with them.

 

The good news is that I am completely happy with this truck.  I went up a size to some more off road worthy tires since I camp and occasionally get the truck into 4 low (locker works!).  It rougher as expected but it's not different now than any other truck with larger harder tires.

 

If this does not get rid of the booming, Dynamat or equivalent will.  Buffeting is a very low frequency phenomenon where the booming is higher in frequency and well addressed by Dynamat or similar.

 

image.thumb.png.15a8355a51829b29d85690cce6897047.png

 

 

Thanks, Frank.  I plan to build mine next week when my cross rails arrive. 

Posted

I have a dilemma. My dealer admitted there’s been a problem with ‘15’s and ‘16’s coming back on a regular basis. He said he hasn’t seen it with ‘17’s and 18’s. It’s the end of the year and he’s offering 20% of MSRP on an ‘18 2WD Denali if I trade in my ‘15. I was one of the lucky ones who bought my ‘15 from him 3 years ago and didn’t have any noise or vibration problems. $62k out the door with TT&L and extended warranty on a $75k sticker. The catch is, I sign the papers tomorrow - the Denali is sight unseen until it arrives next week. The GM said I can cancel the deal if I don’t like the two arriving next week. Is the deal too risky on an ‘18?

 

Posted
1 hour ago, ChicTrucks said:

I was one of the lucky ones who bought my ‘15...Is the deal too risky on an ‘18?

There is not enough owner input if the ‘18 will be risky or not, but the difference in these trucks is whether you were lucky or not.  It took 7 years for this current generation change, so whatever is going on with the unlucky owners will probably not change until the generation 5 (21/22) version.  The body style, suspension, and chassis remains the same, adding bells and whistles year after year is not getting to the heart of the issue.  Hats off to the owners attempting to mitigate the issues, but also being one of the lucky owners, I wouldn’t be looking to push that luck.

Posted

I would say too risky.  This issue is a design flaw.  The trucks have terribly thin sheetmetal that is poorly supported.  The next body restyle will hopefully address it.

 

Frank

Posted

I keep hoping for changes to the Yukon. 2007 was a bad model year. There were so many improvements over the next 7 years and it became a great SUV. The dealer told me they were getting killed with the ‘15 and ‘16 models. He said they aren’t seeing it on 17 and 18. They can’t keep the Denali in stock. I also learned the Yukons come on a truck with crappy black wheels. The 20’s and 22’s are added at the dealership. They’re shipped completely separate and aren’t assigned to a car. There’s a warehouse of wheels...they grab a pair and stick them on a Denali before putting it on the lot. 

Posted

Ya know, you can blame wheels, etc... all day long.  The bottom line is every other vehicle runs them just fine.   These trucks require unicorn grade carparts to be livable which even if you find them, will become sub-unicorn grade when the age/wear.  Anyway, your money, spend it where you'd like.  You asked if it  was risky, I am an engineer and I would suggest steering clear until the next body restyle.  

 

If you look up under the headliner, you will see  there  is very little metal up there.  The  roof bows are very flimsy and they support a paper-thin roof.  That is the heart of the issue.

 

Frank

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 12/22/2017 at 1:55 PM, Elripster said:

You can just see them here...  

 

image.thumb.png.ccb3088c633fd2fafd7ee1671ade927e.png

 

 

I made mine with a 2x4 and foam weather stripping.  It helped with the buffeting and ear discomfort so now I plan to build a better-looking one. 

IMG_1067.JPG

Posted (edited)

After driving the 2018 Yukon Denali for a week, I decided to trade in my ‘15 and buy it. The 10-speed transmission is smooth and the noise and pressure are non-existent. My family says this one is smoother and quieter than my ‘15. I had them remove the 22’s for 20’s before I drove it. Don’t know if the wheels on an ‘18  make a difference.  I love it! Really impressed. 

Edited by ChicTrucks
Posted (edited)

About 150 or so posts back in this thread, I commented about wanting to purchase a new Suburban, but because of the problems mentioned here, I would wait. Well, the wait is over. I picked up a new 2018 in December. I test drove the vehicle specifically looking for the booming and buffeting problems around 40 and 70 mph. If I tried real hard I could pick up minimal buffeting and the booming was similar to what I've had in my 4 previous Suburbans. Neither were excessive enough for me not to purchase this vehicle.

 

The vehicle has 20" wheels, 3.42 gear ratio, a sunroof, Continental all-season tires, the 5.3l V8. I have noticed that at about a steady 40 mph, the transmission is in a gear that allows the engine to be lugging while trying to maintain that speed, and you can sense some buffeting trying to happen. It almost sounds as if the exhaust is creating a drone at that rpm range under load. It doesn't seem to matter whether it's in 4cyl or 8cyl mode. By selecting the tow/haul mode, the lugging goes away because the transmission then shifts to a lower gear and the minimal buffeting stops. The same situation happens at about 70 mph and by switching to tow/haul mode, the lugging/buffeting goes away. It seems that 40 and 70 mph are the points where the transmission is near the shift point. I suspect some of the concerns with these vehicles result from the programming of the transmission shift points resulting in the transmission staying in too high of a gear for too long so they can claim better fuel mileage.

 

I'm very happy with this vehicle and I'm glad I waited. I may have been lucky enough to find a good one and I hope it stays that way. When you're driving what amounts to an empty airplane fuselage on wheels down the road, noises will surely show up. 

Edited by dbdave
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I have a 2015 Chevy Suburban LTZ and unfortunately it has the booming and buffeting  issue bad! I drove for 10 days and couldn't figure out why my ears were plugging. Finally it got so bad that my daughter got car sick and it gave me the worst headache of my life. We took it back to our dealer and they have been trying to fix it for 2 months! So my question is do we get something different or are the newer models less prone to this issue?

Edited by Speedbealady
Posted

Good that the dealer is making an attempt, unfortunately they won't figure anything out.  You have a truck with detached roof bows, the dealer would have to do something like what was mentioned by Shaun and Elripster.  If not, look for something different 'cause these trucks won't change until 2021, when the gen 5s come out.

Posted

They have already checked the roof bows and claimed they were attached, applied noise cancelling material, changed the muffler, and replaced tires and rims.  I'm bummed because these trucks are quite dazzling and fit my family perfectly.  I also have a 2002 and its been great! Maybe a 2014 even though the interior isn't  my cup of tea. 

Posted

Everything you mentioned has been tried, your dealer is attempting to make this truck tolerable for you.  Keep your expectations very low and don't be dazzled by just the bells and whistles.   

 

The 2014 (gen 3) is a decent truck, though technologically dated by today's SUV standards. 

Posted

Test drove a z71 Tahoe recently.  I was able to do an extended (20-30 mile) test drive.  Noticed something was off but couldn't tell exactly what.  Kept getting a strange pressure feeling in one ear.  While driving on the highway I looked in the rear view mirror and could see both headrests on the rear captain chairs shaking badly.  It was then that I realized the vehicle had this constant vibration and drone noise.  Dealer tried to tell me it was due to new tires that haven't been "broken in".  Even had me test drive another z71 with him on the highway.  Could feel the vibration in that one also.  Walked away without purchasing it.  Didn't want to deal with the headache (literally).   

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,647 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...