Jump to content

add keyless entry and remote starter Sierra HD 2007


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone, I would like to insert the remote keyless and remote start on my GMC Sierra.

currently, I only have the key without a remote control. Is it work feasible or can not be done?

 

20171211_162915.thumb.jpg.92462bfb7a2a8db7c172a11b33e91969.jpg

 

RPO GMC - TRIMS.txt

Posted

Go through your dash settings on the cluster. Scroll through and see if there is an option for remote start. Also what trim level is your truck


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I don't have the DIC dome, but in the Trip reset button, the setting for reprogramming the remote control does not appear. 

For the trim, in the tailgate have SLE emblem, but if I go in the GM Parts Headquarter, and enter the chassis number in the search bar it appears to me that it is a WT trim.

 

trim.thumb.png.35070e6b2785059441d8c5a5faa3c49a.png

 

 

 

 

Posted

WT is work truck. Meaning no options no fills work truck. If that’s the case. Easiest way to add remote lock and remote start is an aftermarket alarm unit with remote start like a compustar or something


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 1 month later...
Posted

This is a 2007 Silverado? My GM electronic service information is a "Stand-A-Lone" on CD's, but only goes up to 2004. The 2007 model trucks I believe was there first year for OEM "Remote Start" on the key fob with a circle type symbol. Do you have remote keyless? I so, the receiver should inside the passengers door module. It picks up the signal to unlock. If the vehicle has RKE and a replacement  BCM part number shows only one, should have "Remote Start" available. It may take re-programming the BCM with TECH-Link, it will ask the question, Remote Start? If answered yes, you would have to have the correct key fob for starting. 

Like I said, I do not have a schematic for door controls, BCM, or re-programming which at some point requires something other than holding the unlock button on, key in, "On-off,On-off, On-off, release the unlock button on the door, the locks cycle once, Then you push both lock / unlock on the new key fob to relearn. I believe it will learn up to four key fobs. 

Maybe, maybe not. If someone has GM eSI that is current, then it should be obvious. Although, I have never heard of "Work Truck" only, unless GM was offering something dirt cheap to get you into it. 

Just trying to help with possibilities. 

Posted
On 29/3/2019 at 1:27 AM, LH Lead Foot said:

This is a 2007 Silverado? My GM electronic service information is a "Stand-A-Lone" on CD's, but only goes up to 2004. The 2007 model trucks I believe was there first year for OEM "Remote Start" on the key fob with a circle type symbol. Do you have remote keyless? I so, the receiver should inside the passengers door module. It picks up the signal to unlock. If the vehicle has RKE and a replacement  BCM part number shows only one, should have "Remote Start" available. It may take re-programming the BCM with TECH-Link, it will ask the question, Remote Start? If answered yes, you would have to have the correct key fob for starting. 

Like I said, I do not have a schematic for door controls, BCM, or re-programming which at some point requires something other than holding the unlock button on, key in, "On-off,On-off, On-off, release the unlock button on the door, the locks cycle once, Then you push both lock / unlock on the new key fob to relearn. I believe it will learn up to four key fobs. 

Maybe, maybe not. If someone has GM eSI that is current, then it should be obvious. Although, I have never heard of "Work Truck" only, unless GM was offering something dirt cheap to get you into it. 

Just trying to help with possibilities. 

My truck is Sierra HD 2007 (new body, not classic), I only have the ignition key without any remote control. If it's possible, I want remote key fob first, but if I can also add the remote start it's better.

In the RPO's sheet, I have the code AU3 (LOCK, SIDE DOOR, ELECTRIC) not AU5 (LOCK CONTROL REMOTE ENTRY, LOW FREQUENCY)

 

This is the AU3 Electric Scheme

au3.thumb.jpg.562d85d98e4a89acddb256a96153697e.jpg

Posted

Yes, this would be a GMT900 series. I wish I had current GM eSI as dealers have, but don't. Mine stops at 2004. Sorry but my paper RPO code book only goes to 2002. It shows code AUO (1982-2002) Lock Control, Remote Entry (Keyless Entry System). My RPO code book show that most codes are the same used back to 1976 at a glance.

If you can find a member on this forum or dealership buddy, the remote keyless entry schematic can be printed. With this in hand, study it to have a game plan for what you have versus what you need. The passengers door module has been the receiver for RKE since 2003. I would expect it may be the same in your vehicle, but having the wiring diagram is the place to start. depending on what you find, a few components, connectors or wires at worse maybe need. Armed with this information you can create a game plan and determine if it's worth it. 

It's only at this point, I could only suggest a bone yard search to find a glove box lid with "AUO", get what you need, purchase aftermarket key fobs for the action you want. The BCM may have to reprogrammed using the VIN number (Or On Screen Prompts / TECH2) to activate the used drivers that control these circuits that respond to class 2 serial data. 

 

When asked to take these new tests, my service manager offered 10 cents pay per test passed / on flat rate, would put me at almost $7 a flat rate hour. Customer pay was $22 per hour.

