Jump to content

Should this be here?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Just noticed this cable or wire (not sure what it is, brake stuff?) hanging this weekend when I dropped a fishing lure under my truck. It seems like it should be tucked somewhere more out of the way. I'm wondering if it wasn't put back correctly after having the shocks swapped out? Just seems like it would snag something rather easily going off-road. Looked at a picture I took the day I got the shocks swapped out, and it's been like that since then. I never had any need to look under there before, so don't know if it's always been like that or not.

Thanks for the input guys.

 

c7166e0adc449249e8b2c231da6abf79.jpg

 

 

 

-Skeet

Posted

That's been typical of GM designs for a while now. Low hanging wires that can snag on things....I agree it's not a good design for going off road at all. I'm guessing it's related to the brakes since I've always seen them on Suburbans/Tahoes and trucks with rear disc brakes but my 2007 Silverado with rear drums did not have those lines/wires hanging down.

Posted

Mine is the same as well.

Posted

Mine is the same as well.

Guess it's normal then lol. Seems odd though for sure, I can see a tree limb popping up from running over it and ripping through that thing man.

 

 

-Skeet

Posted

Guess it's normal then lol. Seems odd though for sure, I can see a tree limb popping up from running over it and ripping through that thing man.

 

 

-Skeet

 

Yeah "off road" really means "off freshly paved asphalt." A grass field or gravel road is about all the off roading you want to be doing with a stock truck haha

Posted

Haha! I won't be going far off the beaten path, I'm still babying her. The farthest off road I'll be going is down to the lake or river to drop some kayaks and lines in the water or up to the camp. Won't be doing any rock crawling or muddin' around the woods. I couldn't anyway with those stock goodyears lol. I really wanna get rid of them, just can't justify it...yet.

 

 

-Skeet

Posted

Just an FYI, discount tire will give you a credit on the good years, I got $200. Not much, but better than $0 and I wasn't a fan of them.

Posted

I saw a few other members talking about that too. I'm guessing you need to be near a store to do this? Shipping seems like it would kill that deal. When I was looking into getting a new set, I think the closest one to me was Columbus, Ohio if I remember right.

 

 

-Skeet

Posted

Yeah, would have to be a local DT store to you I'm guessing.

Posted

Just noticed this cable or wire (not sure what it is, brake stuff?) hanging this weekend when I dropped a fishing lure under my truck. It seems like it should be tucked somewhere more out of the way. I'm wondering if it wasn't put back correctly after having the shocks swapped out? Just seems like it would snag something rather easily going off-road. Looked at a picture I took the day I got the shocks swapped out, and it's been like that since then. I never had any need to look under there before, so don't know if it's always been like that or not.

Thanks for the input guys.

 

c7166e0adc449249e8b2c231da6abf79.jpg

 

 

 

-Skeet

A little off topic but how do you like the Bilsteins shocks?

Posted

The odds of snagging something is surprisingly low. I drive off road a few times a week in my company rig (currently a 2012 F150) and they all have had low hanging brake lines. I am pretty rough on these trucks and over the years and have never had a brake line ripped off. You would also be surprised where you can take a stock half ton truck with decent tires (and air dams removed), especially if it is not yours!

Posted

The odds of snagging something is surprisingly low. I drive off road a few times a week in my company rig (currently a 2012 F150) and they all have had low hanging brake lines. I am pretty rough on these trucks and over the years and have never had a brake line ripped off. You would also be surprised where you can take a stock half ton truck with decent tires (and air dams removed), especially if it is not yours!

 

Yeah I need to remove my air dam

Posted

A little off topic but how do you like the Bilsteins shocks?

Love them, I've got them at the highest setting up front and have no complaints. Handles all types of bumps better than the ranchos.

 

The odds of snagging something is surprisingly low. I drive off road a few times a week in my company rig (currently a 2012 F150) and they all have had low hanging brake lines. I am pretty rough on these trucks and over the years and have never had a brake line ripped off. You would also be surprised where you can take a stock half ton truck with decent tires (and air dams removed), especially if it is not yours!

Lol! When I was with the WV DOT I gave my company vehicles hell. Of course some of the roads we owned were actual creek beds and/or so old and overgrown they looked like quad trails, "unmaintained roads" as we called them. I had a dodge Dakota crew cab I got with 150k+ miles on that I ruined the front end in going off road. Got a jeep liberty after that and dogged it out on trails and creek beds for 80k miles. Took a new jeep patriot for a few weeks on some flood work for FEMA, then someone higher on the food chain decided they wanted that one. Then I got put in a damn s10 with the steering wheel dry rotting, ac only worked on the highest fan speed and had to recharge it a few times a week, and it wouldn't go over 40 uphill if the radio and AC were both on lol. Got put in a couple other ones until I got a new expedition and was told to be easy on it bc they were leasing it. I asked how they planned to lease it when they drilled holes everywhere for lights and light bars as well as gut the back seat and add shelves, no response. Man I miss getting to drive for free haha. Oh yes I got an escape that was 2wd and my solution to getting out of it was getting it stuck in mud on what we called "the road to nowhere". Basically an old coal haul road leading to a strip bench. Tried to give me a 90s model Taurus and a newer fusion, I told them I could get both stuck without leaving town, must have 4wd lmao.

 

 

-Skeet

Posted

I am in the timber industry and I am in WV quite a bit (along with 4 other states) and I go from riding 5 hours straight on the interstate to climbing some goat path or muddy logging road in 4wd the rest of the day. I always get a chuckle out of friends and family who insist that one particular brand or truck/car is better than the other. I put around 50k a year on a truck and get a new one every 3 years (150k miles) and myself and the guys I work with have had good ones to really bad ones, no matter the brand. We never have engine problems but at around 120k miles we usually start getting front end, transmission, and transfer case problems. We also get the oil changed with what ever is on contract which is usually no name dyno oil and we rarely get the oil changed on time. Makes you take a different look at vehicle reliability and how funny the "what oil do you use" threads are. My silverado though is a garage queen that rarely sees nothing much worse than a muddy field during hunting season and spends most of her time staying parked (about 4k miles a year). I don't tow much or haul a whole lot, just like full size V8 trucks. Kept my 2002 for 12 years and would have kept it longer if it had not started to rot out on me, hope to keep this 2014 for 12 or more years as well.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...