Jump to content

Rebuild sbc 400 in K10 or Crate motor?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi All,

I want your recommendations on what to do with the motor in my 1979 K10. See my signature for specs. The truck runs fine now but drinks gas and was only 180hp but 330 tq new in 1979. I would like to get it to 400hp 400tq so I can have a smile on my face when its drinking gas.

 

Here are some options.

 

1. Rebuild current 400, up compression ration, Dart or Vortec heads, etc.

 

2. Buy a zz383 or similar from Chevrolet Performance. Warranty is a plus but will cost more than a rebuild.

 

3. Buy a 383E for my 97 that is currently running great and take the current 350 out of 97 and put in 79. I believe it should bolt up to Turbo 350 transmission. I would need to do an electric fuel pump, get a wiring harness, intake, computer, etc from junk yard. This would be time consuming and more work than a crate motor but I would have a Fuel injected motor in the ol 97.

 

What do you recommend? I would like to keep budget 3K - 6K.

 

 

 

Here's a few pics because posts are better with pics!

 

 

post-50150-0-99396800-1447563519_thumb.jpg

post-50150-0-11197900-1447563523_thumb.jpg

post-50150-0-47962500-1447563529_thumb.jpg

post-50150-0-99396800-1447563519_thumb.jpg

post-50150-0-11197900-1447563523_thumb.jpg

post-50150-0-47962500-1447563529_thumb.jpg

post-50150-0-99396800-1447563519_thumb.jpg

post-50150-0-11197900-1447563523_thumb.jpg

post-50150-0-47962500-1447563529_thumb.jpg

post-50150-0-99396800-1447563519_thumb.jpg

post-50150-0-11197900-1447563523_thumb.jpg

post-50150-0-47962500-1447563529_thumb.jpg

Posted

According to the local landfill scale, the truck weighs 5,080 lbs with both tanks full.

post-50150-0-35511000-1447563593_thumb.jpg

post-50150-0-35511000-1447563593_thumb.jpg

post-50150-0-35511000-1447563593_thumb.jpg

post-50150-0-35511000-1447563593_thumb.jpg

Posted

well if you don't want to rebuild the 400 give it to me for my '66! haha, but i'd rebuild that 400, those are beasts!

Posted

5.3 crate or used junkyard 6.0 with a new manifold and a carb

Posted

well if you don't want to rebuild the 400 give it to me for my '66! haha, but i'd rebuild that 400, those are beasts!

LOL, I thought it would be cool to keep the original 400 in it so I may go that route. But just weighing my options. I'm sure someone else has been here before and has advice on what they did or what they wished they did.

 

The 400 does burn some oil on startup but not enough that I have to add any between oil changes. I think it is the Valve guides leaking? But I want more power!!!

Posted

5.3 crate or used junkyard 6.0 with a new manifold and a carb

 

A LS would be nice, but I would need the matching trans and transfer case? Which then means fabricating new motor and transmission mounts, Shift linkage, etc.

I currently have the NP203 full time 4x4 chain driven transfer case. I converted it to part time 4X4.

Posted

 

A LS would be nice, but I would need the matching trans and transfer case? Which then means fabricating new motor and transmission mounts, Shift linkage, etc.

I currently have the NP203 full time 4x4 chain driven transfer case. I converted it to part time 4X4.

Holley/hooker make mount kits. Trans is adaptable
Posted

Nice truck you have! Get a crate motor from GM.. IMHO..

 

Thanks! I was going to sell it awhile back but I just couldn't do it. Now its time to put some $$$ into it.

Posted

Holley/hooker make mount kits. Trans is adaptable

 

I will look into that. What kind of mpg city / highway do you get with your 6.0?

 

Besides 2500 / 3500 trucks, the GMT800 Denali Yukon XL's had 6.0's correct?

Posted

LOL, I thought it would be cool to keep the original 400 in it so I may go that route. But just weighing my options. I'm sure someone else has been here before and has advice on what they did or what they wished they did.

 

The 400 does burn some oil on startup but not enough that I have to add any between oil changes. I think it is the Valve guides leaking? But I want more power!!!

 

Around my parts people go out of their way to snatch those up, a lot of dirt track guys run them aswell, they can be built up pretty and be pretty sweet engines, I'd 100% say rebuild and tune up that 400 any day

Posted

 

I will look into that. What kind of mpg city / highway do you get with your 6.0?

