Jump to content

CAI....thoughts on the 6.2


Driver72

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys, I'm sure there are a bunch of posts about CAI for the Silverado/Sierra, but going through them all would be nauseating. So, couple quick questions:

 

This is my first new GM vehicle, though I've owned many dozen vehicles, GM never really stuck my fancy until recently. So I'm new to GM.

 

How is GM and most GM dealers regarding basic modifications like a CAI? Will they give you crap, flag your warranty, etc.?

Second, has a good CAI actually proven to be beneficial to power/performance and also SOUND on this truck.

I know on many cars, CAI companies claim improvements but they don't deliver. My Hellcat is a perfect example. Most claim 30-35 rwhp with them, but many, including myself who bought one and TESTED it, found it did SQUAT for power without tuning. Many, including mine, were returned when zero power nor actual VBox testing showed any improvements.

 

Thanks for you input.

Posted

I did the MIT tube from airaid, and the sound it makes under acceleration is great, and not unbearable. Blackbear will be releasing dyno information on a number of intakes on a 6.2l soon on another thread here. That should answer your power questions. The MIT tube on the previous generation 5.3l engine made 10 or 11 horsepower at the rear wheels in their previous testing. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong. As far as warranty goes it's really up to your dealer. Some can make it a hassle for the fun of it. As long as I don't touch the computer mine is fine with it.

Posted

I did the MIT tube from airaid, and the sound it makes under acceleration is great, and not unbearable. Blackbear will be releasing dyno information on a number of intakes on a 6.2l soon on another thread here. That should answer your power questions. The MIT tube on the previous generation 5.3l engine made 10 or 11 horsepower at the rear wheels in their previous testing. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong. As far as warranty goes it's really up to your dealer. Some can make it a hassle for the fun of it. As long as I don't touch the computer mine is fine with it.

i did the same, with a drop in k&n filter. you don't hear it until you lean on the throttle. $$ well spent imo

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,945
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    thefultonhow
    Newest Member
    thefultonhow
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 682 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...