Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I can’t find the parts numbers for these, any one know what they are, I know there’s 2 different packages each with different models for ior and ios

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Just a heads up - a simple google search showed the three results below. 

 

 

PART # SSICRE14 - Powered Subwoofer Upgrade System for 2014 - 2018 Chevrolet Silverado / GMC Sierra 1500 Crew Cab.  Also compatible with 2015 - 2018 Chevrolet Silverado / GMC Sierra Crew Cab 2500/3500.

https://www.kicker.com/SSICRE14

 

 

PART # SSIEXT14 - Powered Subwoofer Upgrade System for 2014 - 2019 Chevrolet Silverado / GMC Sierra 1500 Double Cab.  Also compatible with 2015 - 2019 Chevrolet Silverado / GMC Sierra Double Cab 2500/3500.  Will work in 2019 1500 Silverado LD and 2019 Sierra Limited (old body style) only.

https://www.kicker.com/SSIEXT14

 

 

2019 Sierra 1500 MultiPro Tailgate Audio System by KICKER®

Part # 19417163 Manufacturer : Genuine GM

https://www.shopchevyparts.com/electronics/2019-sierra-1500-multipro-tailgate-audio-system-kickerreg/19417163-p-92303047.html

 

Posted
13 hours ago, disneybaker said:

 

I can’t find the parts numbers for these, any one know what they are, I know there’s 2 different packages each with different models for ior and ios

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

https://www.shopchevyparts.com/next-gen-silverado-1500/electronics-c-26_4692_4729_4743.html

 

Two are DSP with amp for non-Bose.

 

RPO IOS (mid-level infotainment):

19417166

 

RPO IOR (base model):

19417165

 

Sub-only for any system:

19417164

 

 

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted
1 hour ago, Damronjr said:

What do you think of it?

Well, at first I was disappointed. I switched the amp switches to 1-5 up, 6 down and it got much better, but not great. The Kicker FlexTune app is ok for fine tuning but the eq on the head unit has a bigger impact on the sound. Once I turned that up a little from zero, I’m actually happy with it. 
 

I spent just under $1,000 for the sub and speaker amp, and I could definitely do all that plus upgrade the speakers doing it myself with aftermarket gear. The convenience of a factory plug and play setup is nice, but the performance could be better for the price or the price could be lower for the performance. If I was less capable, it would be completely worth the cost, but I can run my own power wire and wiring harness adapter, so I think I could have done better with the $1,000

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
Well, at first I was disappointed. I switched the amp switches to 1-5 up, 6 down and it got much better, but not great. The Kicker FlexTune app is ok for fine tuning but the eq on the head unit has a bigger impact on the sound. Once I turned that up a little from zero, I’m actually happy with it. 
 
I spent just under $1,000 for the sub and speaker amp, and I could definitely do all that plus upgrade the speakers doing it myself with aftermarket gear. The convenience of a factory plug and play setup is nice, but the performance could be better for the price or the price could be lower for the performance. If I was less capable, it would be completely worth the cost, but I can run my own power wire and wiring harness adapter, so I think I could have done better with the $1,000

395d96f0d758058767c64c4efac4efd0.jpg
Where are these dips switches everyone talks about there’s none on either side of this amp


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
23 minutes ago, disneybaker said:


395d96f0d758058767c64c4efac4efd0.jpg
Where are these dips switches everyone talks about there’s none on either side of this amp


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You have to remove the amp from the box. It's just 4 short Phillips-head screws. Underneath the amp is a rubber plug covering the switches

  • 1 year later...
Posted

I installed the 19417165 two amp system in my new 2022 TB Ltd.  I am very happy with the sub but not impressed with the second amp for the front speakers.  Also I have to adjust the balance over to about halfway to the left to equal out the left and right front speakers.  Did anyone else have to adjust the balance to get the fronts equal volume ?

Posted (edited)
On 1/14/2022 at 9:56 AM, Nick2022TB said:

I installed the 19417165 two amp system in my new 2022 TB Ltd.  I am very happy with the sub but not impressed with the second amp for the front speakers.  Also I have to adjust the balance over to about halfway to the left to equal out the left and right front speakers.  Did anyone else have to adjust the balance to get the fronts equal volume ?

Hey Nick, I have a 2022 TB LT and installed the kit for Bose and I'm really impressed with it! Couple of questions, did you also install a bass knob? And where did you connect your amp input leads?

Edited by smooth68
Posted
6 hours ago, smooth68 said:

Hey Nick, I have a 2022 TB LT and installed the kit for Bose and I'm really impressed with it! Couple of questions, did you also install a bass knob? And where did you connect your amp input leads?

I did install the control knob.  Goes right into the amp.  I can control the sub With the Kicker Flextune app also but only because I have the Kicker add on with the second amp.  I have the non-bose.  I wish I would have bought the Bose system.  I'm installing new speakers next week also.Screenshot_20220115-191036.thumb.png.90fe5f9a5007412edbc15a4ae2f407ea.png

Posted
18 hours ago, Nick2022TB said:

I did install the control knob.  Goes right into the amp.  I can control the sub With the Kicker Flextune app also but only because I have the Kicker add on with the second amp.  I have the non-bose.  I wish I would have bought the Bose system.  I'm installing new speakers next week also.Screenshot_20220115-191036.thumb.png.90fe5f9a5007412edbc15a4ae2f407ea.png

Oh cool…and I wasn’t thinking I guess but since you don’t have the factory sub you can’t connect to those leads, which is what I did.  Not sure if the non-Bose kit connects to the right front leads but the seems like it would want a signal from both channels. The flextime app might provide some decent options.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 338 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...