Jump to content

Junior trying to change road rules

Elwood

By Elwood
in The Off-Topic Bar

Recommended Posts

Elwood Senior Enthusiast

Elwood

Posted
Posted

Junior trying to change road rules; bad week for B. Bodine

 

By Lee Spencer -

 

 

Dale Earnhardt Jr. is lobbying NASCAR to adopt the old Formula One qualifying rules when the Winston Cup teams go to road courses. It would allow drivers to run multiple laps, with the fastest counting as their qualifying time. Under the current setup, drivers run only one lap for qualifying. That leaves little room for error and is challenging for many who aren't as savvy on road courses.

 

"I can race all right, but I just can't get a decent starting spot," Earnhardt says. "If we don't get the opportunity to do that, then I'm looking to do more road racing stuff, maybe with Jim France's (Grand American) Series to get a little more experience on the road courses."

 

Junior, who won the 1999 Busch Series race at Watkins Glen, considers road courses the most physically demanding tracks on the Cup circuit. …

 

Tony Stewart recently shook down a new road course Monte Carlo at Virginia International Raceway in Alton, Va., and plans to run the car this weekend at Sonoma.

 

Stewart, the defending Winston Cup champion, says it's the chassis that matters at Sonoma. "It's not a big aero place because we never run that fast," he says. "It's a track that depends on technical grip a lot more than aero grip."

 

With an average qualifying position of 2.5 and average finish of 7.0, Stewart always is a threat at Sonoma. …

 

Brett Bodine, the last of Winston Cup's privateers, was hit with a double whammy last week. First, Hooters announced it was withdrawing sponsorship from the No. 11 Ford. Then, Bodine suffered a concussion and a broken collarbone and needed eight caps for his teeth because of a practice crash at Michigan.

 

Battered and bruised, Bodine says he is optimistic a new sponsor will be on board before the end of the year. Brother Geoffrey Bodine filled in at Michigan but dropped out early and finished 39th. …

 

Owner Larry McClure must have slept through the Motorsports 101 lecture about shaking down new cars before putting them on the track. His No. 4 Pontiac failed to qualify at Michigan; the team hadn't taken the car to the wind tunnel or tested it before unloading it last weekend.

 

"If we made a mistake as a group, it was leaving the car we qualified third with at Charlotte in favor of the new one," driver Mike Skinner says.

 

Though the team is 40th in points, Skinner says it has made significant gains in its engine program and that he and crew chief Chris Carrier are getting along better. However, that won't matter anymore -- Skinner was fired on Monday. . . .

 

Stanton Barrett is the latest financial casualty in the Busch Series. Roush Racing suspended operation of the No. 60 Ford following what the organization called "a 15-race marketing test" for Clean Control Corp., the manufacturer of sponsor OdoBan.

 

Insiders say continuation of the sponsorship agreement was contingent on direct sales, but Roush president Geoff Smith said the company no longer would "extend credit" to the sponsor.

 

The decision was not a result of Barrett's performance. He was 16th in points and had four top 10s. Smith says the No. 60 could return later in the year with Mark Martin, Jeff Burton or Greg Biffle as the driver if significant sponsorship is found.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • GAMark
      Road Master Active Suspension

      By GAMark · Posted

      Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • Erfar
      Oil Change

      By Erfar · Posted

      have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • cherryred21duramax
      Can anyone decode a VIN to determine if this truck has had emissions issues or a recall?

      By cherryred21duramax · Posted

      Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Engine Wear and ISO 4406   1.) Cold Starts. 2.) High Particle Count. 3.) Low operating temperature viscosity and high low temperature cranking viscosity. 4.) Depleted AW, Friction and Acid packages.  5.) High engine load.    https://me.caltexlubricants.com/en_me/home/learning/from-chevron/heavy-duty-diesel-vehicles-and-equipment/The-Importance-of-Clean-Engine-Oil-and-Its-Impact-on-Equipment-and-Business-Performance.html   High particle counts have five sources. 1.) They are manufactured within the engine. Both wear debris and amalgamation of degradation products and combustion driven soot (worse in GDI). 2.) They are ingested via intake air. Ever hear the best oil filter is a good air filter? 3.) They are entrained in the fuel. 4.) This one is insidious. They are introduced in 'fresh oil'. 5.) They are introduced during the oil change.   ISO 4406 is the test that measures and quantifies the combine effects of all of the above particle related issues. You can mitigate your way into multiples of engine life by being attentive to them all.    https://www.hyprofiltration.com/blog/is-new-oil-clean   (from the link above)    [Quote] What Is the Recommended ISO 4406 Cleanliness Code for New Oil?   A good upper limit for new oil cleanliness is 16/14/11 (ISO 4406). Typical new oil usually has ISO codes of 19/17/15 or worse, which is far too dirty for sensitive components. This can be a major cause of degradation and premature failure. [Close quote].     Source of graph: Machinery Lubrication (GM Study)  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...