Jump to content

Tunes and headers

lineman74
 Share

Recommended Posts

lineman74 Enthusiast

lineman74

Posted
Posted

So I'm seriously considering having Santa bring me a BBP tune. My question for you guys that have tuned is, is it a waste of time to tune without putting on headers and a cai?

 

My main goal in the tune is just to unlock the trucks potential, I don't need a top hp machine.

 

Thanks

truckguy82 Senior Enthusiast

truckguy82

Posted
Posted

So I'm seriously considering having Santa bring me a BBP tune. My question for you guys that have tuned is, is it a waste of time to tune without putting on headers and a cai?

 

My main goal in the tune is just to unlock the trucks potential, I don't need a top hp machine.

 

Thanks

I am very happy with my truck completely stock with a tune.

 

If you go with blackbear, you get free tunes afterwards if you decide to modify.

 

So you are not wasting a nickle if you upgrade in stages and see how you like it.

 

Tune first

 

That's also what I did, told my wife I wanted an early xmas present, just got it done about a month ago. Now she won't have to spend another few hundred of my money on some other gift!

lineman74 Enthusiast

lineman74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I am very happy with my truck completely stock with a tune.

 

If you go with blackbear, you get free tunes afterwards if you decide to modify.

 

So you are not wasting a nickle if you upgrade in stages and see how you like it.

 

Tune first

 

That's also what I did, told my wife I wanted an early xmas present, just got it done about a month ago. Now she won't have to spend another few hundred of my money on some other gift!

lineman74 Enthusiast

lineman74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

That's what I'm up against at my house also. I've never modified any vehicle besides tires and now I'm having to justify how to spend my money. Isn't marriage grand!

 

That was my thought as well, just tune now and add in the future. I wasn't sure if there was any benefit to adding before doing the tuning.

 

Thanks

speedbump Enthusiast

speedbump

Posted
Posted

What kind of performance enhancements can be expected from a tune?

I tuned my old 2001 Sierra C-3 with a 6.0 liter engine and didn't see much difference except in shift points.

lineman74 Enthusiast

lineman74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

What kind of performance enhancements can be expected from a tune?

I tuned my old 2001 Sierra C-3 with a 6.0 liter engine and didn't see much difference except in shift points.

Look at Black Bear's website, they can custom tune your truck. There are several guys running their tune and have seen awesome results. AFM delete is a biggie with most guys

crushNchowda Senior Enthusiast

crushNchowda

Posted
Posted (edited)

So I'm seriously considering having Santa bring me a BBP tune. My question for you guys that have tuned is, is it a waste of time to tune without putting on headers and a cai?

 

My main goal in the tune is just to unlock the trucks potential, I don't need a top hp machine.

 

Thanks

Not a waste of time at all particularly on a GM vehicle w/ a smallblock V8 & automatic tranny. GM is notorious for tuning down there performance drivetrains in an effort to meet CAFE regs, "protect" consumers who may not be capable of handling 450hp w/ no electronic nannies, & "protect" components from excessive wear for warranty purposes. The performance tune will do a few things - remove speed limiter, tweak/lower the torque mgmt programming (this is what pulls engine tq goinf to the rear wheels), eliminate pulled timing, increase shift torque pressures so there's less "slop"/delay in shifts, address shift points, adjust air/fuel mix for more power & even better mileage (it's common for stock vehicles to run on the richer side as a precautionary measure since they have the stingy heavy duty cats anyhow the extra fuel doesn't hurt emissions).

 

Additionally w/ these new DI engines allow for even finer tuning of the A/F ratio I've heard & are capable of netting even more power from a tune alone vs. your standard FI engine all else being equal.

 

The benefits from the tranny tuning alone would make it worth doing regardless of any power gains.

 

If you have a reputable engine tuner w/ a dyno in your area who's familiar w/ GM vehicles I would recommend trying that route first as the gains will be better & the tune will be custom matched to your specific truck. On my old '04 GTO w/ the LS1 I had a diablosport handheld tune on it w/ a CAI & exhaust, I ended up getting a custom tune b/c I wanted to add headers...just to prove to me it was worth going to him in the future even on a stock vehicle vs. getting a mail order or handheld tune he dynoed my car stock & then adjusted everything prior to adding the headers I picked up an extra 11whp just from his tune over the diablo tune.

 

I have also had custom dyno tunes done on other stock GM vehicles (they didn't all stay stock LOL) like my old '08 G8 GT, my '03 Z06, my previous '07 Silverado....I have yet to get my current 6.2 Sierra done only because I'm waiting until spring when I put on bigger/heavier BFG K02's - that way they can address the speedo & I'll get the max benefit of the tune doing it w/ the heavier tires on it so its tuned to full potential w/ that setup vs. the stock rubber.

 

That's not to say there's anything wrong w/ going w/ black bear, I'm just saying if you have access to a good dynotuner you would get more performance for your $$$ IMO.

Edited by crushNchowda
  • Like 1
truckguy82 Senior Enthusiast

truckguy82

Posted
Posted (edited)

What kind of performance enhancements can be expected from a tune?

I tuned my old 2001 Sierra C-3 with a 6.0 liter engine and didn't see much difference except in shift points.

