Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Where is this ground located?  I know there should be two main grounds coming from the battery.  Haven't traced either of them yet.

Edited by BlaineBug
Posted

This ground is in the passenger side wheel well. You do not need to remove the fender liner to get to it. I used a wire wheel and adhesive remover. I cleaned it up pretty well when I was done. But you can see that something may have been going on with the ground itself. The other runs to the back of the engine block and looked fine. I may do what someone else did and add another ground to to brake booster. I have not pulled the dash apart yet for the BCM ground. That will be my next step. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Bmcghan09 said:

This ground is in the passenger side wheel well. You do not need to remove the fender liner to get to it. I used a wire wheel and adhesive remover. I cleaned it up pretty well when I was done. But you can see that something may have been going on with the ground itself. The other runs to the back of the engine block and looked fine. I may do what someone else did and add another ground to to brake booster. I have not pulled the dash apart yet for the BCM ground. That will be my next step. 

That sounds like G141.  Tech found mine to be "full of undercoating" the other day as well.

Posted
6 hours ago, BlaineBug said:

That sounds like G141.  Tech found mine to be "full of undercoating" the other day as well.

I'll pull the dash one G218 this week or weekend. looks to be like a 10 minute job to get to it. 

Posted (edited)

"A ground bolt without the proper hardening may not properly clamp/secure the ground eyelet."

What would improper hardening do?  Does this cause the fastener to stretch over time?

I have also heard G141 referenced many times for being corroded or in my case it was undercoated.  How badly it was undercoated, I don't know since I didn't do the work.  Apparently G141 is the only connection between chassis and the battery as G103 is between the battery and engine.

Edited by BlaineBug
Posted
6 minutes ago, BlaineBug said:

"A ground bolt without the proper hardening may not properly clamp/secure the ground eyelet."

What would improper hardening do?  Does this cause the fastener to stretch over time?

I have also heard G141 referenced many times for being corroded or in my case it was undercoated.  How badly it was undercoated, I don't know since I didn't do the work.  Apparently G141 is the only connection between chassis and the battery as G103 is between the battery and engine.

Yes from the battery it is only two grounds, one to the frame and one to the engine. Engine looked to be fine. G141 on mine was pretty nasty. I bet only half the terminal was contacting. Lots of undercoat under it and some corrosion.  I tightened it up pretty good. It's still on my list to add a ground from the battery over to the break booster. This would put a direct BCM ground less than 12" from the battery ground. I assume the bad fastener does stretch and allows the terminal to back away. 

Posted
Just now, BlaineBug said:

Has your issue returned after checking out G141?

I wont know, It happened a couple times like 5 weeks ago on a Saturday dealer had it for a few days couldn't make it do it again and then 4 weeks later it did it and wouldn't start for like 15 hours. Tried it once in the morning then one more time an hour later and its been fine since. It hasn't done it to me since friday night, I had it towed home because I knew it would start. I just cleaned up the ground tuesday and I guess we wont know for a while. 

Posted
20 hours ago, BlaineBug said:

Just about as sporadic and elusive as you can get.  That's unfortunate.

Well taking the dash apart was very fast and easy less than 5 minutes. Now getting to the ground is another story it’s in an awful spot and but I finally got to it. And yup the plastic was pinched right there. I had to use a shallow well 10mm a universal and a few extensions but I got it off and trimmed. I’m just realizing I forgot to put a harness clip back on that ground but oh well. 

88C995C8-044F-4DFE-BA75-556536B75B01.jpeg

A43AA81E-4C13-439F-B3D4-2E52667461AE.jpeg

DFAD5AA3-A0B2-41AE-B938-3A1CF3BF7732.jpeg

Posted (edited)

Seeing that your truck is a 2014 model I would have thought your dealer would have taken a look at all of the TSBs.  And the TSB regarding this ground G218 is definitely on par for 2014-2015 models for sure.

What's the harness clip that you forgot?

TSB 18-NA-161.pdf

Edited by BlaineBug
Posted
1 hour ago, BlaineBug said:

Seeing that your truck is a 2014 model I would have thought your dealer would have taken a look at all of the TSBs.  And the TSB regarding this ground G218 is definitely on par for 2014-2015 models for sure.