 

Besides 2500 / 3500 trucks, the GMT800 Denali Yukon XL's had 6.0's correct?

HD, all denalis, silverado SS, and Escalade. I can manage close to 20 hwy and my normal commute in town about 20 miles a day with a lot of stop lights and 10 miles of freeway a day gets me about 14ish. Depends on my mood and A/C

0a286431c2462ddebf170c18b5fa8424.jpg

Posted

I would never...... ever buy a GMPP crate engine. A friend of mine owns an engine shop and I have personally got to tear down some that come in and just wow....... Junk. Failures are failures but these things are failing from just piss poor build quality. This goes all the way from your basic Goodwrench crate 350 up through the big blocks. Metal chips from not deburring, improperly installed main caps, valve seats ground crooked or falling out, piston to wall set to tight and scuffing etc. Very very poor workmanship, ill fitted parts and GM's warranty is utterly bogus. For the amount of money those things are to buy and all the fancy paperwork they show up with it sure doesn't mean much. I haven't seen an LS crate apart yet but I don't see how they would be any different. I have a crate L76 6 liter I sold to a friend but we are going to tear it down and measure it all before he ever runs it..... not to mention delete the afm and whatnot.

 

Build the 400 if you want to stay with a SBC as they are a fun engine. We put one together that ended up in a circle track car but it's a nice mild mannered engine that makes around the power you are after. It has basic Vortec heads on it, a marine spec'd hydraulic roller cam ( modest split duration... I think 218/224 on a 112 lsa) and 9.5:1 compression. The owner chose an aftermarket crank and rods for the build as he started with a bare block and forged pistons. The engine makes good torque honestly and great mid range power..... peters out just over 5 grand. The Dart Iron Eagle 165 S/S is basically a production Vortec head in a heavier duty casting with a normal intake manifold bolt pattern. But there are a thousand different opinions on a Gen 1 small block lol.

 

An LS would make more power though, run smoother doing it and be even more fun but it's all what you want. You can easily LS swap for your budget. A cam and headers equipped LQ4 will make the power you want..... plop on some 243 or 799 casting heads found off of every Gen IV 4.8 or 5.3 and bump the compression to 10.3:1 and have even more fun!

Posted

1994Vmax offers some good advice. A junkyard LS will make 400 hp pretty easily and run very smooth, the bigger the LS, the easier the 400 comes. If you stick with your original small block 400 the key is getting the right cam, and better flow and the compression bumped up (mostly from the right heads), from there it all depends on where you want your power to start. The cam profile recommended would work well, keep your LSA in the 112 degree range, it will idle smoothly and you will make nice bottom to mid range torque which is what you want for a heavy vehicle. The HO 350 cam profile and similar grinds are good torque makers and places like Summit are good places to shop for stuff reasonably priced. If you want a lopey idle then a higher stall converter will be in order for an automatic trans and your power starts to move upstairs. Either the iron Vortec or Dart heads mentioned are very good power makers, both are much better than any other stock chevy iron head even from the 60's, but with the vortec heads it requires center bolt valve covers, special vortec bolt pattern intake, self aligning rocker arms and your lift is limited depending on who you talk to at around .480 + or -. They also have pressed in rocker arm studs. For not much more $$ I'd go the iron Eagle head route, you should be able to get an assembled set for around $900. With 64cc chambers and a stock bottom end with the pistons down in the holes a bit and dished pistons you should end up around 9.0 to 9.5:1 compression, do some bottom end work and get flat top pistons up at deck height and things get better. Hot Rod did a junkyard 350 a number of years ago where they yanked a 350 out of a 77 Impala (hardly performance oriented) didn't nothing to the engine other than bolt on parts, and got just over 400 HP using vortec heads, carb, intake, cam, headers, etc., none of it was anything special, so 400 HP is very realistic. If you feel the bottom end of your 400 is in good shape, bolt on the parts mentioned and have fun!

Posted

Thanks fr the repleys and keep them coming! I keep getting all nostalgic about keeping the 400 and building it so I will probably go that route. I am also seriously thinking about putting a 700R4 built to withstand 400hp and tq or 500 hp tq to replace the old Turbo 350. I hear I will ether have to move everything ahead 3in and keep stock front and rear driveshafts. Or leave engine in original position and move crossmember back 3 inches and get new front and rear driveshafts.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 450 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...