Jump to content

Interesting 4-1-1 here......


76BBSub

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've learned some interesting stuff lately.......

 

 

Did you know Fed-Ex Delivery Drivers have to Buy their delivery trucks?

 

 

 

Did you know that "fake sugar" (mainly nutra-sweet) has been known to cause brain tumors?

 

Interesting......

Posted

Quote from General Lee 01, posted on Nov. 05 2001,3:28

Did you know Fed-Ex Delivery Drivers have to Buy their delivery trucks?

 

 

 

why??  that is stupid.  does the same apply for UPS drivers?

Posted

Hmmm...my brother in law has worked for FedEx for several years and didn't have to buy a truck.  I wonder if it's some kind of regional thing or what?

Jeff

Posted

I thought that was the case for RPS, but I didn't know FedEx was the same...

 

I thought RPS was a "franchise" type of operation.  You buy your truck and your territory...

Posted

Quote from General Lee 01, posted on Nov. 04 2001,4:28

Did you know that "fake sugar" (mainly nutra-sweet) has been known to cause brain tumors?

 

I think the notice also includes "in California rats".

 

What about the rats in the rest of the US?

Must be a California thing!  :thumbs:

Posted

Quote from mblrds, posted on Nov. 05 2001,8:08

Quote from General Lee 01, posted on Nov. 04 2001,4:28
Did you know that "fake sugar" (mainly nutra-sweet) has been known to cause brain tumors?

 

I think the notice also includes "in California rats".

 

What about the rats in the rest of the US?

Must be a California thing!  :thumbs:

 

You're almost right about the tumors, but you also have to keep in mind that the rats were fed over 2x there body weight in nutra-sweet, so, that would be the reason for the brain tumors.  There was a big scare about it a while ago, but no one had really made it public that the results were worthless because the rats had been fed pounds of the stuff daily.  No human eats that much, and if we did, we'd still be okay because a few pounds still isn't that much on the avg 180 pound person.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

OK, here's the scoop on FedEx Jeremy.  I got this info from my wife and her corner office.

 

We were both right!!!  FedEx now has what they call "FedEx Ground" service.  It is actually the old RPS that they bought, and re-named.  These old RPS drivers do own their own trucks, and they are now known as FedEx Ground...

Posted

Yep. my bro-in-law told me about the buyout, the old RPS trucks are now the FedEx trucks with the green in the graphics.  He works for the "original" FedEx...in a rural area, no less.  Anyone ever heard of Mart, Texas?  How about Clifton?  They are both kinda near Waco.

Jeff

Posted

The Fedex home delivery drivers have to buy their own vans. Fedex is trying to seperate home delivery from business delivery in some regions. The home delivery drivers are contract labor for Fedex and aren't actually on the payroll. They also have to remove the magnetic Fedex signs from the vans after their last delivery of the day. I have a friend I went to college with that is the manager of the new Fedex home delivery division here.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...