Jump to content

2500 Gas or Diesel


Recommended Posts

Posted

Unless you've had a 2500 or 3500 in the past, be sure to test drive one.

 

We would be towing less than 5% of the time.

 

Took my wife along for the drive and she could not wait to leave the dealership. Way too rough a ride for her taste.

 

Switched our search for a 1500 6.2L with Max Towing Package.

 

I traded my 2014 1500 5.3 max tow for a 2500 duramax. The only compelling reason was ride quality while towing. The 1500 had a very floaty ride from the factory and after hitching up the trailer, properly adjusting the equalizer bars and loading up for a camping trip I found out that I was exceeding my GVWR by a touch (no biggie IMHO) but it porpoised like crazy. So I upgraded to 5100 shocks. Took care of most of the towing issues but induced other issues. Namely it felt like the truck would shudder on the same road defects that caused the porpoising. You could really feel an 11K trailer having it's way with that truck and man it felt like it was twisting. Running empty the truck was skittish over bumps and rode much harder.

 

Flash forward to a 2500 duramax. I'm just below GVWR, the truck doesn't porpoise and the z71 shocks have just the right damping to allow a good (but firm) unloaded ride. I test drove a 3500 srw before purchase....seemed much too firm for a daily driver...perhaps if the tires were aired down sufficiently.

 

I don't know if the OP cares about the numbers and I'm certainly not the weight police but I think he'll find that most fifth wheels will push the rear axle over the limit and most likely the gvwr and gcvwr. I am certain the OP will be pleased with the acceleration and braking under load...but ride quality and safety margins might suffer.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question for you Grumpy, why is diesel so much more than gasoline? Seems to me that it may be slightly a little less refined than gas and it doesn't have 10% alcohol which presumably lowers the price of gas
    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way too big headlights (similar to a previous non-Wrangler SUV) should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crossing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...