Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What kind of cameras and gear do you guys shoot?

 

I've been an "equipment guy" in most of my hobbies and interests all my life. I suppose I think good gear will make up for my low talent.

 

I'm a Nikon guy. 'Been one since I got my first one at 12 years old in 1968. I was doing mostly black &a white back then. Developed and printed every size from wallet pix to 30x36 wet mounted. Bought my second one, an F-2 right out of high school. Then got away from photography for many years, taking only the occasional snapshot from various waterproof film cameras on horseback.

 

My wife tried to drag me back into it when she picked it up and bought a film SLR just before the dslr explosion, a N80 or 90, as I recall. Her interest in it waned after a couple years.

 

The digital boom hit and I reluctantly tossed my hat in the ring after they had been around a bit. A D50, followed by a D300, then the D7000 and a D7100. A week ago my new D500 showed up, but I haven't had time to really use it. Dealing with my elderly mother lately, so I loaned it to my next door neighbor to run it thru its paces. He's a dyed in the wool Nikon techie that has loaned me gear over the years and visa versa.

Posted

I like my Canon stuff. I still use a lowly T4i with 18-55, 18-135, and 75-300 lenses. I dont have the need to upgrade. The quality is good and it shoots 1080p video.

Posted

I shoot a Canon as well. 7D mark II, and a few lenses. Most used lenses are Canon 400mm F5.6L, Sigma 150-600 C for wildlife, and Canon 17-55mm f2.8, and the 50mm f1.8 for autos.

  • Like 1
Posted

I shoot a Canon as well. 7D mark II, and a few lenses. Most used lenses are Canon 400mm F5.6L, Sigma 150-600 C for wildlife, and Canon 17-55mm f2.8, and the 50mm f1.8 for autos.

I havent played with different F stops yet, but that 18-135 is my favorite lens. Probably because i had to actually buy that one.
  • Like 1
Posted

I havent played with different F stops yet, but that 18-135 is my favorite lens. Probably because i had to actually buy that one.

Changing the F stops is really great for greater depth of field, and faster or slower shutter speeds depending on what your trying to achieve.

Posted

Changing the F stops is really great for greater depth of field, and faster or slower shutter speeds depending on what your trying to achieve.

Chris,

Wide apertures give shallow depth of field, or a shallow focus range. Useful for accentuating the subject.

 

Smaller apertures give more depth of field.

 

 

Rules

1 f stop = 1/2 or double the light, depending on whether you open or close the aperture.

 

1 shutter speed is either 1/2 or double the light depending on faster or slower

 

1 shutter speed is equal to 1 f stop and they are interchangeable.

Posted (edited)

The lenses I have for my Nikon include 10-24 AFS DX f3.5-4.5, 16-80 AFS DX f2.8-4, 18-105 AFS DX f3.5-5.6, 35-70 AF ED f2.8D, 70-200 AFS DX VR f2.8, 70-300 AFS VR f4.5-5.6, 60mm micro AFS f2.8G, and a Sigma 120-300 f2.8. I need to thin some lenses..

 

I think I have enough flashes. (2) SB-800s, (1) SB-700, (1) SB-300, (1) SB-400 I could stand to reduce here too.

Edited by spurshot
Posted

I need a flash, and the lens i used at the meet was my 18-55. The standard one that comes with the camera. I need to get something a little wider i think too

Posted (edited)

The lenses I have for my Nikon include 10-24 AFS DX f3.5-4.5, 16-80 AFS DX f2.8-4, 18-105 AFS DX f3.5-5.6, 35-70 AF ED f2.8D, 70-200 AFS DX VR f2.8, 70-300 AFS VR f4.5-5.6, 60mm micro AFS f2.8G, and a Sigma 120-300 f2.8. I need to thin some lenses..

 

I think I have enough flashes. (2) SB-800s, (1) SB-700, (1) SB-300, (1) SB-400 I could stand to reduce here too.

