Jump to content

4.8 vs 5.3


Recommended Posts

Posted

 Hey guys, I'm looking at a 2012 1500 work truck with the 4.8, I'm unfamiliar with the 4.8 and prefer the 5.3 on principle alone. My question to you is, any positive or negative reviews for the 4.8? Many thanks in advance

Posted

It's still an LS engine just with less power and typically less issues on the engine at least.

 

The 4.8 only has VVT where as the 5.3 has AFM/DoD and VVT on 2010+ engines. The active fuel management is a known issue and the 4.8 won't ever have that problem.

 

It's a somewhat sizeable power drop from a 5.3 but it's not going to so slow that you hate it. It will still have good power and can haul stuff just fine.

 

The 4.8's come with 4L60e's still, so there is always that you could possibly deal with. The 5.3 have a 6L80e in all 2010+ trucks, it's stronger but with any transmission there is always a what if.

 

If you drive it nice, the 4.8 likely will edge the 5.3 in fuel mileage but not enough to really brag about.

Posted
4 hours ago, Scott Zopf said:

 Hey guys, I'm looking at a 2012 1500 work truck with the 4.8, I'm unfamiliar with the 4.8 and prefer the 5.3 on principle alone. My question to you is, any positive or negative reviews for the 4.8? Many thanks in advance

Great engine and no AFM to mess with.  Just don't buy it to pull 7,000 pound trailers with.  

Posted

It puzzled me during those years why GM made two different small blocks. The fuel mileage wasn’t that different. Same as the 5.3-6.2. Just use a 6.2 that can run on reg or premium gas for more power even E-85. Im sure some real smart guy knows the reason. This redneck from Texas is puzzled. Maybe they should ask Ram.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Posted

Fuel economy reasons for sure. 1-2 mpg helps a ton when going against the EPA and CAFE stuff.

 

Plus the 4.8 was used in the vans and other products that bought GM engines on the commercial side. Having an engine with no AFM/DoD is a plus for them.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,242 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The oil filter has NOTHING To do with oil leak. GM sources parts from 1,000's of vendors and as with anything mass produced, flaws are unavoidable.    Putting a larger oil filter will do nothing but satisfy emotions. The OEM filter is designed for the engine and perfectly capable of handling the demands on the engine. Oversize oil filter could result in reduced flow and overall lower oil pressure.
    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...