Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I searched and saw Caster mentioned several times. I had an alignment done on my truck several months back and they said they were unable to get Caster in spec. On the drivers side it is in at 2.7 degrees. On the passengers side it is out at 4.1 degrees. It has not caused any wear on the tires as you would expect. The truck centers like it should when coming out of a turn. Right now I am not worried about it but was just wondering why there is no adjustment on Caster on our trucks? Anyone have any idea?

 

I am stock height with stock suspension. Two wheel drive.

Posted

Remainder of specs

 

Camber

.4 and .3

 

Caster

2.7 and 4.1

 

Toe

.04 and .06

Posted

There is caster adjustment on our trucks and it is very simple.

 

Before we start, caster is not a tire-wearing measurement. Toe and camber will wear tires, whereas caster will only mess with steering feel and handling.

 

Caster is the relationship of your upper steering locator (upper ball joint) to your lower steering locator (lower ball joint), measured as though you're looking at the tire. Positive caster means your upper steering locator is located further back than the lower, meaning your upper ball joint is further towards the rear of the truck. Negative caster would be exactly the opposite. The upper locator would be located forward of the lower locator, hence why a vehicle will handle so well going forwards but so poorly in reverse (at speed).

 

The upper control arms on our trucks (and GM trucks since the 90s) come with eccentric bolts where they mount to the frame. This simply means the bolts have an egg-shape where they pass through the control arm bushings. Using this design, alignment can easily be corrected if your mechanic knows what to do. Say you want to add positive caster, you could loosen the front-most mounting nut, and turn the bolt to a point where it pushes the arm outwards. This in turn moves the entire UCA slightly rearward, therefore increasing caster.

 

While adjusting caster, you should know that it's also going to rapidly change your camber measurements. Unless your truck has been in an accident and something is tweaked, there's no reason you cannot get a proper alignment.

 

Attached is a picture of my alignment with my truck lowered 4" in the front, and 7" in the rear. Positive caster isn't going to hurt anything as far as tires are concerned, I was more worried about my toe and camber. If anything, more positive caster should make steering effort slightly increased, and it can also help in high-speed handling, as the tires will be able to "lean" over further, and more readily return to their straight-ahead position.

 

DM if you have any questions!

 

Toe is on the bottom, camber in the middle, and caster on the outer edges.

post-164754-0-97087800-1494768261_thumb.jpg

post-164754-0-97087800-1494768261_thumb.jpg

post-164754-0-97087800-1494768261_thumb.jpg

post-164754-0-97087800-1494768261_thumb.jpg

Posted

There is caster adjustment on our trucks and it is very simple.

 

Before we start, caster is not a tire-wearing measurement. Toe and camber will wear tires, whereas caster will only mess with steering feel and handling.

 

Caster is the relationship of your upper steering locator (upper ball joint) to your lower steering locator (lower ball joint), measured as though you're looking at the tire. Positive caster means your upper steering locator is located further back than the lower, meaning your upper ball joint is further towards the rear of the truck. Negative caster would be exactly the opposite. The upper locator would be located forward of the lower locator, hence why a vehicle will handle so well going forwards but so poorly in reverse (at speed).

 

The upper control arms on our trucks (and GM trucks since the 90s) come with eccentric bolts where they mount to the frame. This simply means the bolts have an egg-shape where they pass through the control arm bearings. Using this design, alignment can easily be corrected if your mechanic knows what to do. Say you want to add positive caster, you could loosen the front-most mounting nut, and turn the bolt to a point where it pushes the arm outwards. This in turn moves the entire UCA slightly rearward, therefore increasing caster.

 

While adjusting caster, you should know that it's also going to rapidly change your camber measurements. Unless your truck has been in an accident and something is tweaked, there's no reason you cannot get a proper alignment.

 

Attached is a picture of my alignment with my truck lowered 4" in the front, and 7" in the rear. Positive caster isn't going to hurt anything as far as tires are concerned, I was more worried about my toe and camber. If anything, more positive caster should make steering effort slightly increased, and it can also help in high-speed handling, as the tires will be able to "lean" over further, and more readily return to their straight-ahead position.

 

DM if you have any questions!

 

Toe is on the bottom, camber in the middle, and caster on the outer edges.

 

Thanks for the great response. My truck was bought used so there may have been a wreck at sometime. I have been under it changing oil and checking around and can see no signs of damage or where it may have been pulled. It drives straight and shows no signs of abnormal tire wear. I do keep the tires rotated every 10K and do about 85 miles roundtrip everyday to work and back.

Posted

You're very welcome! If I wasn't a mechanic, I'd look for a shop that specializes in high performance vehicles. The guys and gals that do alignments at these shops should know exactly what to do. Just make sure to assert that you want them to make the proper adjustments on the upper control arms!

 

-Shaun

Posted

I was looking at Rockauto and noticed they have a specific set of upper control arms for trucks with Z60 suspension. They were cheap enough and I ordered them from Advance Auto. The control arms look the same but the ball joints came loose in the box and are offset to correct caster.. I have been hesitant to install them and they have been on the shelf.

Posted

You shouldn't need something like that on these trucks. It really is simple enough to move the eccentrics.

 

Typically we install ball joint adjusters on Ford vehicles with twin I beam front ends, as there is no "upper control arm" to adjust.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way to big should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crosing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...