Jump to content

Floor liners. OEM vs, weathertech or husky

Loco-diablo

Recommended Posts

TXS Heat Enthusiast

TXS Heat

Posted
Posted

Husky foe the win! WT has really gone down hill.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Donstar Senior Enthusiast

Donstar

Posted
Posted
On 3/12/2018 at 12:35 PM, goeb34 said:

Love my huskys, had em for about 6 months no slip issues or curling issues so far, just trying to keep them clean 

I just installed Husky Weatherbeaters.  (I ordered the X-act contour  but these came instead)  I know there is a price difference but I actually like the feel of these Weatherbeaters underfoot and love the look/fit.  I don't know know how the Countours could be an improvement.  Why did you choose the Weatherbeater?

  • 2 years later...
RST Mike Enthusiast

RST Mike

Posted
Posted
On 7/19/2017 at 7:58 AM, Loco-diablo said:

I'm in the market for floor liners. I know the topic has been discussed here before, but a search didn't bring up much. Some dealers on ebay have a decent price on the chevy oem liners ($165) for full set double cab.

My buddy has the weathertech in his 17 denali HD and is not happy about the curling that's happening. Particularly on the passenger front liner upper right corner. Any thoughts?

Just came across this post in my search for floor liners for my 2020 Silverado crew cab.  Lasfit just came out with new floor liners that are really nice for 2019+ Crew Cabs with the under rear seat storage box.  They are running a Father's Day special right now where you get $50 off the $149 price with free shipping using code FORDAD-2 at checkout , so you can get front and rear floor liners for $100 plus tax and they are great quality. (The back is one piece that goes all the way across)  Here's a link to Lasfit's site: http://lddy.no/msyj

lasfit.png

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined

  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,931 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Aimatdeer
      Ac not keeping up

      By Aimatdeer · Posted

      Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • scotthvac.net
      2022-24 halogen - led grille swap

      By scotthvac.net · Posted

      2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...