Jump to content

Tire Pressure?????


Recommended Posts

Posted

OK

 

I have had many vehicles, but I'm confused on the tire pressure off the 2500HD. I have a 2003 2500HD and the tie pressure from the factory is 60 Front 80 Rear. Of course I pick the truck up and I have 4 different tire pressure in each tire rangeing from 36 to 48.

 

I have been reading a little on-line and so many different suggestions. I figure if I'm towing or plowing I'll go with the recomend 60/80, but with nothing it seems excesive. I'm currently at 40 all around because the local gas station doesn't fill any higher than 40 and I figured thats better than what the dealer gave me 36/44/40/48.

 

The last truck I had was an 86 k1500 with 32" BF'S and I ran 36 and 30 in the rear. The LT tire is throwing me off.

 

Help.

 

Thanks

Posted

Before I switched over to the 265's I ran my stock Firestones at 55 front and 50 rear.  That seemed to give the best contact patch.

 

I run my 265 Michelins at 50 PSI all the way around.  They have been on the truck for about 4500 miles and are showing no signs of cupping etc...

Posted

I run 45 all around....non tow...and 55 when towing in my 02 HD. The best thing to do is run a pressure that you feel comfortable with for a few 1000 miles - then check the tire  wear. When I ran 55 all around empty....I had center tire wear..so I lowered it to 45...that seems to be the best pressure for me. Plus - dont forget to rotate 7500 miles.

 

The 80 in the rear is MAX pressure...unless you are towing a house...I dont think you will need that much pressure...Plus you truck will ride like a rock !!

 

Just my 2 cents

Posted

Welcome to the forum...  :devil:

 

When I had the stock tires on I ran 55 front and 50 rear, but I like a firm ride. I think 40 is perhaps a bit low, but anything 45 or more should be okay.

Posted
I run 55 front and 80 rear for towing a little over 9,000# the stability is much better; when not towing i like to run 45# all around. Your dealer must have been setting your tires for a NASCAR race. :devil:  :flag:  :flag:
Posted

Run 90 psi all the way around...

 

no wonder why your bfgs only last 10K miles  :devil:

Posted

i run 40, what do others go to with 285's?

My 285's max at 65, so I run 45 front and 40 rear. If I load the bed, or I'm towing, I'll set the rears at 55-60.

Posted
I just checked my tires today and set my 265/75 load range D at 46 psi cold each tire. With a plow on or my travel trailer I'll bump that axle up to 56 psi cold. The front really needs the extra 10-12 psi for the plow-7 1/2 western pro plow, but the rear doesn't seem bad even if left at 46 psi.My trailer is 27 feet and about 4900 dry and closer to 6000 loaded. I sometimes wish I left my load range E tires on but the 8 ply D seem just fine.God bless America and all our soldiers and vets. :chevy:  :flag:  :flag:
Posted
Run 90 psi all the way around...

 

no wonder why your bfgs only last 10K miles  :chevy:

No to be honest I think that just over use wore the tires out.. I've yet to have a tire last over 20K...Lots and lots of pulling plus lots of driving, heavy loads, and many drivers that don't care about the truck are all factors in the tires life.. Our Cummins has had great luck out of Michellen LTX's so I might go with a set....I don't care about look any more just want some life out of them..

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
    • Our customers' safety isn't something we take lightly. To ensure you get the proper assistance for your truck's repairs, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.
    • We appreciate you sharing your experience with your truck. To ensure we get you the proper assistance, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...