What's the harness clip that you forgot?

TSB 18-NA-161.pdf 2.32 MB · 3 downloads

It is just a little plastic piece that runs a harness over the ground. I’m sure it’ll be fine. Probably just for assembly/ rubbing reasons. 

Posted (edited)

I think I know what you're talking about.  My OCD would probably have me re-doing it.  By the way there is apparently also a ground under the same location on the passenger side.  Although the BCM doesn't ground there so it hasn't been problematic as far as I know.

Edited by BlaineBug

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,800
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    mans44
    Newest Member
    mans44
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 437 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Disassembly may be Required!   Every blender makes claims but do  you ponder those claims? What was really said? Was it true?  Motive for saying it? What does in infer?  Is that inference true?    Let's do one.    Claim: Made from shear stable base oils.    What was said: Base Oils are shear proof.   Was it true: Yes.  ALL base oils are Newtonian.    Motive / Inference: To imply the fully formulated product is Shear Proof.    Is the Inference true?: Most fully formulated multigrade oils contain Viscosity Modifiers or VM's, sometimes called VII or Viscosity Index Improvers. There are four types. One is in fact shear proof but it also has a bad effect on extreme cold flow and is restricted to use in specialty oils. A second has limited shear called a 0-5 SSI polymer. Meaning its shear is limited to a range of zero to five percent as reported by the ASTM D6278 Shear Stability Index test. A few high end oils, like Torco SR-5, use them and brag about it profusely. Actually all that use it point it out. The last two shear dramatically and are often marketed as a 'feature' of the product aiding the oil to meet fuel standard requirements of ever stricter rules. One shears more than 5% and the other up to 20%. As you make guess, cost is directly linked to shear down and as such the majority of oils use the cheapest organic polymers sold to make grade and pass stringent tests.    PPD's or Pour Point Depressants also shear a bit, only a few percent and hide inside the 0-5 SSI capabilities.    The blender knows he can not out engineer Stribeck. Physics is not a suggestion. But he can wordcraft the unsuspecting toward believing a false claims INFERENCE. This is LEGAL. It is COMMON, and it is EFFECTIVE.         
    • I don't recall ever dealing with one on an '06 and back. It may not even exist on that. I can't remember for sure.   Any kind of ice in or after the evaporator is normally due to low charge with both a clutch-cycling orifice tube system, and a TXV system.
    • Engines wear. It is unavoidable. So the question isn't if it will wear out but rather WHEN it will wear out. That question is about rate and RATE is a HUGE problem for almost everyone; but not in the way we may think.    Unless there is something drastically wrong with your powertrain, wear is exceedingly slow. It doesn't wear out in minutes or hours or days or months but in years or even decades. Ditto sludge and varnish. Humans are an impatient lot so to see the benefit of a truly superior product you may have to wait a very long time. Most will get bored first and trade before they reap the benefit.   Humans are not companionate creatures when it comes to those we do not know. We don't care what happens to the second or third owner as long as it doesn't happen to us or someone we know and actually like.   Sad commentary on humans but it is what it is. That thus, then, there is no advantage...to or for you if the above paragraphs adequately describe you.    BUT if you are a buy and hold type and patient enough to reap the rewards of your labors then that thing that is happening that you haven't yet seen, but will; can be abated by such products. Seals harden and leak with time and lots of it. Rings stick after thousands of miles of a slowly building plaque of varnish.    Then there is this. This didn't happen over night and this poor fellow knew when he removed the cover and not one second before.   Not "aware' isn't the same thing as "isn't happening".        The above was typical of the Ford 361 and 391 bus motors on Bulk Pennzoil Mineral Oil products on 3K mile OCI's at about 60K miles back in the 60's and 70's at the Anamosa School District when my Uncle took over their maintenance program.    This is Pepper at @ 165K on 5K OCI's using Group IV/V Full Synthetics.      HM oils will help the first but not the second.    Then again if one used..... ah, ya know.....
    • Thanks for coming back with an update. 
    • Awesome you got it sorted! That's a new potential issue I'll have to mark in my book of issues. Thanks for the feedback.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...