Jump to content

Using Car Gauge Pro with GMT900


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all,

 

I have a 2010 Silverado WT CC 4x4 which is fairly new to me. Iv'e put about 8k miles on it, total mileage is 182k. I have a new ELM327 adapter and an older USB adapter which I can use to read codes with OBD Whiz or an app. I did some research and discovered that, supposedly, one can use the Car Gauge Pro app on an android device to read extended codes such as ABS, BCM, etc. I have used the app and adapter and can read basic codes, but the connection seems as though it not quite correct. I get some Body, Chassis, Powertrain, and network codes which don't seem to reference any valid GM code. Does anyone have experience with this or a similar app who can help me with the connection setting such as the correct Adapter Protocol and ATST values? Perhaps give me some gems for the app or other common connection issues.

 

A little background. I started getting strange electrical issues all within a few days of each other. My horn quit working, my ABS and Stabilitrak lights came on, and my CEL lit with a P0521 code. I live in Spokane WA and we've had lots of snow/rain/ice and freezing temps over the last 3 months. I shook and spun my tires yesterday and my wheel bearings(front) don't seem bad but one of my recently replaced Moog problem solver tie rods does. One of my other goals was to read my oil pressure to try and DDx the P0521 code. None of the custom pid's I've set up for the oil pressure seem to work.

 

Thanks!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

oil stayed analog for decades, just basic low warning is like a switch.

 

lighting is number one monster for weird triggers in places that they do not belong.

LED is a huge fix...even the timing on the engine gets faster.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Mediocre, how much did they lose on the poorly conceived EV strategy?   I wonder how much the stock price is being 'inflated' by all the buy-backs?   Cadillac literally looks like a brand without a rudder, no clear goals or product direction - performance or luxury? I guess performance because we can throw a small block in whatever we can and call it a day. Certainly not luxury when a Denali or High Country is reasonably cross shoppable. The Celestiq - no way - no vehicle can command quarter million prices when something wearing the same badge is on the buy here pay here lot across town.   Notice the 'base' Escalade doesn't even come with the 'leather-appointed' seating surfaces.   Hummer EV - fail Silverado EV - fail Sierra EV - fail Bolt/Volt EV (The most successful EV cancelled, restarted, cancelled, whatever its current status it)   Hybrids - none Sedans - none Medium duty - not anymore Minivan - none Coupe - none Convertible - none CUVs - 20+/-   6.2 Recall that landed squarely on the GMs highest seller - and specifically the fattest margin higher trims of the Yukon, Escalade, et. al. The most critical product line they fumbled big time. In the Escalade segment, are those buyers forgiving GM for a bad engine and patiently waiting for the fixes and dealing with the headaches? Nope, they dump them and go straight to the other premium brands.   In the ENTIRE GM portfolio how many aspirational vehicles are there? Corvette, Escalade (quickly being superseded by the obvious better value Denali)...   I posted somewhere else... what if Cadillac left the luxury game and became a performance brand similar to AMG or (gasp) Ferrari? Cut all the entry-level and base models from their line up and focus on the V-series or Blackwing or whatever they call it now. Of course, those would have the pre-requisite luxury and technology as standard equipment. This opens the floor for Buick to step in/up as the luxury brand (like they are in China), no 'performance pretenses' get rid of the 'entry-level' models with equally 'entry-level' power trains and become the Maybach to Cadillacs AMG. With those two brands effectively out of the way Chevrolet, the 'entry-level' brand has the floor to itself and GMC can take over as 'professional grade'.    Now each brand has a focus, no in-fighting, clear direction, and customer targets.   Just need to sneakily slide Corvette into the Cadillac brand and dump the vestigial script writing.
    • I can't get enthusiastic about the 1.5T (or the 1.3 or the 1.2), I won't drive a CVT. But the stupid things sell in volume.
    • There is a big difference in motorcycles and vehicles - nobody needs a motorcycle, they WANT one. That WANT is the most powerful force to drive price upwards.   I've hated every iteration of the Equinox, a prime example of GM laziness. It excelled at absolutely nothing, barely competitive by every metric. At least the latest generation looks decent.    I want to like the Buick Envista, but that pitiful engine plus FWD only is a BIG NO for me, I don't care how good it looks.
    • For as much hate as Ms. Barra receives on here, she sure is a shrewd businesswoman....
    • Love my new 2026 truck - even as a basic WT it's comfy, rides nicely, etc.   Encouraged by the 100K powertrain warranty.   2nd GM I've ever owned (1st was a 2000SLE with Vortec V6 - loved that truck.) Small question - maybe I'm missing it in the manual? - but I seem to need to press the unlock button first, in order to open driver's door.  (Don't care as much about passenger door.) RKIs: is there any mod/setting change, etc such that when I merely pull the door handle it just unlocks + opens? I have minor concerns about ability to exit regardless of electrical performance. (I'm a bit limited agility w/osteoporosis from hyperparathyroidism - big guy, age 62, range of movement etc issues.) Thanks, Bill San Jose CA
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...