 I became an ASE Master Tech while DATSUN was on the front of the building. I quickly found that one wiring harness was used. It contained wires & connectors for any factory optional equipment the vehicle had available, but no shipped with. With the expense of wire, connectors, terminals, all strung on a board by hand, tested the finally wrapped with data markers showing shift, plant and model option. I would bet that your vehicle has non of the required noted products are currently inside the dash or doors. I am only guessing but with the best I can offer is someone else will have to get the actual schematic, study it and go from there. Sorry.

 

I will say aftermarket product have become better over the years, but you may not even have a door lock actuator in the passengers door. MPC sell vehicle specific remote start with keyless entry systems that include key fobs. This might be your only choice. best of luck.

Posted
On 31/3/2019 at 8:08 PM, LH Lead Foot said:

Yes, this would be a GMT900 series. I wish I had current GM eSI as dealers have, but don't. Mine stops at 2004. Sorry but my paper RPO code book only goes to 2002. It shows code AUO (1982-2002) Lock Control, Remote Entry (Keyless Entry System). My RPO code book show that most codes are the same used back to 1976 at a glance.

If you can find a member on this forum or dealership buddy, the remote keyless entry schematic can be printed. With this in hand, study it to have a game plan for what you have versus what you need. The passengers door module has been the receiver for RKE since 2003. I would expect it may be the same in your vehicle, but having the wiring diagram is the place to start. depending on what you find, a few components, connectors or wires at worse maybe need. Armed with this information you can create a game plan and determine if it's worth it. 

It's only at this point, I could only suggest a bone yard search to find a glove box lid with "AUO", get what you need, purchase aftermarket key fobs for the action you want. The BCM may have to reprogrammed using the VIN number (Or On Screen Prompts / TECH2) to activate the used drivers that control these circuits that respond to class 2 serial data. 

 

When asked to take these new tests, my service manager offered 10 cents pay per test passed / on flat rate, would put me at almost $7 a flat rate hour. Customer pay was $22 per hour.

 I became an ASE Master Tech while DATSUN was on the front of the building. I quickly found that one wiring harness was used. It contained wires & connectors for any factory optional equipment the vehicle had available, but no shipped with. With the expense of wire, connectors, terminals, all strung on a board by hand, tested the finally wrapped with data markers showing shift, plant and model option. I would bet that your vehicle has non of the required noted products are currently inside the dash or doors. I am only guessing but with the best I can offer is someone else will have to get the actual schematic, study it and go from there. Sorry.

 

I will say aftermarket product have become better over the years, but you may not even have a door lock actuator in the passengers door. MPC sell vehicle specific remote start with keyless entry systems that include key fobs. This might be your only choice. best of luck.

I think I will take an aftermarket remote system (i have the actuators in both doors because from locking button inside, I can close all the door), thank you so much for your elucidations

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,979 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
    • Fix one problem and find another.   Truck didn't have a thermostat in it so I flushed out the system today and refilled with 50/50 Dexcool. This truck is so old (LOL) that it has a sticker under the hood alerting people to the fact that it contains such. There is also an orange supplement with the owner's manual alerting the owner that "Your vehicle is one of a number of late production 1995 General Motors vehicles that use a newly developed engine coolant in the cooling system..."   I was still a little flummoxed by what seemed like a rich condition (exhaust smell, and a puff of carbon with a punchy rev). While watching the coolant temperature and testing the thermostat with my scanner, I happened to notice the IAT (incoming air temperature) to the intake was -40F. I know the temp is below average today, but I can still feel my face, and I was wearing shorts.   D'oh!! I realized I had never plugged the IAT back in, and the airbox was out while I was doing coolant. So I paused, reinstalled the airbox and plugged in the IAT, and viola. Things cleared right up, and I watched the coolant temp climb to a reported 198 degrees on the scanner (195 thermostat) and then it dropped to 194 (open) and then back up to 198 and held. Let it cool, came back, checked the coolant level and was satisifed.   Victory lap?   It needed more than the couple of gallons of gas I put in it from almost bone dry, so I ran it up to the gas station. It had earned it, or, at least I was pretty certain I wouldn't be draining or removing the tank anytime soon.   CEL popped on just as I was cruising a nice steady 40mph, just after coasting down a slight downhill curve.. Of course, it did, because, why let me enjoy not having dash emojis for a little while.   I just happened to have the scanner plugged in. I don't text and drive but I might scan and drive. Don't tell the police.   P0401, EGR flow insufficient.    Well, hello, EGR... ...my old friend! Welcome to the party, now that the engine reaches the factory-programmed operating temperature. I'm sure it was gagging on hostile, rich exhaust and carbon this whole time so I'll take it off and look again.   At least it's easily accessible, and worst case, about $65 to replace.   To keep, or to sell... Hmm. I want it running correctly either way. It's easier to sell when there are no fault codes.   It needs tires (they're aged out and cracking)   It could probably use an oil pan seal, or maybe the timing cover gasket/ junction with the pan needs redone because I've got an issue there that leaves a drop of oil on the floor.   If I do tires I'm sure they'll say the ball joints could use freshening, and, and, and, and.... At some point I'll have to stop. I can't (shouldn't) make it perfect, that's not what this rig is.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...