 

the 10-24 must be interesting.

strangely a focus for internet generation..

the "tiny" width. (it means everything is tiny) :)

 

I was handed a 35mm in the 80s. Film.

the only picture that was not of someone who is dead today was taken by my dead grandma..

a picture of me.

 

in this scary place called rural maine where the soul less and primates still roam, the stereotype of cameras and a boy working it, had me get rid of it.

 

After my close call in long term disability, military sucker punches..

that camera got real important in my memory.

 

I first got a 1 megapixel fuji film for digital.

that one got some tropical spider in brewer maine, now a copyrighted photo of choice for some bug site.

inspired by accident, odds and chance..

and that is photography anyway.

making history.

 

I then got one for free, an hp (hewlett packard) something.

my first nikon is still working.

coolpix 5mp..several thousand shots with that one.

 

I then fell for the sony translucent stuff.

sony slt a-35. First real camera.

that one will never get old to me.

..and that does lead to some advice.

never let an old camera go.

it is amazing what years does.

 

for lenses, I got the crazy version of the 55-200.. the 200 end is more like a 400. Well known mistake among sony gurus.

glad I found one cheap.

the other is regular 18-55, every day stuff.

 

I go extraterrestrial out here in the maine skies, where the stars are sparkling like a mig welders torch, and mars is actually red.

I have two more lenses I want to get some day.

 

something finally satisfied is staying in manual mode at all times.

I revolve around iso400 most of the time.

the way the sony controls.. the aperture and shutter speed is a very quick move.. just had to learn it, like a six gun to a cowboy.

Edited by barry G
  • Like 1
Posted

Barry, I think learning to shoot manually, without a light meter, using only experience of ASA/ISO - aperture - shutter speed, and your gut, provides a huge insight. Like you said: like a six gun to a cowboy.

 

The Nikon 10-24 is a new (to me) addition to my collection in the past month. No pix with it yet. It replaced a Tamron 11-18, as the Nikon is known to be better in all regards.

 

The best glass I have is the Nikon 70-200 AFS VR f2.8 with super fast focus and my old film lens, a 35-70 f2.8D which auto focuses but doesn't have a motor in the lens, relying on the body motor to mechanically drive focus much slower. The D500 came kitted with a new design 16-80 f2.8-4 lens which is being given high marks for sharpness, color, etc. that may make me give up the all metal and ED glass bulletproof, ton and a half, 35-70

Posted

I need a flash, and the lens i used at the meet was my 18-55. The standard one that comes with the camera. I need to get something a little wider i think too

If you mean you need a wider lens for shooting cars, in my opinion, you don't. I used to work for Honda taking pics at their dealership, and I used my 17-55. I have a 10-22mm, but never use it for automotive, just real estate, and landscape. Cars shows are tricky, but I would rather shoot cars at a longer focal point if possible, but i know that's not always possible.

Posted

If you mean you need a wider lens for shooting cars, in my opinion, you don't. I used to work for Honda taking pics at their dealership, and I used my 17-55. I have a 10-22mm, but never use it for automotive, just real estate, and landscape. Cars shows are tricky, but I would rather shoot cars at a longer focal point if possible, but i know that's not always possible.

Not for cars, just in general for when im on the road or in the mountains and want to save a moment
  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

i shoot with canon

 

main body is a 70d. back up body is a 50d.

 

my gear......

 

 

_MG_1920_zps88021af6.jpg

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I'm a Nikon guy, and photography is a hobby I enjoy.

 

Nikon bodies:

D70, D300, D3s, and D4s

 

Nikon lenses (I only buy Nikon):

Prime:

10.5mm f/2.8 (DX)

85mm f/1.4

105mm f/2.8 VR

200mm f/4 macro

200mm f/2 VR2

 

Zoom:

14-24mm f/2.8

17-55mm f/2.8 (DX)

24-70mm f/2.8

70-200mm f/2.8 VR2

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 442 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...