Jump to content

Gas Pedal Squeaking?

SilveradoSaver

Recommended Posts

SilveradoSaver Senior Enthusiast

SilveradoSaver

Posted
Posted

Any of you have an issue with your gas pedal squeaking? Just recently started happening (under 45,000 km on my truck). I notice it mostly when I have accelerated and take my foot off the gas pedal. Sounds like plastic rubbing on plastic.

 

I have an appointment at the dealership next week Monday to have this looked at, but was wondering if anyone might have any ideas?

 

Thanks.

SilveradoSaver Senior Enthusiast

SilveradoSaver

Posted
  • Author
Posted

A little spray-on white grease or WD-40?

 

 

Really? You think that's all it is? Just seems odd that under 50,000 km it starts to squeak. Hate to go out of warranty and find out it's a bigger issue when it's too late.

SilveradoSaver Senior Enthusiast

SilveradoSaver

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well, it's certainly worth a "shot" before you have to take it somewhere for service.

 

 

Fair enough. I'm picking up my new running boards and having them installed at the same time conveniently enough, so it's not out of my way.

 

Thanks for the suggestion!

dave07 Enthusiast

dave07

Posted
Posted

I have had my gas pedal replaced 3 times because of this. There is nothing to lubricate down there and make it go away so they have been replacing it. Stupid design if you ask me. Its just plastic rubbing on plastic. My concern, over time, is will it start to stick if I don't keep getting it replaced?

dave07 Enthusiast

dave07

Posted
Posted

If it rubs, it can be lubricated.

Try it dry sometimes; you'll see.

Go look at your "gas pedal" next time you get in your truck. The gas pedal is more of an electronic sensor. Actually they call it a throttle position sensor. I'd definitely be worried about spraying a liquid lubricant in there for fear of messing up the electronics. This is why I mentioned it to the dealer and they seem to agree with me since they didn't lubricate it but replaced it instead (3 different times @ 2 different dealers).
BigBlueLB756 Senior Enthusiast

BigBlueLB756

Posted
Posted

Silicone lube worked well on electro-mechanical assemblies in the military aircraft I worked on..Maybe it's different with GM stuff.

SilveradoSaver Senior Enthusiast

SilveradoSaver

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just got back from the dealership on this. Even the service advisor said they ordered a new pedal for me and didn't spray it with any kind of lubricant as they didn't want to mess up the electronics on the pedal. Hopefully the new pedal is better next week!

dave07 Enthusiast

dave07

Posted
Posted

Just got back from the dealership on this. Even the service advisor said they ordered a new pedal for me and didn't spray it with any kind of lubricant as they didn't want to mess up the electronics on the pedal. Hopefully the new pedal is better next week!

Good! Unfortunately, my squeak returns between oil changes. Hopefully you have some better luck.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SilveradoSaver Senior Enthusiast

SilveradoSaver

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Good! Unfortunately, my squeak returns between oil changes. Hopefully you have some better luck.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fingers crossed!

tnchevy Senior Enthusiast

tnchevy

Posted
Posted

Mine made a squeaking noise during my first winter of ownership (bought in the summer) that was brought on IMO from the plastic shrinking/expanding due to temp differences. Dealership fixed mine by taking putting in some foam tape in the assembly and haven't had a problem with it since.

pm26 Senior Enthusiast

pm26

Posted
Posted

I occasionally get gas pedal creak (not really a squeak) in my 2009 Impala with 115k on it. It does not bother me too much, but as already mentioned the solution is to apply a small amount of synthetic grease to the right area.

 

In the past I had a very annoying squeak from my Mazda clutch pedal bushings and finally I got rid of it by spraying WD-40 into the bushings. I usually had to reapply WD-40 every 30k miles or so as squeaking would return.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 423 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...