Jump to content

what to do about rust on frame


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2011. On the frame there is some unsightly rusting that is in my opinion a real eyesore. It is very noticeable to me in the wheel well also on the springs. On the frame it looks like chunks of the coating that were applied have fallen off and now the rust is very visable. What do you guys recommend? Can I get an undercarriage treatment done that will coat and seal? If so where is the best place to get something like this done and aprox how much should something like this cost.

It is very frustrating as in the winter time I make a decent effort to clean off the salt. I see many other trucks (non gm) that are older than mine that do not have this issue. My truck is black so the rust in the wheel well sticks out like a sore thumb.

Posted

GM is apparently warrantying that if you complain hard enough. You are right, GM is having a problem that others are not. My 01 frame is on it's last legs. I was told that undercoating would void my warranty.

I use Krown on everything now. I have spent 40 years fixing my beaters and undercoated vehicles are night and day better than untreated. Krown is the only one I know CAA recommended. That would be AAA in the US. One other tip. 3M stone guard on the rockers and rear panel bottoms. Stops the stones from chipping the paint which over time will take them down to bare metal and the corrosion begins. It is a tough clear coat sheet, the stuff is great.

GM has got the "engineering" down to a fine art. As soon as the warranty is off you are screwed. It is a 10 year truck. Actually I heard they changed the warranty, my 01 had a 10 year perf warranty. It barely made it. So if you have a 6 year warranty you own a 7 year truck. It pisses me off, my 68 chev half ton, I took it off the road in 90 and made it into a trailer. That trailer still has a better frame than my 01 had off the lot. Too bad my 01 doesn't have enough metal left to tow it.

Posted

my 04 25HD frame looked so bad after 7 years plowing snow that the buyer asked if the truck was under the salt water at one point ! (sold it cheap)

and I used to use the car wash under carriage wash like every 2 weeks year round for all those years (no help)

 

now I buy new every 3-4 years - won't deal with all that rust (frame, brakes & tranny & fuel lines) and more ... )

 

sure the newer ones are better but not THAT better - they're not fooling me ($$$)

 

my 2015 is better overall than my others - and all had an excellent drive tranes - no issues ever

Posted

there is also a product called "chassis saver" that appears to be a good product based on my research....there are you tube videos showing it being used. I am also a fan of Krown as a prevenative measure.....

Posted

It is a sad state of affairs. You can't justify $35 to $50k for a truck that will only last 7 years. Krown is reasonable if it works but I'm only 5 years into that test on my Hyundia. I still wash it regularly as the liquid crap is all over 4 seasons here. Changing my snows is a great time, you can really give it a go twice a year on the underside.

Makes you wonder though, I have an 88 aluminum boat with zinc anodes. A steel motor frame attached to it. Zero corrosion. Maybe Ford does have a better idea. But if the frame doesn't last you have nothing. On my 01 GM, drive line, motor, tranny, SS exhaust, plastic gas tank, all mint and original. Frame and brakes lines suck. Shackles suck. Just waiting for my shocks to let loose and dent my box.

Posted

So today I decided to stop into the dealership that I purchased truck from new in 2011. I went to the body shop to inquire about the rust issue. The girl at desk went out with me to look at truck. As soon as she looked at it she said "yep that is manufactures defect, wax peeling off of frame. GM sent out a bulletin regarding this", she then asked me how many miles I had, I responded with 26,900. She said "your covered, it is 3 year, 36k" I told her it was '11. She said "oh, I guess you are not covered". She said since it was over 3 years bulletin did not apply to me, I waited to long.

How could I wait to long when I never knew about the bulletin? She told me I could go speak to service manager, it was out of her hands. Of course the service manager was out today. I sent him a detailed email today and will follow up on Monday with a call.

If this is "manufacturers defect" how can my claim be denied. I don't care if it is beyond 3 years, it is their defect and they need to address it. I was never notified about any bulletin. She said the fix is to scrap off the wax coating and reapply. That is exactly what I want done. I bought the truck new, take care of it and GM needs to stand behind their product. I worked hard to pay for that truck.

Posted

exactly, the same crap on my 01 and same problem. You would think they would catch on after 15 years.

Stay after them. I had the same issue with my rear brakes, everything shot after 20k. "normal wear and tear" They are like insurance companies, first or second replies are always, no not covered. Just google the problem and get some ammo and go back again.

I got the $900 brake job covered. They just have to make a call and get authorization I believe.

Posted

Well here is an update. i went in yesterday to speak with service manager. he directed me back to the body shop and had them write up an estimate for the job. I received a call from the body shop today and was told that GM will cover the job minus a $200 deductible that I would have to pay. I tried to protest having to pay anything but I could tell it would not go anywhere, so I made an appointment to have the work done. I am happy that the frame will be getting a new coat of protectant. They told me they would be applying a product called Kryptonite.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 1 Anonymous, 330 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...