The 5.3 and 6.2 are both powerful engines, they just don't feel like it, at all. The tune essentially makes it feel like the power is there. Changing the shift rpm, the throttle, shift speed, and reducing torque managment is way more important for the driving experience than power. Your old 6.0 had a real throttle cable and no torque managment, I am absolutey certain you will see a much bigger difference tuning your current truck.

 

If you asked me what would be more fun, a 500hp truck on the factory tune, vs a 420hp truck with a tune, I'd take the 420hp truck any day.

Edited by truckguy82
  • Like 2
Rawyzf Senior Enthusiast

Rawyzf

Posted
Posted

Not a waste of time at all particularly on a GM vehicle w/ a smallblock V8 & automatic tranny. GM is notorious for tuning down there performance drivetrains in an effort to meet CAFE regs, "protect" consumers who may not be capable of handling 450hp w/ no electronic nannies, & "protect" components from excessive wear for warranty purposes. The performance tune will do a few things - remove speed limiter, tweak/lower the torque mgmt programming (this is what pulls engine tq goinf to the rear wheels), eliminate pulled timing, increase shift torque pressures so there's less "slop"/delay in shifts, address shift points, adjust air/fuel mix for more power & even better mileage (it's common for stock vehicles to run on the richer side as a precautionary measure since they have the stingy heavy duty cats anyhow the extra fuel doesn't hurt emissions).

 

Additionally w/ these new DI engines allow for even finer tuning of the A/F ratio I've heard & are capable of netting even more power from a tune alone vs. your standard FI engine all else being equal.

 

The benefits from the tranny tuning alone would make it worth doing regardless of any power gains.

 

If you have a reputable engine tuner w/ a dyno in your area who's familiar w/ GM vehicles I would recommend trying that route first as the gains will be better & the tune will be custom matched to your specific truck. On my old '04 GTO w/ the LS1 I had a diablosport handheld tune on it w/ a CAI & exhaust, I ended up getting a custom tune b/c I wanted to add headers...just to prove to me it was worth going to him in the future even on a stock vehicle vs. getting a mail order or handheld tune he dynoed my car stock & then adjusted everything prior to adding the headers I picked up an extra 11whp just from his tune over the diablo tune.

 

I have also had custom dyno tunes done on other stock GM vehicles (they didn't all stay stock LOL) like my old '08 G8 GT, my '03 Z06, my previous '07 Silverado....I have yet to get my current 6.2 Sierra done only because I'm waiting until spring when I put on bigger/heavier BFG K02's - that way they can address the speedo & I'll get the max benefit of the tune doing it w/ the heavier tires on it so its tuned to full potential w/ that setup vs. the stock rubber.

 

That's not to say there's anything wrong w/ going w/ black bear, I'm just saying if you have access to a good dynotuner you would get more performance for your $$$ IMO.

 

This pretty much says it all. Great post.

 

I tuned my truck before headers, and it was worth every penny. Just the shifting characteristics was worth the tune in my opinion.

 

Gains are to be had as well on a stock truck. My tune wasn't done on a completely stock truck (Catback and MIT Tube), but I gained 30hp and 34tq from tuning with my 5.3L.

 

Link in my sig for e85 has Dyno charts for my truck.

 

 

  • Like 1
speedbump Enthusiast

speedbump

Posted
Posted

OK guys, your getting me excited. The truck is a year old and I just had the new torque inverter installed because of the studder when trying to downshift thingie going on. I am not pleased with the way the truck shifts now and never have been, so that improvement would be great by itself. I don't know if there is a tune guy in my area but I'm going to find out. No matter what I end up doing, I will come back and tell y'all about it.

 

One more quick question, is the Wife going to like the truck better after the tune, because she drives it now and then.

truckguy82 Senior Enthusiast

truckguy82

Posted
Posted

OK guys, your getting me excited. The truck is a year old and I just had the new torque inverter installed because of the studder when trying to downshift thingie going on. I am not pleased with the way the truck shifts now and never have been, so that improvement would be great by itself. I don't know if there is a tune guy in my area but I'm going to find out. No matter what I end up doing, I will come back and tell y'all about it.

 

One more quick question, is the Wife going to like the truck better after the tune, because she drives it now and then.

I'd be scared to local with DI and the 8speed.

 

Chances someone has extensive experience on these is slim and there are certain things, which I'm not aware of, that the 8speed does not like and is easy to screw up.

 

If you were doing turbo's or nitrous, I'd probably say go local as you'll need wideband tuning.

 

I'd rather have a blackbear tune than a local tune any day for a mostly stock vehicle. He's tuned 100's of them. Could it be a little conservative, sure, but 10hp isn't worth the risk IMO.

 

Also blackbear doesn't really do "canned" tunes. While the mail order service doesn't have "live tuning", he still looks at what your individual truck is doing through stored sensor data and makes adjustments from there.

 

You could also go custom through blackbear if he's coming to your area. That's what I did.

lineman74 Enthusiast

lineman74

Posted
  • Author
Posted

My truck came with cat back exhaust and I am planning an MIT upgrade over stock intake. It sounds like headers aren't a necessity at this time and will probably go ahead and "risk" the tune with only 2300 miles on it. Thanks for the input gentlemen.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 2,783 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • B14Sierra
      Cam chain tensioner question

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • dna9656
      No low range 4 x 4

      By dna9656 · Posted

      My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • asilverblazer
      Transmission Woes :-(

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...